RankerX questions

I want to try rankerX, I mean I want to create some backlinks to give my new site a little boost (just for starter, later on would be only high quality links)

So here is my questions: (I know they have skype...but they didn't reply yet so I asked here instead)
1. So what do we do after the project is run and finished? I mean the video tutorial on their site was like 40 mins and it's finished. You got around 30-50 high DA web 2.0s and so what next? If you run it on the next 30 days you still get that same domains for the next 30 days right? What's the point doing that here?
I've seen some experiments that say getting more 2-3 backlinks from the same domain benefits more than 1 backlink but it's still weird in my opinion...and I do think weird in google eyes too.

2. They got 7 days free trial. What if I register and use a new email account every time? Or they use the target domain to limit your usage?

1. I think it's no different
2. I dont think they save our domain to database. you can try using VMware and different email to use free trial

1.Just order trial 7 dollar for one week to get answer your question..you can create lots of profiles, so you will get different web2 for your project. Do not forget to buy captcha..
2. I do not know..never do that.

IMO this would not be best usage for RankerX. Using it to create 1 pagers and similar, you can do that with any other tool.

Consider it to make growing and bigger Web 2.0 properties that will not be deleted after a week or removed from index for being low quality. That will/might help ranking on the long run, if done properly even for multiply projects.

At the end of the day it's a tool, like any other tool. Benefits for you (your projects) depends on the usage.

I didn't have a lot of success with re-posting on Ranker X. It seemed like Web 2.0 sites that I tried to publish more than 4-5 articles to over time would always get flagged for deletion. But sites that I only published 1-2 articles on stuck around.

My bigger problem with Ranker X sites is how poor the indexation rate is. That's not Ranker X's fault as a tool. It's just that the sites it publishes to are very hard to get indexed.

scutter said:

My bigger problem with Ranker X sites is how poor the indexation rate is. That's not Ranker X's fault as a tool. It's just that the sites it publishes to are very hard to get indexed.

Click to expand...

This is my concern. I think it depends on how good your spinned contents are.

scutter said:

I didn't have a lot of success with re-posting on Ranker X. It seemed like Web 2.0 sites that I tried to publish more than 4-5 articles to over time would always get flagged for deletion. But sites that I only published 1-2 articles on stuck around.

My bigger problem with Ranker X sites is how poor the indexation rate is. That's not Ranker X's fault as a tool. It's just that the sites it publishes to are very hard to get indexed.

Click to expand...

You try to check Why Your Backlinks Aren’t Indexed?

1. Your content isn’t unique

The content surrounding your backlinks needs to be 100% unique.

That’s because scrapped, spun, or straight up copied content will struggle to get indexed.

Plus, your backlinks will be more effective when you surround them with well-written content.


2. Your backlinks suck
Don’t tell me you’re upset because your social profile or forums links aren’t indexed.

Lower quality/less valuable backlinks do not index well

3. You’re posting on spammy platforms
Don’t expect backlinks from websites without an editorial process to index well.


In my experience, You should use RankerX with a Good Content for your money site. Build a free PBN of web 2.0s and blast Wikis/Web 2.0 Profile and Bookmark on them and then link them to your money site

If you use RankerX to build backlink to your money site, then it's not gonna bring you any good result with high competition keywords . You should only use their PREMIUM sites(wordpress.com, kinja.com, over-blog.com, livejournal.com, skyrock.com, posbit.com, edublog.org, reddit.com, bitly.com, webs.com, iktogo.com, liveinternet.ru,...) and the high DA sites(>50)

Instead, you can use RankerX to build backlinks to your second tier / third tier / your PBN site. Also you can use RankerX to manage your PBN sites, even though there's better alternative

Hope that this can help you

Ranker for Web 2.0.....publik using original article

2. Why not to contribute something to developer, this would be like cheating.

nimdekvan said:

I want to try rankerX, I mean I want to create some backlinks to give my new site a little boost (just for starter, later on would be only high quality links)

So here is my questions: (I know they have skype...but they didn't reply yet so I asked here instead)
1. So what do we do after the project is run and finished? I mean the video tutorial on their site was like 40 mins and it's finished. You got around 30-50 high DA web 2.0s and so what next? If you run it on the next 30 days you still get that same domains for the next 30 days right? What's the point doing that here?
I've seen some experiments that say getting more 2-3 backlinks from the same domain benefits more than 1 backlink but it's still weird in my opinion...and I do think weird in google eyes too.

2. They got 7 days free trial. What if I register and use a new email account every time? Or they use the target domain to limit your usage?

Click to expand...

Let me help you

1. before submission ,
a. you need article scraper
b. you need article spinner
c. you need good proxies
d. you need higher VPS
e. you need captcha resolver
all above, you have to learn it first before using rankerX or some other seo tools. you can ask me where to buy all of stuff to support rankerX or I will tell you on next posting. it will help you to increasing the success rate

2. the tools is worth to bought, I have 5 license with lifetime fee payment on rankerX.

the tools is great for investment

When using blogspot in rankerx, do you need to have the secret word for the username? Maybe the email address w/out the secret word? I asked via skype but the guy didn't understand my question.