Questions about Tier 3

benman

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
340
Reaction score
39
Hello guys,

I have money site.
I did 1 web 2.0 site until now.

Now I want to make some social bookmarking to the web2.0 site.
So lets say I did 5 Pligg posts. Thats Tier 2.

So I have Tier 1 web 2.0 => Tier 2, 5 Pligg posts.

Tier 3, its all about spam with Scrapebox blog comments.
The question is what should be the URL(I have 5 Pligg posts) and Anchor text on these comments?

Its not make a sense to do backlinks to Pligg posts or on the other hand, for profile forums.
Maybe yes, I am newbie. :o



Thanks in advance,
 
Firstly 1 web 2.0 is not going to get you anywhere unless you want to rank for the term "buy red ford cars that are used in New York". You will need at least 10 to have a strong backlinks profile.

The Scrapebox comments should be generic such as : Click here, for more information, or simply the raw URL The reason why you want generic anchors is because you don't want to rank the Pligg posts, you just want to pass link juice.

If you take a read at the videos here: http://www.matthewwoodward.co.uk/tutorials/the-ultimate-guide-to-tiered-link-building-part-1/

It will help you greatly, I promise!
 
I am planning on making more tier 1 profiles. But, at first I want to understand the link building. Seems like I have difficult on understanding it.

I watched 2 parts from matthew woordward videos.

How can I make backlinks to tier 2? You said about generic keywords but not about the URLs. Where to direct them?
To the pligg post? or maybe to tier 1?


Thanks for help!
 
Sorry the URL's should be directed to the pligg posts with the anchors click here, for more information etc... If you want faster and maybe better results then you could also give your tier 1(your web 2.0s) a small scrapebox blast, but that's gambling because although it doesn't do harm to your money site, the web 2.0 companies sometimes delete your blog for having spam links but results are always good when i do that. It depends on your budget and time really.
 
You don't need to sorry, you are awesome guy. Thanks for your help.

I saw people who made 30 Social Bookmarking for each web 2.0 on tier 1. How they make backlinks to 30 social bookmarking urls? are they make some amount of backlinks to each social bookmark url?
 
Just load all your social bookmarks into scrapebox or xrumer and blast to them. For anchors use mix of keywords and general wording

That will get you random number of backlinks to each social bookmark

also you can make and a tier of wiki links
 
Firstly 1 web 2.0 is not going to get you anywhere unless you want to rank for the term "buy red ford cars that are used in New York". You will need at least 10 to have a strong backlinks profile.
He is most likely just simplifying it so he can understand the answers better.

Well for my answer to the OP, I used to do T3 but not anymore. It is just too time consuming and the benefits are very minimal. But for the keywords, it will be like this.

T0
T1 <-- main anchor or url of T0 or read me, more info, and etc.
T2 <-- keywords related to main anchor. For example, the main keyword car. I will put that in scrapebox keyword scraper and get 100-200 keywords that are related to it.
T3 <-- same as T2 but with lots of main anchor. The link juice is barely noticeable in the serps so I don't mind using main anchor.
 
Thanks for help , innozemec

He is most likely just simplifying it so he can understand the answers better.

Well for my answer to the OP, I used to do T3 but not anymore. It is just too time consuming and the benefits are very minimal. But for the keywords, it will be like this.

T0
T1 <-- main anchor or url of T0 or read me, more info, and etc.
T2 <-- keywords related to main anchor. For example, the main keyword car. I will put that in scrapebox keyword scraper and get 100-200 keywords that are related to it.
T3 <-- same as T2 but with lots of main anchor. The link juice is barely noticeable in the serps so I don't mind using main anchor.

Should I do it too? I will skip the tier 3.
So what I have to do is:
T0 = money site
T1 = Web 2.0 Site with HQ Content, Anchor text with main keyword(money site)
T2 = Social Bookmaring, Article directory, Profile and more with software like Sick Submitter. The keywords will be generic like Read more, For more information... Or maybe just the url to T1.

Am I right?
I feel like I get it.

Thank you so much.
 
i use kw as anchor in tier 3 as well.
importand is that you mix it and not using always the same. I dont see ans advantage not to use the kw in tier 3.

especeally in tier 1 i use a lot of variations.
like if kw is red car ... i use - best red car, red cars, red sportcars, cars in red ... + the url and generic KW.
 
Can you tell me what url you backlink to ?
If I have social bookmarks so I make the backlink to them?
Its not make a sense.

(Tier 3 => Tier 2)
 
Last edited:
Can you tell me what url you backlink to ?
If I have social bookmarks so I make the backlink to them?
Its not make a sense.

(Tier 3 => Tier 2)

Tier 1 : web2.0's
Tier 2 : social bookmarks
Tier3 : wikis/SB blog comments

You can build more web2.0's and bookmark them and for tier 3 use your web2.0 url's along with your website url's(homepage and inner pages) with lots of diversity
 
From my experience, it's safer, equally as effective and a better long term strategy to use more branded domain anchor text (yourmoneysite.com, http://www.youoneysite.com, Your Money Site) than your money keywords (70% branded anchor text, 30% money anchor text) to point to your money site.

Bottom line, in this post-penguin world you have to be extremely cautious about the amount of exact match money anchor text that you throw directly (from Tier 1 links) at you're money site.

Militant control of that exact match anchor text pointing at your money site is CRITICAL.
 
Firstly 1 web 2.0 is not going to get you anywhere unless you want to rank for the term "buy red ford cars that are used in New York". You will need at least 10 to have a strong backlinks profile.

The Scrapebox comments should be generic such as : Click here, for more information, or simply the raw URL The reason why you want generic anchors is because you don't want to rank the Pligg posts, you just want to pass link juice.

If you take a read at the videos here: http://www.matthewwoodward.co.uk/tutorials/the-ultimate-guide-to-tiered-link-building-part-1/

It will help you greatly, I promise!

Aww shucks thanks for the share but please keep it on the forum at www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/...site-google-2-hour-video-tutorial-series.html

Happy to answer any questions but my videos pretty much cover every last detail with no room for interpretation :)
 
Back
Top