Ranking Idea.. Missing something?

So basically...i had an idea on ranking sites..but i could be missing something . Would like some feedbacks from experts!

Step 1:
Build an empty parasite and prevent ALL from crawling it (prevent google from indexing it). <--This is called NO-INDEXED
Step 2:
Get a money site (or another parasite). <--- This is called MONEY-INDEXED.
Step 3:
301 NO-INDEZED -> MONEY-INDEXED.
Step 4:
Start, continue and never stop to build spam links to NO-INDEXED site.

So basically the situation with a backlinks should be this:
Backlink -> pointing to: NO-INDEXED -> 301 to: MONEY-INDEXED.

The MONEY-INDEXED should rank in some time...and eventually be penalized.

However i think (and don't know if i am missing something) , that only MONEY-INDEXED should be penalized, since the NON-INDEXED site is not in google index in the first place, and has nothing to be penalized for.

Step 5 (after penalty of MONEY-INDEXED):
Build a MONEY-INDEXED2 and redirect NO-INDEXED to MONEY-INDEXED2.
(don't know if i am missing something here also but..) Could this overcome also the "waiting period"?
Basically the original backlink (look at step4) IS OLD in google eyes...and even if it is pointing to a NO-INDEX site, it is still 301'ed to MONEY-INDEXED2..
So MONEY-INDEXED2 should benefit from old aged backlinks?...

I am going to try this!
However would love to see some feedbacks from people with more knowledge than me (not that hard )

Best regards!

sounds interesting.
Subscribing just to see people's views on it

subscribed to see some results with it

I don't think this will work. If the 301ed site isn't indexed in Google, it probably won't pass on any link juice to your money site. However, it works when you let Google index the 301ed site (in my experience).

SEO Power said:

I don't think this will work. If the 301ed site isn't indexed in Google, it probably won't pass on any link juice to your money site. However, it works when you let Google index the 301ed site (in my experience).

Click to expand...

However indexing the 301 site will be pointless (in the regards of the post) since the penalty will get both the 301 and money site.. Am i right with this?

Plus: If you start building the first link to NO-INDEXED when it is already pointing (301) to the MONEY-INDEXED, in the eyes of google NO-INDEXED is always been "moved permanentely" to MONEY-INDEXED (which is indexed..).
I think it is a different situation from when a site (which was indexed) then gets deindexed (probably because penalized) and does not pass link juice..

Looks like a border line situation..i think i just have to test!

Thanks

First, thanks for inviting me for opinion.

Here we go!

Your method is good and in my opinion it should work. The No-Index domain here works as mechanical part of over all strategy. It has nothing to do with "Its indexed or not indexed".

Actually you are building links to your main domain though this "No-Index" domain. Once your main domain get f**ked by google, you can buy a new domain and redirect that "No-Index" domain to that new domain.

The main thing here is, How Long it takes the link juice to pass to your site? Keep me updated on this one.

bronzodriace said:

However indexing the 301 site will be pointless (in the regards of the post) since the penalty will get both the 301 and money site.. Am i right with this?

Plus: If you start building the first link to NO-INDEXED when it is already pointing (301) to the MONEY-INDEXED, in the eyes of google NO-INDEXED is always been "moved permanentely" to MONEY-INDEXED (which is indexed..).
I think it is a different situation from when a site (which was indexed) then gets deindexed (probably because penalized) and does not pass link juice..

Looks like a border line situation..i think i just have to test!

Thanks

Click to expand...

I would have advised you to do the same. As it doesn't appear that anyone has tried this before, I would also like to know what kind of results it will yield.

Basically you almost have the same idea with Sudo's churn and burn.If you didn't do it so far,read it.Just search it on the forum.I would like to try it also btw.

sysco32 said:

Basically you almost have the same idea with Sudo's churn and burn.If you didn't do it so far,read it.Just search it on the forum.I would like to try it also btw.

Click to expand...

You are right. I found his thread and posted to him to have a look at my thread.
I was not sure i understood his idea 100% (cause it's a bit comples), however you are confirming that they are similar.
He had good results. However he uses 3 domains, with 2 redirects. But the main point (deindexed site redirect) is present in his method...which makes me hope!

Hope to see his feedback on this thread. He is a Pro

Thanks for pointing this out for everyone! If someone is intersted in a good read for a similar method:
http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackh...-method-sudos-churn-burn-lead-generation.html

Best regards

To everyone interested, i am about to try this NO-INDEXED ->301->INDEXED MONEY-SITE

Another idea that i have is basically this:
build a website, and send every month a loth of diverified links (with no real money keyword, just url and generic anchors).

Then build your money site, build high pr links (100% money keywords to it), and redirect the other site to money site. When it gets penalized, you can always use the site (with generic anchors) for another redirect and should flow a lot of link juice.

What do you guys think?

Have a nice day

I think you should have tried it first and then shared your results. Now you are not sharing any useful information... I hope you will test your method soon.

I'm a sceptic!

I believe that once you send a ton of spam to that non-indexed redirect it will eventually end up being indexed naturally!

I believe Dale (sudorank) said this method doesn't work anymore. Hopefully, he'll chime in.