RankerX vs GSA
- Thread starter jingsaw
- Start date
jingsaw
Registered Member
- Oct 4, 2016
- 50
- 0
[QUOTE = "Desert90, post: 9981940, Mitglied: 409031"] Was ist PR?
Viele nutzen GSA, meist für qualitative Tier 2 oder Tier 3 Links.
Während Rankerx mehr für Tier 1 ist, aber natürlich brauchst du hq Inhalt. [/ QUOTE]
Hi PR-
PageRank
Viele nutzen GSA, meist für qualitative Tier 2 oder Tier 3 Links.
Während Rankerx mehr für Tier 1 ist, aber natürlich brauchst du hq Inhalt. [/ QUOTE]
Hi PR-
PageRank
- Jan 25, 2009
- 6,378
- 3,774
Again I second that, what is PR? I full know what Page Rank is of course, its that thing that died in 2013, in internet years its the rotary phone of SEO. I make my statements because maybe your just using the terminology, but if your still considering PR an asset then your so far behind you best not use any automation program or your just going to potentially speed up going in the wrong direction.
To answer your question, a lot of people use Ranker X, Ive used it. But I found GSA easier, and when I owned an SEO partnership I got fed up with Ranker X and everyone was like "oh its so much better". I was like you can do great with GSA, and I handed them well done links and the main guy was like "Thats the best links Ive seen from any automation program".
So GSA is useless if you don't take the time to learn it, where Ranker X isn't as versatile so they kind of "hold your hand" more in the right direction. not saying they are bad, but people that say you can only produce low quality links with GSA simply don't know how to use it effectively. Not to mention with the new SER Engines web 2.0s you can pick up a lot of the same stuff as Ranker X. I think you will see, "if" the SER engines launch goes well (its still sort if in beta) that people that understand how to use it will jump ship from Ranker X because its as good or better, easier, and plugs right into GSA giving you more power for less money.
Thats my 2 cents of course, take it or leave it.
Whatever you do, I would really not rely on a someone, including myself, to give you a great answer on which tool is best, you should really be working backwards. Figure out what it is you want, and then be asking "I need to produce X, can GSA or Ranker X produce X". When you approach it from "which is better", your reacting to the situation rather then having a clear plan of action.
Shaunm
Elite Member
- Mar 27, 2014
- 3,435
- 2,998
Pretty much what Loopline said, this is one method of increasing the quality of the targets SER can knock out.
RX is still better at knocking out Web 2.0 platforms than SERE v2 but its still early days for SERE v2.
RX is still better at knocking out Web 2.0 platforms than SERE v2 but its still early days for SERE v2.
bekemew
Supreme Member
- Dec 27, 2015
- 1,202
- 691
Over a year ago, I bought RankerX and started a 30-day campaign. After the campaign is completed, the RankerX campaign sent the following:
- 61 "premium" Web 2.0 tier 1 links to my money site,
- 1523 Web 2.0s/WebProfile tier 2 links to the tier 1 "premium" Web 2.0 links.
Before I started the campaign, my website was on position 16 for its keyword. Now that the campaign is finished, it is on position 7. It has fluctuated during the 30 days RankerX campaign from around 5 - 12. I used a diverse anchor text profile as well.
And It will be great if you use GSA spam into Tier 2 - 3.
- 61 "premium" Web 2.0 tier 1 links to my money site,
- 1523 Web 2.0s/WebProfile tier 2 links to the tier 1 "premium" Web 2.0 links.
Before I started the campaign, my website was on position 16 for its keyword. Now that the campaign is finished, it is on position 7. It has fluctuated during the 30 days RankerX campaign from around 5 - 12. I used a diverse anchor text profile as well.
And It will be great if you use GSA spam into Tier 2 - 3.
bekemew
Supreme Member
- Dec 27, 2015
- 1,202
- 691
+1 vote!
seohug
Regular Member
- Feb 14, 2011
- 395
- 91
RankerX is good at building Premium Web 2.0 links that you can backlink with GSA SER which supports way more link that RankerX and has tons of other functions. When the new SER engines are working well and stable, you probably won't need RankerX.
Last edited:
rogersantos13
Regular Member
- Jul 21, 2012
- 276
- 64
New ser engines what do you mean ? Is there any new softwares ?
seohug
Regular Member
- Feb 14, 2011
- 395
- 91
There are additional SER engines that you can buy as a subscription or one off, or even write them using GSA script. Those add the ability to build links to almost any site or platform
bekemew
Supreme Member
- Dec 27, 2015
- 1,202
- 691
New Ser 2.0, check it out here: https://forum.gsa-online.de/discussion/21415/beta-serengines-2-testing-is-now-ready/p25
clevelandslim
Elite Member
- Nov 15, 2008
- 2,655
- 233
RankerX ...this is a solid piece of software people. It's amazing with lots of new high authority websites. Just give it a try..it's a free trial , easy to use with high success rate. And when you use our beloved GSA SER with it as tier 2 you will get amazing results.
MonkeyClaws13
Junior Member
- May 26, 2017
- 119
- 28
They both can be good for their own tiers. Like others have said, RankerX for tier 1 and two perhaps and GSA for tier 2 or 3 and so on even. That's how I run GSA anyways, for web 2.0 platforms I use in house software.
JinxerCraft
Power Member
- Mar 18, 2017
- 797
- 421
Making a poll would be a nice idea
SEO
Senior Member
- Jan 6, 2017
- 942
- 754
Hey Loopline,
Was it the quality of the content, the quality of the targets or a combination of both? Were they moderated platforms that you passed? Sorry for all the questions, I was just curious to learn more. Did you do it with the stock platforms or with SEREngines? Do you still use SER Engines? I'm kind of on the fence about it. Right now it's cheap, so I want to lock in the price, but I've been watching its development and it looks iffy.
marios_521
Power Member
- Mar 23, 2013
- 709
- 243
Did you send them straight to your money site?
- Jan 25, 2009
- 6,378
- 3,774
I don't use SERengines, I as waiting to go back until they got things sorted.
To be honest, I don't remember if I was using SERengines at the time or not. I know some of it was just stock engines that come with GSA.
I know content was one of the key things they were looking for, mix of anchors, images, videos, all that stuff that "make up" a good looking one for the human eye.
Also they were looking that it was an article based platform and not a guestbook etc..
That aside, Im not sure if they really looked at the domain metrics or not, and I honestly don't remember what they are.
Im not saying GSA or Scrapebox or any tool is the end all. I was just saying that they also aren't "gone with the wind" as some people say they are. Too many people jump from trend to trend without getting to know a good tool, that was probably more my point. I did hate the process of Ranker X, that is to be sure, but then I don't really like things that I can't automate at a high level. Not that I don't do them, but I don;t like them.