I'm not sure why we're assuming that the Google search appliance is the same as the Google internal algo (even back in 2009). The basic functions such as crawling is probably very similar but I doubt that there's any additional parallels especially with the index. And when it comes to the index I think that there are two things that we're interested in: ranking and penalty factors.
There might be some ranking info bits in this appliance (we'll never be sure).
The penalty factors from what I understand are applied retroactively against the existing index based on some pattern or footprint, which means that it will not be part of the "index" otherwise the system will automatically "penalize" websites as it "indexes" them.
Anyways, I'm not trying to take away from the OP's work and there might be some value after all, it's just we will never know![]()
I'm not sure why we're assuming that the Google search appliance is the same as the Google internal algo (even back in 2009). The basic functions such as crawling is probably very similar but I doubt that there's any additional parallels especially with the index. And when it comes to the index I think that there are two things that we're interested in: ranking and penalty factors.
Based on the appliance page:
New with 7.0, we've tweaked the secret sauce to dramatically improve those results, and we've made it faster than ever. Go ahead, try it on your "big data".
I guess we want the secret sauce but nowadays the secret sauce for the Internet contains a lot of negative SEO penalties that would not be appropriate for a corporate appliance.
Well in any case this is an interesting exercise that I will follow. Do you have plans to monetize these efforts Gophering?
I do not have any programmimg skills but I am thinking.
If outside man can buy this for a few k how much can he learn from it? Google wont sell their secrets for few milions.
Even if you have the algo you need to crawl and cache a Lot of data = many servers.
Anyway I will follow your thread.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2