Results from different AI content generation methods

Linkbutler

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2020
Messages
445
Reaction score
153
Wanted to show you guys two graphs from search console.
I have two sites, they have pretty much the same stats. I've made a custom tool for content generation, so site has it's own chain prompt flow.

The different is crazy, it honestly proves to me that AI content is fine, but the prompting is extremely important

Site 1:
1.png


Site 2:
2.png
 
wow thats impressive. I created AI content as well and it brought impressions, but the click rate is very low, I think 0.1%. and after about 3-4 months they de-indexed most of my pages and the impressions disappeared.

how do you build it up and ensure real users find it useful?
 
I agree that this is a great example of how prompting and content generation workflows can make a huge difference. Both sites have similar publishing methods, yet one is ranking significantly better and earning far more impressions and clicks. It suggests that AI content itself isn't the issue-it's the quality, structure, relevance and usefulness of the output that matter. The tool is only as good as the process behind it.
 
wow thats impressive. I created AI content as well and it brought impressions, but the click rate is very low, I think 0.1%. and after about 3-4 months they de-indexed most of my pages and the impressions disappeared.

how do you build it up and ensure real users find it useful?
I've been testing a lot, think I've spend at least 500 hours in total :D
I also use multiple LLMs to write it (through their apis ofc, doing it manually would be insane)
 
I’ve also had some sites showing this kind of result before. The problem is, once a Google update hits, some of them drop immediately and never come back

I’d be interested to know how old your sites are.
 
I’ve also had some sites showing this kind of result before. The problem is, once a Google update hits, some of them drop immediately and never come back

I’d be interested to know how old your sites are.
Both sites are 1-2 years old
 
Now there’s your big lesson learned: This really does show that Google isn’t murdering AI-generated content; they’re murdering *lazy* AI-generated content.

Care to offer a quick analysis on how this particular chain prompt works differently (semantic structure, data insertion, or perspective switch)? The forum would love some concrete information like that.
 
Back
Top