Question about Referring Domains

Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
27
Reaction score
8
I've been scraping some expired domains lately and come across a few domains with high metrics like 30-40 TF and 15+ DA/PA.

These domains are usually from very established sites where they accidentally typed in the wrong website, such as wallmart.com instead of walmart.com, tecnology.com instead of technology.com (you get the idea).

That being said, most of these (wrongly typed) domains have only ONE referring domain.

My question is, are they worth anything? Is the expired domain as good as any other high metric domains as long as their backlinks don't get removed? What is the explanation behind the high demand for high referring domains? Are they all for the sake of "so you don't lose the domain's metrics" overnight?
 
Higher numbers of referring domains has a positive correlation with improved rankings, which probably has something to do with it.
 
RD (referring domains) is a good metric (but can be misleading as all of them) of the strength of a domain. So here RD =1 is not high obviously.
 
The number of backlinks and RDs has to look reasonable, it's scary when you see 10k backlinks coming from 20 RDs ( as an example).
 
I've been scraping some expired domains lately and come across a few domains with high metrics like 30-40 TF and 15+ DA/PA.

These domains are usually from very established sites where they accidentally typed in the wrong website, such as wallmart.com instead of walmart.com, tecnology.com instead of technology.com (you get the idea).

That being said, most of these (wrongly typed) domains have only ONE referring domain.

My question is, are they worth anything? Is the expired domain as good as any other high metric domains as long as their backlinks don't get removed? What is the explanation behind the high demand for high referring domains? Are they all for the sake of "so you don't lose the domain's metrics" overnight?
Single ref domain no matter how strong it is simply is not enough to justify building a PBN nor even for 301 redirect. Metrics are meaningless in this case.
 
Higher numbers of referring domains has a positive correlation with improved rankings, which probably has something to do with it.
Are you saying this based on assumptions and speculations or do you have a reference to a proven cast study regarding this?
 
Are you saying this based on assumptions and speculations or do you have a reference to a proven cast study regarding this?
Mate, sometimes common sense is enough. If you have one domain with link from nwtimes.com and another with backlinks from nwtimes.com AND latimes.com you dont need a case study to find out which domain is better..
 
The number of backlinks and RDs has to look reasonable, it's scary when you see 10k backlinks coming from 20 RDs ( as an example).
I doubt you even read my post. Did you just jump in to post a really generic comment to increase post count?
 
Mate, sometimes common sense is enough. If you have one domain with link from nwtimes.com and another with backlinks from nwtimes.com AND latimes.com you dont need a case study to find out which domain is better..
Judging by your "common sense", would you say domain A with 1 backlink from washingtonpost is worth LESSER than domain B with 100+ backlinks from low tier sites (article directories, web2.0, press releases, forum profiles and so on)?
 
Mate, sometimes common sense is enough. If you have one domain with link from nwtimes.com and another with backlinks from nwtimes.com AND latimes.com you dont need a case study to find out which domain is better..
Upon reading your post again... You're asking a no brainer question. Of course the second domain with nwtimes and latimes is much better than your first domain with only 1 link from nwtimes. It's OBVIOUS.

My question is, are expired domains with ONLY 1 link from washingtonpost (DA/PA 15+ and TF 30-40) worth anything?
 
Thanks for the reply. Why is it so?
RD is a measure of strength: starting at 0, then 1, then 2,...100 is decent, 200 strong, 500 impressive, 1k potent, 10k humongous, etc.
So you can see where 1 stands on the scale of things, just next to zero and below 2.
 
Are you saying this based on assumptions and speculations or do you have a reference to a proven cast study regarding this?

Sure. You can read https://backlinko.com/search-engine-ranking if you want to look at numbers supporting that correlation.

Did you just jump in to post a really generic comment to increase post count?

He said, before making three consecutive posts without using the multiquote feature. You better https://i.imgur.com/f0NXSZX.png.
 
RD is a measure of strength: starting at 0, then 1, then 2,...100 is decent, 200 strong, 500 impressive, 1k potent, 10k humongous, etc.
So you can see where 1 stands on the scale of things, just next to zero and below 2.
I mean like sure, of course it's great if you have 100s of backlinks coming from very established sites like techcrunch or gizmodo. It's a no brainer. That domain is probably worth thousands.

Would you consider an expired domain with just only 1 RD and BL from TechCrunch useless even though they have really high metrics (15+DA/PA and 40 Trust Flow)?
 
Upon reading your post again... You're asking a no brainer question. Of course the second domain with nwtimes and latimes is much better than your first domain with only 1 link from nwtimes. It's OBVIOUS.

My question is, are expired domains with ONLY 1 link from washingtonpost (DA/PA 15+ and TF 30-40) worth anything?

Read my post again then. If expired domain with say 30 RDs and link from nwtimes cost about $15-$20, how much would cost domain with ONLY nwtimes link? And the answer is not enough to justify registering the domain ($8-10), hosting ($12 per year at least), building the PBN ($20+). The only viable option is to register the domain for $0.99 using some promo code and use 301 redirect. Otherwise those domains are completely useless regardless of the metrics.
 
Would it be of any difference if that one backlink was from Google itself? (given scenario)
I am saying this for the third time in this thread so this will be my last post, read if carefully:
YES IT IS USELESS.
or let me correct:
THIS IS A DROP OF WATER IN THE LAKE
(note: I did not say ocean)
 
Last edited:
I am saying this for the third time in this thread so this will be my past post, read if carefully:
YES IT IS USELESS.
Would it be of any difference if that one backlink was from Google itself? (given scenario)
 
Sure. You can read https://backlinko.com/search-engine-ranking if you want to look at numbers supporting that correlation.



He said, before making three consecutive posts without using the multiquote feature. You better https://i.imgur.com/f0NXSZX.png.
Thanks for the heads up, Matthew. I'm not too active on the forum here but thanks for the reminder.

I'll look into that case study.
 
Back
Top