the factor for a new site that has content to rank is time, not backlinks. A friend of mine show me how awseome is his backlink strategy to push a low comp keyword to 30 position make me lol because it's TIME that rank the site, not backlink I believed. If you want to test out backlink strategy do it on a site that's 2-3 months yr old, not a site that has an age of 2 weeks.
rank new site without backlinks
- Thread starter vmh
- Start date
safeSEOboost
Elite Member
- Mar 22, 2010
- 3,277
- 2,273
Google is not going to say, one site is 2 weeks old so it should not get backlinks; but a site that is 2 months can get backlinks. Such threshold does not and cannot exist.
how about start build links after 2 hours after the site is created?
D
Deleted member 657006
Guest
it down to domain age And metrics and article content quilty ...
those keywords are shit becouse in the real world take good seo to hit top and sometimes even pbns this is site getting cash not low crap ...
your friends not making cash from them shit keywords .....
sorry been doing seo since seo been alive and i no if you dont work hard you dont get results or make money
anyway what the post for proving what rank low shit keywords?
those keywords are shit becouse in the real world take good seo to hit top and sometimes even pbns this is site getting cash not low crap ...
your friends not making cash from them shit keywords .....
sorry been doing seo since seo been alive and i no if you dont work hard you dont get results or make money
anyway what the post for proving what rank low shit keywords?
safeSEOboost
Elite Member
- Mar 22, 2010
- 3,277
- 2,273
sounds like you don't need to wait blasting 50 pbns and u can rank the week? seriously mate? lol
so what's your suggestion? build 1000 links, include 100 pbns to a 1 week year old site?
IanV
Regular Member
- Jul 24, 2011
- 493
- 170
I don't know what this thread is for tbh. We know that we have to give time for the sites to rank. If you are saying that we have to wait for 2 to 3 months before we build backlinks because time will rank them anyway, then what is the difference will it make if I don't wait for it?
there's a different, newbie tend to believe the links are strong and the mindset is fixed when it's actually TIME that move those keywords, not the link or even strategy.
RealGibson
Regular Member
- Jul 12, 2017
- 274
- 201
If I ever want to self-induce a headache, I’ll read this thread.
Correct sir, just make a website, sit back and do fuck all, it's the new SEO, haven't you heard? So simple even a moron could do it.
aadelmalik
Regular Member
- Jan 7, 2011
- 446
- 176
I had a site with 6,000 words of content on the homepage and another 30 pages of content all with a perfect silo structure, perfect keyword density, tons of images and dozens of videos on it.
I had something urgent to do so I let the site as is. 6 month later when I checked the site to continue working on it, it’s position is 0. Nowhere to be found.
Your argument is invalid.
Onpage seo is like the foundation of a building. You need a strong one to build higher floors, but if you only build a strong foundation and left it like that you will only have a basement and zero floors.
I had something urgent to do so I let the site as is. 6 month later when I checked the site to continue working on it, it’s position is 0. Nowhere to be found.
Your argument is invalid.
Onpage seo is like the foundation of a building. You need a strong one to build higher floors, but if you only build a strong foundation and left it like that you will only have a basement and zero floors.
- Feb 15, 2016
- 1,245
- 116
Nice example. Make a skyscraper and drink wine in its rooftop garden or left only strong foundation and pray to god that build a building without efforts.