Safest Linkedin automation method

susocial said:

The safest option is to get professionally made automation software which is used by hundreds of people, with developers that know how social media networks work updating it regularly.

The second best option if you can't afford such software, is to use the scripts (subject to how well they are made).

Make sure you don't do too many actions and that you are using proxies, a maximum of 2 accounts per proxy is recommended.

Also, the Chrome browsers / accounts / content / DM messages / Comment text shouldn't be common between any of your accounts.

Try to avoid sending the same message text over and over again, you can do that by using spintext feature.

A good social media automation software should have all of these functions.

So it depends on your current financial situation, if you can afford such a tool get it, if not, try around with Chrome extensions.

Click to expand...

kristypenson said:

Which tool do you recommend for that ?

Click to expand...

lebronjamesfan said:

I'm developing a Linkedin automation tool for myself.

Which one is safer, considering I'm doing 20 InMails/day through this:

1) Use chromedriver to log in and interact with the webpage
2) Use a chrome extension to run a content script to "animate" the process (e.g. click the message button, wait 1 second, write the message, wait 1 send, click send)
3) Use the cookie to make network requests directly (? not sure if this is even possible)

The only thing I want to optimize for is to prevent my LinkedIn from being banned.

Any insight?

My initial thought was that chromedriver would be safest because it doesn't modify the DOM. However, how can Linkedin tell that just because the DOM changed, it was due to an automation chrome extension and not Grammarly or Adblock, for example.

On the other hand, surely they could tell whether a click or typed text was user-made or automated

Click to expand...

susocial said:

Go to the Social Media marketplace here in BHW and use the search feature at the top right section for LinkedIn Automation Tool:

View attachment 290724

Make sure you select "This forum" from the dropdown selection and compare between the LinkedIn tools available and which features they have.

Click to expand...

lebronjamesfan said:

On the other hand, surely they could tell whether a click or typed text was user-made or automated

Click to expand...

lebronjamesfan said:

I'm developing a Linkedin automation tool for myself.

Which one is safer, considering I'm doing 20 InMails/day through this:

1) Use chromedriver to log in and interact with the webpage
2) Use a chrome extension to run a content script to "animate" the process (e.g. click the message button, wait 1 second, write the message, wait 1 send, click send)
3) Use the cookie to make network requests directly (? not sure if this is even possible)

The only thing I want to optimize for is to prevent my LinkedIn from being banned.

Any insight?

My initial thought was that chromedriver would be safest because it doesn't modify the DOM. However, how can Linkedin tell that just because the DOM changed, it was due to an automation chrome extension and not Grammarly or Adblock, for example.

On the other hand, surely they could tell whether a click or typed text was user-made or automated

Click to expand...

lebronjamesfan said:

I'm developing a Linkedin automation tool for myself.

Which one is safer, considering I'm doing 20 InMails/day through this:

1) Use chromedriver to log in and interact with the webpage
2) Use a chrome extension to run a content script to "animate" the process (e.g. click the message button, wait 1 second, write the message, wait 1 send, click send)
3) Use the cookie to make network requests directly (? not sure if this is even possible)

The only thing I want to optimize for is to prevent my LinkedIn from being banned.

Any insight?

My initial thought was that chromedriver would be safest because it doesn't modify the DOM. However, how can Linkedin tell that just because the DOM changed, it was due to an automation chrome extension and not Grammarly or Adblock, for example.

On the other hand, surely they could tell whether a click or typed text was user-made or automated

Click to expand...