RankerX questions?

Is RankerX going to be able to make a few hundred web 2.0s and bookmarks a day?

If I integrate The Best Spinner and something like Kontent Machine will that give me decent Tier 2 content?

I have to buy all of this stuff so it there a better combination to use than TBS and Kontent machine?
I already have all my Tier 1 content.

What I am hoping to do is to import some of the sites I make with RankerX into AutoFill Magic and make them real sites, then use RankerX to do all the Tier 2 and 3 backlinking to those sites from there. If not I can make them all manually in AFM. (or how much do you think I could pay for someone to create and change themes, headers, etc in AFM for 40 or so do-follow blogs)

I was using a large list of domains for web 2.0s that are apparently owned by MR and they deleted all the accounts. Those were WP sites so they required little work to make them look good. Blogs like Jimdo and Jigsy require much more effort. Taht is why I am think a virtual assistant for building these things might be better.

Is TBS and Kontent machine a good solution for Tier 2 and 3?
How much should I pay for a virtual assistant? If it is a lot I can just do it myself but i am lazy and don't want to waste time on this unless I have to.

THank you for considering this question.

Edit:
Which content source has the greatest selction of niches to choose from? I need content in the mental health, self improvement, substance abuse niche. So that might effect your recommendations, if you give one.

Also, the reason I like TBS is because it allows you to build your own niche synonyms. And it is far easier, or it was, to edit by hand. All my Tier 1 articles were made using TBS. But that has been a few years.
I am just now getting back into this after a few years off

Do you do T1 by hand/autofill magic? I didn't undestood this?

Also about advanced web 2.0 properties such as Jigsy - I am not sure if there are available sumitters that can do this, but it is possible to build a script in zennoposter to submit there. If you promote a lot of sites then this is the way to go. IF not VA might be better.

I am not sure about RankerX because I use GSA for T2 +. For content it is much easier and faster to use an automatic article spinner. For example spinning of a 500 word article using TBS usually takes 30 minutes, while with an advanced article spinner - CleverSpinner for example you can spin an article in several seconds, and then possibly invest a few minutes to check if everything looks ok. Thats a time saver.

I had not thought of that. GSA SER has a web 2.0 add on, is that right? Does GSA also have a way to import content from a 3rd party?

It does but I am not sure how good it is. It can import content from some thoird party providers(articlebuilder, wac and so on), but you just need to copy/paste articles and it takes 10 seconds.

schleprock said:

I had not thought of that. GSA SER has a web 2.0 add on, is that right? Does GSA also have a way to import content from a 3rd party?

Click to expand...

Yes, the add on is called SERENGINES, 14,95 per month, right now you can post in around 10 different do-follow websites and 2 other nofollow websites, actually the articles import option inside GSA SER is MUCH better than RankerX with many more features than RankerX.

GSA SER and RankerX have different purposes. RankerX is designed to post to higher quality web 2.0 blogs and SER is designed to post to many different types of platforms. SER is much more advanced than RX but RX, IMO, is much better for T1 links and bulk account creation.

With RX, you will get around 60-70 live high DA web 2,0 blogs and about 250-300 lower quality web 2.0 sites. RX can create accounts and post to WP, Jimdo, Tumblr, Soup, LiveJournal, and other popular sites. It has around 2500 total sites plus you can scrape your own sites from various platforms just like with SER.

I personally use SEO Content Machine and Kontent Machine with Spin Rewriter for T1 and Kontent Machine with the built in spinner for lower tiers. The build in spinner is much faster than the Spin Rewriter API.

To answer your question, RX can make hundreds (probably thousands) of new accounts each day. It's 100x faster than MR (sounds like you're currently using MR). Plus, with RX, you can save all of your blog into a private network and post them over and over (MR does this too but they a lot less sites). SERengines is probably going to be awesome when it's out of beta but for now I don't think it will support a power user who needs hundreds of working blogs daily.

+1 RankerX will create you thousands of accounts a day, that you can easily export and then also use for manual edits/additions.
I am suprised how fast it is, a campaign with like 2000 accounts + wiki + social networks + bookmarks + profiles will take maybe 30-60 minutes to finish only... Try get 2000 backlinks with gsa in an hour? .... not really possible.

also rankerx setup is like instantly... pick sites, keywords, diagram, article list and you can hit start... takes like a minute to setup if you have it a few times. while for gsa ser it will search for hours and you keep getting banned by google after 3 or 4 rounds (i use dynamic ip, not proxies). Also in rankerX u dont even have to add emails manually. In GSA you can use throwaway emails but im not even sure how that fully works tbh... also seems like its using some older trashmails that are banned everywhere.

I have no experience with RankerX. In fact reading this makes me want to test it out/ purchase it. But I wait since I want to read more about and get more information before buying the software. But can mailnesia works with Ranker? I mean it should if I understand it correctly. So Ranker good for tier 2/1?

GSA is more blasting links and perfect for parasite/ tier2/3. Although I do not have a lot of experience with GSA either but that seems the big difference to me.

