1. This website uses cookies to improve service and provide a tailored user experience. By using this site, you agree to this use. See our Cookie Policy.
    Dismiss Notice

Scrapebox url scrap error 429

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO Tools' started by xfreedom, Jul 9, 2019.

  1. 710fla

    710fla Elite Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2015
    Messages:
    2,819
    Likes Received:
    1,616
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Internet Marketing
    Location:
    FL
    Home Page:
    I emailed stormproxies with the issue and they replaced my gateway. Did they do the same?
     
  2. Paco Adorno

    Paco Adorno Newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2020
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Thanks again! Yes, it's definitely worst when I use advanced operators. If I don't use advanced operators l get around 50 url/s but once I add them it goes down to around 10. I'll keep trying. Hopefully it's something they can address. Maybe I'll just have to upgrade the threads package. Even their highest tier is cheaper than most services. Thanks for the help.
     
  3. Paco Adorno

    Paco Adorno Newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2020
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    They did not. Did it do the trick? They told me it could be something about my software's signature. Like Google could detect scrapebox' signature even with proxies. I googled that to see if it's a thing but didn't find anything. But please let me know if replacing the gateway worked. Thanks!
     
  4. 710fla

    710fla Elite Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2015
    Messages:
    2,819
    Likes Received:
    1,616
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Internet Marketing
    Location:
    FL
    Home Page:
    Still lots of errors. They'll probably get it fixed soon if lots of people are having the same problem.

    Still able to scrape but lots of errors, more than before barely got any errors
     
  5. Paco Adorno

    Paco Adorno Newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2020
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Same here. Lots of errors and a lot slower. Significantly slower when using advanced operators. Thanks for the reply. If I notice any changes, I'll post in the thread.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  6. loopline

    loopline Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    5,242
    Likes Received:
    2,857
    Gender:
    Male
    Home Page:
    I had 1 person today say that storm proxies refreshed their ip pool and they were now working. Ive no idea it storm proxies did something for just that one user or on the whole.

    Its not a thing. Scrapebox uses raw sockets and threads and scrapebox does not execute javascript. If scrapebox executed javascript then that gives google power to see things, but by scrapebox not executing javascript google can not tell if its scrapebox or firefox or chrome etc.. as scrapebox uses those user agents and looks like a browser.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  7. Paco Adorno

    Paco Adorno Newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2020
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    No improvement on my end. The last response I got from Storm Proxies was "this is because the change of last update in google that they have made more restriction in scraping." This response does not give me hope that they are doing anything about it. It seems like this is the new normal for them. Are other proxy services experiencing the same thing? Maybe it's time to switch? I'm going to ask them if I should expect this same performance going forward or if I should expect it to improve and I'll share that response.

    If anyone can share their experience with other proxy providers I will appreciate it. Are they getting hit in the same way as storm proxies? Are they business as usual? Maybe they experienced an impact but not as bad as Storm Proxies? Any recommendations? I appreciate the help!

    Thanks!
     
  8. loopline

    loopline Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    5,242
    Likes Received:
    2,857
    Gender:
    Male
    Home Page:
    I don't know of any other great providers at the moment, but its too early to tell. I do not know if it will be the new norm for storm proxies, I hope not.

    Im on the lookout for other providers, but nothing yet. If you find one, let us all know.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  9. Paco Adorno

    Paco Adorno Newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2020
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    Thanks so much for sharing that! It's good to know that it's too early to tell. Hopefully things improve. Today I noticed the URL/Sec went up from 2 to 15 (using 1 advanced operator). I can live with 15. Let's see if this stays consistent. I'll probably do a few trials. I'll report back if I do. Thanks!
     
  10. loopline

    loopline Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    5,242
    Likes Received:
    2,857
    Gender:
    Male
    Home Page:
    Well thats definitely good. Worst case, and I hate to say it, if a bunch of people exit them and cancel their service over this, and they have the same amount of proxies, then that will inherantly make them work better for the customers who stay. But hopefully they can get more proxies.

    the only real solutions are more proxies or less customers using them. Yes please report back, Id love to know how you get on.
     
  11. Takenotes

    Takenotes Newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2018
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    5
    Gender:
    Male
    I have reported my result using stormproxies on the other post:

    https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/scrapebox-issue.1190901/

    From the result I think the problem is on the proxies. But, about 1/10 proxies from stormproxies still works.

    So I switch to luminati.io and they give me 5 dollars to test their service. I choose to test their data center ips. The ip type is “shared (pay per usage)”, and its responding ip pool size is 20000. The result is worse than stormproxies.

    But I noticed a weird thing. I use the luminati proxy as system proxy, visit google by browser and put in the url used by scrapebox. I found it works fine. I remember I did the same thing using stormproxies and the result is same. But I can’t figure out why.

    Hope the report helps.
     
  12. loopline

    loopline Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    5,242
    Likes Received:
    2,857
    Gender:
    Male
    Home Page:
    Javascript.


    Google uses a mass of javascript and with that they can see around proxies a lot of times and they have the control. When you turn off javascript, like scrapebox does, google loses the control and then they ban ips faster.
     
  13. Takenotes

    Takenotes Newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2018
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    5
    Gender:
    Male
    Update: I try again and this time luminati works, though I still got many errors. Maybe last time there were many people in the same ip pool with me.

    Scrapebox reports luminati proxy leaks my ip, maybe it’s not safe in the long term.
     
  14. loopline

    loopline Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2009
    Messages:
    5,242
    Likes Received:
    2,857
    Gender:
    Male
    Home Page:
    If its a back connect/rotating/reverse proxy provider, then its supposed to show that. So just don't test them, just use them.

    Also a video for that type of proxy