Ranking Factors In Google October 2012

Expertpeon said:

I'm trying to understand what you're suggesting here. The keyword density wouldn't have much to do with google being able to detect it as google does not evaluate pages based upon how often words appear for if that's their "target" or not (at least to a point). Google would not sweep through and select any phrases appearing only 1% to n-gram check, as the likelihood those phrases have anything to do with the keyword are basically zero.

3-4-5 word phrases being FOUND does not indicate that the article is unique or non-unique. For instance (as discussed in another thread), I used the phrase "it would destroy colloquialism". However, this phrase does not appear at any time in Google's index, but is a perfectly valid, totally unique, and specific critique of this method. Google has just never indexed this phrase yet.

As such, the computational needs here would have to be extremely large for any article... my guess is upwards of 20-30 checks of 4-5 word phrases in order to establish any sort of useful information. This would be so computationally heavy, that I suspect Google doesn't use it at all.

Click to expand...

moonlighsunligh said:

This is interesting and probably the most important factor of all. I discussed this in great details. It is probable, that Google May determine the theme of the page the back link is created on, and then counted this as the achort text.

So this means that anchor text may be the most important thing, it is onlyvery bad if you go over 30%, because it is a property of a spamy link profile. But, maybe the context of the page is what's counts for other 70%.

So, it should be very important for T1 articles to be about anchor text. If one cannot do that, I think it would be the best practice to include anchor as a keyword several times in the text of the article. So Google will know what is this article about.

A good experiment would be, to see do links with generic anchor text, comming from pages about the targeted keyword, woulf increase rank for the targeted keyword.

Let us know what do you think?

Click to expand...

ficfroc said:

If you do this on all of your T1 anchor text you're going to fall into the over optimisation penalty. wouldn't ya ? At least that's what I think.

Click to expand...

moonlighsunligh said:

No,only the T1 article should be optimised for the keyword. Anchor text should be generic.

I think "effective" anchor text = theme of the article the backlink comes from. Of course, providing real anchor text is generic.

I should mention this is just an aproximation. It is by no means 100% true.

Click to expand...

futurestic06 said:

Actually this article need to be read very carefully. I think Google is changing its algorithm daily. So keeping us up to date is very important.

Click to expand...

Another way of saying this is to have no more than one outbound link (even if it's to your own site) per 250 words.

Click to expand...