Try using automated tools from tier 2 and 3 onwards (unless you have experience and are ok if that site gets hit). And both these tools have different functions. I would personally buy a pbn domain every month instead of ranker x and build some manual web 20s to them and then blast those web 20s with GSA (not full spam but tiered blasts). Also you can use those PBNs for other projects too.

RankerX is working really well this days. I am making 20k daily links

Even if you have a PBN I am pretty sure RankerX is awesome for link diversity. No need for tiers and spam, getting those web 2.0 indexed is all that is needed. And use only raw url/ brand as anchor text.

moonlighsunligh said:

Even if you have a PBN I am pretty sure RankerX is awesome for link diversity. No need for tiers and spam, getting those web 2.0 indexed is all that is needed. And use only raw url/ brand as anchor text.

Click to expand...

Your not doing anything to give support to your Tier 1 links? This is the second time I have heard someone say that. If I don't need Tiers 2 and 3 I am happy to stop making them. It just seems that Tier 1 links should have some sites pointing to them for credibility/power.

I pointed a bunch of Tier 1 links to my money site and the PA of all my money sites pages increased. Because of my sites architecture I have pages that receive no traffic that have a PA of 17.

So I figured if it would do that for my money site than pointing some Tier 2 links to my Tier 1 links might do the same for them.

I am hoping by making the Tier 1 links more powerful it will take me from a little traffic to the front page of Google so I can get some more traffic.
Currently very few of my KW that have real traffic are in the top 10 SERP positions, lots of long tail KW that don't have much traffic are, but none of the KWs that really get searched for.

I also know that people don't like PA as a way to rate how a web page is doing but it is all I have for now, so I use it.
I am hoping that by adding backlinks to Tier 1 sites I can increase their PA from 0 or 1 to to 20 or better and that will help put me onto the front page so I can have more traffic.

I am hoping a little more traffic along with a little better backlink profile will get me an even better SERPs so that I can have even more traffic. At some point these things begin to feed on each other. More traffic should mean more natural backlinks.

I don't know if all of that is correct. I don't know. Am I wrong?

yenerich said:

RankerX is working really well this days. I am making 20k daily links

Click to expand...

Awesome, are you pointing these links at Tier 1 backlinks? Do you find it is working effectively to rank the sites?

I was using RankerX directly on the websites, but found it has lost effectiveness in the spring 2017.

PropertyGrow said:

Awesome, are you pointing these links at Tier 1 backlinks? Do you find it is working effectively to rank the sites?

I was using RankerX directly on the websites, but found it has lost effectiveness in the spring 2017.

Click to expand...

I started in late December of 2017. I probably won't be able to see any results for another 2 months. Even then, I may not get any increase..
.......
on the other hand, I have seen some ups and downs in my SERPS. In another 2 months or so I should know for sure. It took about 3 to 5 months to see any increases in my money site, but eventually with just those Tier 1 web 2.0s I made with AFM I got my overall website DA above 40.
I have a page I eventually want to be a landing page that makes money that is a DA 40 and PA 41.
All of that happened with nothing but Tier 1 links that had no PA (so no backlinks). They were web 2.0s with decent DA but no PA for my brand new pages. I am hoping to drive up the value of my Tier 1 links so they can push up my Money Site.

..............
a word of caution about DA and PA. values
I used Moz Bar for my DA + PA values, but I took some of the Tier 1 links and checked their DA and PA and it showed 0 PA and 0 backlinks. I then put the same Tier 1 URL into another backlink checker (it was a free, online checker, just Google it) and it showed that I had several backlinks to my Tier 1 url.
and I use Ranker X premium sites for my Tier 2 and 3s, so they should have shown up in Moz but they did not
So DA and PA are not great indicators of web page strength. Maybe they don't update it very often or something.

arc323 said:

GSA SER and RankerX have different purposes. RankerX is designed to post to higher quality web 2.0 blogs and SER is designed to post to many different types of platforms. SER is much more advanced than RX but RX, IMO, is much better for T1 links and bulk account creation.

With RX, you will get around 60-70 live high DA web 2,0 blogs and about 250-300 lower quality web 2.0 sites. RX can create accounts and post to WP, Jimdo, Tumblr, Soup, LiveJournal, and other popular sites. It has around 2500 total sites plus you can scrape your own sites from various platforms just like with SER.

I personally use SEO Content Machine and Kontent Machine with Spin Rewriter for T1 and Kontent Machine with the built in spinner for lower tiers. The build in spinner is much faster than the Spin Rewriter API.

To answer your question, RX can make hundreds (probably thousands) of new accounts each day. It's 100x faster than MR (sounds like you're currently using MR). Plus, with RX, you can save all of your blog into a private network and post them over and over (MR does this too but they a lot less sites). SERengines is probably going to be awesome when it's out of beta but for now I don't think it will support a power user who needs hundreds of working blogs daily.

Click to expand...

Would you do a campaign for me I can pay. I’m just not sure I would confidently know how to use it myself. Thanks Seb