Question about expired Web 2.0's

WeWontBeAlone

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
489
Reaction score
40
I've started to use scrapebox to get myself some expired web 2.0's, what metrics should i be looking for? I'm finding a ton of PA25+ mostly like 28, 29, 31 but nothing really higher or lower except for PA01 (80% are these as usual)

Is there a reason I'm finding so many PA26-31? is this some kind of default? Is it worth taking like a PA28 and building a web 2.0 backlink off this or should i only aim for like 40 or 50?
 
By default all tumblers usually have at least 28 PA.

28 PA is pretty much 1 PA for tumblrs.
 
By default all tumblers usually have at least 28 PA.

28 PA is pretty much 1 PA for tumblrs.

Thought so, I knew it was a little too common, what should I be going for then as a bare minimum?
 
Was just doing some research on this earlier today.

https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/how-to-build-your-own-pbn-for-under-275-15-domains.678925/

Suggested: If (PR x 10 + DA + PA + TF + CF) > 80

However, PR is no longer valid. I'm taking PR out of the equation and looking for a combined value of 60 or more, but only ones that have Trust Flow (TF) higher than Citation Flow (CF) and no more than a 5 difference.

Came across another resource which explains metrics:

https://www.serpworx.com/how-to-use/

While doing research on my niche, I'm finding the ones that rank the highest for some fairly competitive keywords, have a very close TF/CF ratio. In other words, if Trust Factor = 21, then Citation Flow should be around (17-20). Hope that helps.
 
So what should I aim for then?

Honestly I dont even use tumblrs anymore, after the url change they aren't that good. Normal web 2.0s get the job done.

Some will say the change didn't do anything, believe it if you want. They didn't do it for no reason.
 
Honestly I dont even use tumblrs anymore, after the url change they aren't that good. Normal web 2.0s get the job done.

Some will say the change didn't do anything, believe it if you want. They didn't do it for no reason.
Can you give example of the normal web 2.0 that works? And what about Putting you link in the header as opposed to within your tumblr posts, the url change didnt affect that
 
Can you give example of the normal web 2.0 that works? And what about Putting you link in the header as opposed to within your tumblr posts, the url change didnt affect that

All the usual web 2.0s people sell work.

The header link is probably the best option.
 
you can check your tumblr backlink if your tumblr baclink is good then you can create a tubmlr is also pa 27 24 but backlink is quality
 
Anyone got a good guide or tutorial for web 2.0s? also
All the usual web 2.0s people sell work.

The header link is probably the best option.

What do you mean in the header?
 
Are tumblrs more effective than getting PBNs in BHW?
 
Hey man, any chance you've got an example of a well done or proper web 2.0 tumblr with a backlink?

No, a header link is the one below the menu or in the sidebar. It depends on the theme.
 
Back
Top