why is xrummer so much better?
I don't think it's necessarily better, but I don't think any of these pieces are any better than the others.
Sort of like comparing Mike Tyson, Larry Byrd and Peyton Manning. Two of them are white......... That is all. Tyson would kick both their asses, Byrd would school them both and Manning has way more TD passes than either two.
I also have to go with XRumer, though. First of all because it's a one time payment, there's a monthly, but come on... $10. Lots of people say that XRumer is too expensive, but they're paying $2,400/year on SENuke while they're saying that, which makes no sense to me.
XRumer does so much it's ridiculous and there's no sign of it becoming less effective or useful anytime soon. Comments, profiles, wikis... It's trained for so many different PLATFORMS that you have the opportunity for way more diverse links. People will regurgitate a bunch of uneducated bullshit about how bad XRumer is for you. These are people that A) do not own XRumer or B) own XRumer and blast every retarded free list they download.
If you want XRumer to work for you, never blast free lists. Idiots do this. Then they cry about not being on top, well, if you look at their back links you'll see why... They're either nonexistent to Google (not indexed) or they're right next to somebody trying to sell big dick pills.
SENuke is trained for different WEBSITES. You can put together some crazy link profiles, but you're limited to only the websites it supports. The issue that I have with SENuke is I fear Google will one day figure out how to "decompile" a SENuke campaign. I would be more for SENuke if it was trainable, but it's not. So I'm not.
I will not even go over ScrapeBox because it's a given. If you're doing SEO and you don't have ScrapeBox, you don't have your shit together. Get your shit together because SB is step #1 for EVERY SEO in EVERY niche.