Scrapebox spinning problem, driving me crazy!!

nufaman

Elite Member
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
1,870
Reaction score
1,345
Don't know what is happening with scrapebox but the stupid program just won't spin a comment like it should

Take this for example:

Code:
{{Can I get a nursing {degree|diploma} {while|although|whilst} {working|operating|functioning} {part|component|portion}-time?}|{Can I get {through|via|by means of} nursing {school|college|faculty} as a single {mother|mom}?}|{How am I {going|heading} to {pay|spend|shell out} for nursing {school|college|faculty}?}}

Both senuke and the best spinner show this text as a perfect spin with clear sentences. What does scrapebox show me when testing the comment?


heading to pay

Spin again:

functioning part

Test spin again:


WTF???? Anyone have any idea what is wrong with this thing and why won't it spin the comment like it should?
 
Thanks, but removing the outer brackets just fuc.ks it up even more and now scrapebox tells me that there is a bracket mismatch and won't let me save the comment

Here is a quick example:

{I have a question:} {this is question 1|This is question 2|this is question 3}

That shows fine in SB, but when I spin it to get more versions out of it like this
{I have a {question|query|dilemma}:} {this is {question|query|dilemma} 1|This is {question|query|dilemma} 2|this is {question|query|dilemma} {3|three}}

Both senuke and the best spinner see this spin without problems, but scrapebox fuc.ks up and shows me crap like
query query
dilemma: this is question

ETC
 
Scrapebox does not handle nested {{ or }}

If you want variations on comments you can place a different comment on a new line and it will randomly select one of these.
 
Well that's pretty pathetic... so you end up with kindergarten comments since this thing can't handle the decent ones.

No wonder everyone seems to use the lame {nice|good|cool} post comments

If you want variations on comments you can place a different comment on a new line and it will randomly select one of these.

Yeah... guess I'll have to do that. Thanks
 
Back
Top