RankCipher - new link building tool

Status
Not open for further replies.
Google people!

It looks interesting, but too new to pay for IMO. It offers a lot of features that similar programs don't offer.

I don't think things like keyword research and proxy scrapers need to be built into the same program, but that's just me.

Domain was registered 3 months ago, website looks great, video is very long, who knows how it actually works. Owner looks to be a guy named Azhar. No IBL's from a link building program is interesting.

For a 3 month old website they've accomplished a whole lot, fully functional program, great long video, good sales copy and an LLC. Someone has been busy, I wouldn't be surprised if it's someone who is a member here.
You could've post a link damn it.

Anyways, never heard of it.

Here is the site: https://rankcipher.com/
 
Meanwhile he also increased prices...what a good marketing plan to raise prices when he is still totally unknown and without any genuine review.
 
SEO Crawler tools mimic ‘Googlebot' (in a limited way, it must be said) and crawl and list elements that can be ‘optimised' to make your pages easier to crawl and index properly.
 
I don't think a software that big will do such cheap tactic. Most desktop applications with enhanced security layers and code encryption face such problems because the antivirus gets confused and thinks it's a virus. And making a software whitelist in all antiviruses is a pain in the a$$ (due to extensive documentation required by AV companies).

So It is definitely a false positive from the Antiviruses due to confused/encrypted code. I have contacted their support already about this matter, they told me they are in touch with AV's to whitelist their application.
 
I am one of the beta-testers of the software from past 3 months and I can assure you this is a FALSE POSITIVE. I personally know the developers and they have implemented extensive security measures in the software to secure the code.


I have shifted from GSA to Rankcipher because of it's user-friendliness and it has more features than GSA.


As I am into the PBN industry so it covers all of my needs related to expired domains. I have requested a few features and they have already added into their software within 2-3 days. Awesome Support!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toz
It looks good but we really need to see more feedbacks about the results made by this tool.
 
its crap ive used it a lot, on average out of the hundred accounts it went to build it made 10.

Once they fix that its a tier 2 tool really at best.
 
its crap ive used it a lot, on average out of the hundred accounts it went to build it made 10.

Once they fix that its a tier 2 tool really at best.

i had same problem when i used the software, but after update i am getting like 90-100 web2.0 profiles
 
Last edited:
I think it is overpriced, considered that it is almost unknown...they should go up for steps, the more the gained trust, the higher the price.
 
When I visited the web, it is said that rankcipher early-bird was sold out and will be opened again on April 27th 2016. I'm curious about the price and performance of this tool. Any review?
 
Any more review about this software, please?

Is it better than RankerX or not?
 
I have bought this tool today.. Same like GSA but its not showing any submitted url list

hope they are not thug :)
 
I'm testing this software now. The developer is really putting a lot of work into it to make it better. I've only been using it since this morning so I'm still trying to figure out all the quirks and settings but so far I like it.

I think once this tool has some more development it will be killer. It can post to a lot of the same platforms as GSA SER and also it does premium web 2.0s like Jimdo, WP, Yolasite, etc. You can use site lists just like with SER.

I'm still figuring it all out so I won't comment on the success rate. I'll come back and update once I run a few more projects through it.
 
Does the 2.0 site list get updated to new ones when old are down or gone?

Is that cost in the app
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top