Rate this AI generated article

Meerakat

Elite Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2019
Messages
1,505
Reaction score
1,695
Just rate it. This article has been generated by an AI, nothing has been altered by me.

Note: The introduction and jeff bezos part has been copy/pasted from an article in order to let the AI know what the article is going to be about.

Rich (BB code):
The 5 Richest People In the World

The world's wealthiest people all have certain things in common: legendary work ethics, breakthrough ideas, and absolute commitment to their companies. At the time of updating this article, all of the top five wealthiest people founded their own companies, and continue to take an active role in the management of their exorbitant wealth.

1. Jeff Bezos

Founder: Amazon (AMZN)

In 1994, Bezos founded Amazon.com in a garage in Seattle, shortly after he resigned from the hedge fund giant D.E. Shaw. In fact, he had originally pitched the idea of an online bookstore to his former boss David E. Shaw (a rumor that Shaw himself has confirmed), who wasn't interested.

Though Amazon.com originally started out selling books, it has since morphed into a one-stop-shop for everything under the sun, and is arguably the world's most important retailer. At any rate, it is hard to dispute its self-description as the "earth's most customer-centric company." Its pattern of constant diversification is evident in some of its unexpected recent expansions, which include its acquisition of Whole Foods in 2017 and its launching of its own branded over-the-counter drugs in Feb. 2018.

2. Warren Buffett

Founder: Berkshire Hathaway (BRKB)

Buffett is the second richest person on our list, with a net worth of $75 billion. He is also the third-richest person in America, behind Bill Gates and Carlos Slim Helu. The Oracle of Omaha was born in Ohio, but grew up in Nebraska where he attended college at the University of Omaha. In the 1960s, Buffett started working as a stockbroker for his father's firm in Omaha, and quickly rose to become a successful "number cruncher" in the brokerage department. In the 1970s, he dropped "son" from his name to become just "Warren.

Though he built a successful career, Buffett is perhaps best known for his investment strategies, which focus on things such as Benjamin Graham's analysis of companies and the concept of intrinsic value, based on comparisons to companies of similar type and nature, in contrast to the P/E ratio. Though it has been a long time coming, his recent decision to give away the bulk of his fortune to charity through a known entity has helped increase his stature.

3. Bill Gates

Founder: Microsoft (MSFT)

Gates is one of the two richest people in the world, and the fourth-richest person in the world. He has a net worth of $86 billion. Gates was born in a small town near Seattle, the son of an evangelical Protestant minister. At age 16, Gates began attending Harvard University, which he paid for by working as a summer job at the prestigious inn that lent its name to the university's law school. He continued attending the university, and after 2 years he decided to drop out to pursue his career in software.

In 1975, Gates founded Microsoft with the goal of creating a personal computer for the average user. In 1980, he released his first product, a version of the programming language BASIC for the Intel 8080 microprocessor. Though initially unsuccessful, Gates would go on to develop and release many other successful products for the PC, such as Microsoft Word and Excel. Gates is currently the head of a company that produces various software, the largest of these being the Windows operating system.

4. Carlos Slim Helu

Founder: Telmex (TELMEX)

Slim Helu is the fourth richest man in the world, with a net worth of $84 billion. He is the second-richest person in Mexico, after Carlos Slim Domit, and the richest person in all of Latin America. He was born in Guadalajara, Mexico, the son of Luis Slim Helu, a baker.

I haven't tested for plagiarism yet, however due to the introduction it may spit out heavy plagiarism. So, if you are testing for plagiarism; make sure to remove the jeff bezos and the introduction. :)
 
Looks better... Is the tool available to the public?

It is indeed a public tool that is actually used for a different purpose, but I found out it can be used to generate articles by just pasting some introductory line. I'll post about it soon whenever I get the time.
 
The quality is better than paid spinners for sure. I've yet to find an article creating tool that offers great quality, but this looks pretty decent!
 
When your client devours 'engaging content' with $1 budget.
 
3. Bill Gates
Gates is one of the two richest people in the world, and the fourth-richest person in the world.

I wouldn't rely on it.

Maybe, with a bit of editing the content can actually be used. The other information it gathered seems to be correct, in terms of date & location.
 
The problem is that... (there's no problem)

Edit: Should've read OP's OP. Quality's good for autogenerated content.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The problem is that I don't believe the model is comprehending the information, but instead just splicing different single sentence pieces of information that are found elsewhere together.

ie. with neural nets, the beauty of them is that they can find connections in meaning that even we would miss. It's been a large part of the reason for their success, they identify "features" in ways we might do subconsciously, but typically wouldn't do at all.

But this doesn't at all seem like the model has an understanding of each person and is producing insightful information about them. Just connecting sentences its found elsewhere together to make the article.

Sam Lewis' point perfectly shows that. Probably two separate articles when Gates was 2nd richest and 4th richest were scraped and then the information point was combined for both.

It reads well enough, but I think that's because of it taking whole sentences from other articles. ie...

"Though Amazon.com originally started out selling books, it has since morphed into a one-stop-shop for everything under the sun"

This exact line is found:

https://financialnewsspot.com/archives/6164https://thewealthnewsletter.com/the-5-richest-people-in-the-world/https://naijakingdom.com/top-5-richest-people-in-the-world/https://www.wothappen.com/who-is-the-top-5-richest-people-in-the-world/https://www.nairaland.com/4645016/all-worlds-rechords-top-5
.. and another 20 other articles, word for word.

That's not very impressive, and I'm sure Google won't think it's very impressive to take single sentences and mash them together to create an article.

My point is that the only reason it "reads pretty well" is because each sentence is word for word copied out of another article written by a human, not because the model could generate unique sentences with the correct semantic meanings and that were relevant.


Edit: LOL.. just looking a bit closer at the ref articles I posted, the they're the same?/almost the same? in their entirety as the "AI-generated article" you asked us to rate. What's up with that?

An "AI" that can just paste sentences together is virtually worthless imo, maybe as a quick way to rewrite articles without caring about them ranking well. But it's hardly an AI. This certainly wasn't GPT3.

So your assumption is that this so called "AI" generated an article mashed up from other articles?

I would like to see an article that wrote this specific line incorrectly: "Bill Gates Gates is one of the two richest people in the world, and the fourth-richest person in the world. "
 
So your assumption is that this so called "AI" generated an article mashed up from other articles?

I would like to see an article that wrote this specific line incorrectly: "Bill Gates Gates is one of the two richest people in the world, and the fourth-richest person in the world. "
Yeah in hindsight, the intro and first para seem to be carbon copies or other articles, while the rest of the article comes up clean.

Did you use the same method for the whole article or something different for the first two sections? It's super odd that for the first 25% of the content it's copy pasted completely, and then begins creating unique sentences.
 
Yeah in hindsight, the intro and first para seem to be carbon copies or other articles, while the rest of the article comes up clean.

Did you use the same method for the whole article or something different for the first two sections?

The introduction + jeff bezos part is copied in order to let the AI know what the content is going to be about (mentioend it in my thread). From Number 2 onwards, the content is generated uniquely.
 
The introduction + jeff bezos part is copied in order to let the AI know what the content is going to be about (mentioend it in my thread). From Number 2 onwards, the content is generated uniquely.
In that case I stand corrected. Speed-read through your OP.

There are a few things throughout it that are incorrect and don't make sense, but really it's good quality for something autonomously generated.
 
Back
Top