MucahitGursoy
Junior Member
- Feb 3, 2021
- 113
- 34
Do you have any predictions about who will be the new CEO?
yes but its still free, of course they are benefiting from it, but this operation is generally pretty expensive to run, maintain and improve, you cant blame someone for wanting to make money from their own productby free you mean:
1. free users increase userbase dramatically increasing overall valuation
2. free users help build and improve ai
3. free users are a data goldmine
and when theres already more capable alternatives to gpt 3.5 that are opensourced and free its a shame microsoft is so hurting for $ they need paywall it and make it retarded and useless
i can picture them:
1. splitting it up into different niches and charging more for things like code responses
2. putting absurd guard rails on it that make it basically useless
3. integrating it into windows and making their junk even more full of bloatware and useless features
I just watched a few of her interviews. I think I can say that she is the calmest and simplest woman I have ever seen in my life.Mira Murati took over as CEO until they hire someone for long term
I would probably be fine with paying a bit for a dedicated code model that doesn't have all the idiosyncracies current models have when producing code. AOI would be better but im flexible. I good coder AI is worth more than what ever they would charge probably.by free you mean:
1. free users increase userbase dramatically increasing overall valuation
2. free users help build and improve ai
3. free users are a data goldmine
and when theres already more capable alternatives to gpt 3.5 that are opensourced and free its a shame microsoft is so hurting for $ they need paywall it and make it retarded and useless
i can picture them:
1. splitting it up into different niches and charging more for things like code responses
2. putting absurd guard rails on it that make it basically useless
3. integrating it into windows and making their junk even more full of bloatware and useless features
AI took over Sama's JobWell this is something
https://techcrunch.com/2023/11/17/sam-altman-is-out-as-openais-ceo/
Not with GB right next door for free. More information will come out as they show their hand with the next moveProbably the free version will go away now and they'll gradually bump up the price to $50 a month.
Makes A LOT of sense considering:He's fired from OpenAI, but has sauntered into a cushy new job at Microsoft, to 'lead a new advanced AI research team'!

True that it only takes the talent plus the incredible servers and data centers that Microsoft provided to get them where they are. However, open source is needed as open source companies such as openAI are literally on the edge of the blade of this type of technology.. they work more efficiently and quicker than closed source so in a sense Microsoft needs an open source company to spare head all the development as they occur and then when perfected they can cherry pick and refined under their ai departments. Notice how Google is a few months behind. Mostly to the fact they are watering down their version but as closed source it takes more time to implement the other open sources white papers that are freely available.Makes A LOT of sense considering:
- OpenAI comically runs on Azure credits, so you might as well just work with the largest publicly available supercomputer array in the world.View attachment 300231
- Microsoft's e/acc vision is what pushed OpenAI to even release GPT-4 as quickly as they did.
- Sama finally has access to all of the funding he'd ever want
- As far as AI development goes, this is a win for everybody except OpenAI, which isn't that big of a deal in the grand scheme of things.