Questions about web 2.0/link building

Backstory:
I have only recently started to learn about IM, and while I feel I'm a quick learner, I think I need some pointers. I have recently bought a niche website from someone on the marketplace, and while I am starting to see a few results, I'm actually doubting this domain and keyword will ever bank me a lot as the niche seems saturated and the keyword doesn't have a lot that can be said about it, so making quality content is hard. Instead, I've been trying to analyse what I got from my seller, to cut out the middle man in the future, and I think I have found a new niche I want to start in as well in the near future(with more possibility of turning it into an authority site eventually). To make this new niche site a success I'm thinking of my SEO strategy and I feel I need some help with this. To illustrate what my strategy is I will make up a scenario below. This is entirely fictional, and is purely to demonstrate my SEO strategy:

Niche: trombone playing for disabled children [NOT MY ACTUAL NICHE, Completely fictional]
keywords: trombone playing, trombone for disabled children, trombone for disabilities
blog posts: about 12 written so far. About 4/5 with my main keyword, and the others try to hit relating keyword strings to rank for multiple searches. I plan to post an article every 2/3 days. (Is that too much? Too little?)

Now, my Tier 1 SEO consists of:
wiki entries, a few high quality .edu links(relating to my niche), guests posts(again, hand picked, relating to my niche, probably 1 per week for the next 12 weeks), 5 web 2.0 blogs (should there be more?)

Tier 2 will be spammy links(blog comments, .edu profiles, forum profiles, etc) linking to my web 2.0 pages to create some sort of pyramid. Should there be a tier 3 somewhere?

My web 2.0 will be things like blogger, wordpress(do they all need to be on different platforms?) etc and will be blogs with about 4/5 (hand written?)articles with topics like: music for disabled children, learning to play trombone, how instruments are great for disabilities, etc
So things that are related to my actual money domain, but not quite the same.

Is this the right way to treat web 2.0? Or am I misunderstanding something? What else can I improve to this strategy to rank? And do I link my posts in my web 2.0 to my main pages, or to actual posts that have something more specific to give to the reader? I understand there are a lot of questions to answer, and I do think I'm on the right track, but I guess I just need someone to confirm and give me a little helping hand. Thanks very much in advance!

I think you should read this thread (started by me), in which I clearly suggest step-by-step how to start a new niche site (backlink building included in this thread)
The problem is I found that your tier 1 was NOT in high quality at all (anyway, I still recommend using Private Blog Network for your tier 1 - because they have very strong backlink profile, so you don't need to build tier 2 even.
Gud luck!

alexnobmmo said:

I think you should read this thread (started by me), in which I clearly suggest step-by-step how to start a new niche site (backlink building included in this thread)
The problem is I found that your tier 1 was NOT in high quality at all (anyway, I still recommend using Private Blog Network for your tier 1 - because they have very strong backlink profile, so you don't need to build tier 2 even.
Gud luck!

Click to expand...

Hi, thanks for your response. I guess what I would ideally like is to have all resources owned by me. I want to learn how to do stuff properly, rather than just buying someones PBN (though, I do agree that this might be a good route to take). Could you maybe send me a message with the link to the thread you mean? I couldn't find it. Thanks!

Does anyone else have any opinions?

Now, my Tier 1 SEO consists of:
wiki entries, a few high quality .edu links(relating to my niche), guests posts(again, hand picked, relating to my niche, probably 1 per week for the next 12 weeks), 5 web 2.0 blogs (should there be more?)

Click to expand...

I would really like to see those hand-picked/quality links....must be out of this world.

Your strategy for finding, picking & posting on wiki's, and for acquiring those edu links?

All you need for tier 1 is 10-20 web 2.0, its really no set number for this just make as many as you need web 2.0s alone usually get you to page 2-3. I use exact anchor for these

Buy some high pr blog comments you can find in the marketplace for $6-$7 I use generic, branded, and url anchor for these

Buy some articles and post them on the linkauthority network. I mix it up with all types of anchor text here, not many exact anchors.

Buy 10-20 PBN post, I use exact anchor for these.

asap1 said:

All you need for tier 1 is 10-20 web 2.0, its really no set number for this just make as many as you need web 2.0s alone usually get you to page 2-3. I use exact anchor for these

Buy some high pr blog comments you can find in the marketplace for $6-$7 I use generic, branded, and url anchor for these

Buy some articles and post them on the linkauthority network. I mix it up with all types of anchor text here, not many exact anchors.

Buy 10-20 PBN post, I use exact anchor for these.

Click to expand...

Thanks for your response. Does it matter what kinda web 2.0 the first tier are? Is it better to use a variety of different ones, ordoes using 10 blogger ones have the same effect? And how do you use the web 2.0's effectively?

Hey Nincyface

Yes! it surely matters the type of first tier Web 2.0s. I think diversification is always good for a back link profile.

Creating a web 2.0 on high PR site with unique content, images and videos is really helpful. Having links from Link Authority network not only add diversification but also helpful in improving your rankings

Using such kind of PBN means you will get contextual backlink from a genuine looking site.