seomaster7890
Regular Member
- May 4, 2024
- 247
- 60
Hello everyone,
I’m considering purchasing a PBN package on a drip-feed basis, but since my perspective differs from the seller’s, I’d like to hear what you think about this.
To clarify, I’m not talking about buying individual PBNs one by one, but purchasing them as part of a package that works like a monthly subscription.
For example, let’s say I buy a 10-PBN package that is set to be placed one at a time every 3 days. It would take 30 days for all 10 to be placed. In my opinion, the billing cycle should start only after all placements are completed — meaning the invoice date should be set 4 weeks after the last one is placed.
When purchasing a single PBN, I agree that it makes sense to start the 4-week billing cycle immediately after that one link is placed. But with a package, shouldn’t the 4-week cycle begin after the entire package has been delivered?
If that’s not the case, then sellers should clearly state whether drip-feed is not allowed, or specify the maximum number of days drip-feed can extend to, so that buyers can make informed decisions.
From the seller’s perspective, they argue that the first PBN placed gets more “free time” since it goes live earlier. But if that’s the case, doesn’t it make more sense to simply sell them individually instead of as a package?
Since I find this logic confusing, I wanted to post here to ask if my understanding is flawed or if others see it the same way.
I’m considering purchasing a PBN package on a drip-feed basis, but since my perspective differs from the seller’s, I’d like to hear what you think about this.
To clarify, I’m not talking about buying individual PBNs one by one, but purchasing them as part of a package that works like a monthly subscription.
For example, let’s say I buy a 10-PBN package that is set to be placed one at a time every 3 days. It would take 30 days for all 10 to be placed. In my opinion, the billing cycle should start only after all placements are completed — meaning the invoice date should be set 4 weeks after the last one is placed.
When purchasing a single PBN, I agree that it makes sense to start the 4-week billing cycle immediately after that one link is placed. But with a package, shouldn’t the 4-week cycle begin after the entire package has been delivered?
If that’s not the case, then sellers should clearly state whether drip-feed is not allowed, or specify the maximum number of days drip-feed can extend to, so that buyers can make informed decisions.
From the seller’s perspective, they argue that the first PBN placed gets more “free time” since it goes live earlier. But if that’s the case, doesn’t it make more sense to simply sell them individually instead of as a package?
Since I find this logic confusing, I wanted to post here to ask if my understanding is flawed or if others see it the same way.
