1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Question about 2.0's

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by azeds, Feb 20, 2014.

  1. azeds

    azeds Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    45
    If you are building 2.0's as your tier 1 what is the chances of them being deindexed by google because of the 'unnatural' back links to those?
     
  2. securelinkbuilding

    securelinkbuilding Jr. VIP Jr. VIP UnGagged Attendee

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2012
    Messages:
    574
    Likes Received:
    260
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Search Engine Optimization Expert
    Location:
    United States
    Home Page:
    Great question! As with anything else, you want to treat these web 2.0's as if they were one of your money sites.

    The higher quality the backlinks, the more likelihood that these buffer sites will survive and go on to pass some serious link juice down the line! [​IMG]
     
  3. tony_d

    tony_d Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2013
    Messages:
    2,581
    Likes Received:
    3,163
    Location:
    1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View CA
    If you stick to the 'powerful' properties, you should be fine. Your biggest risk is indeed of the blog site itself closing down your subdomain, not so much G de-indexing it.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  4. SEO_Alchemy

    SEO_Alchemy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2012
    Messages:
    1,134
    Likes Received:
    1,213
    Location:
    USA
    Check this out:

    http://www.google.com/insidesearch/howsearchworks/fighting-spam.html

    aside from all the injected links and possible a few hacked sites, there's several user created Web 2.0's in that showcase. Meaning google does seek out and de-index Web 2.0 properties. Is it though aggressively backlinking the property or some onpage or combination thereof, who knows. But that's proof enough for me that google does indeed de-index Web 2.0'.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. Laubster

    Laubster Senior Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2013
    Messages:
    1,008
    Likes Received:
    377
    Occupation:
    Self employed
    Location:
    I Travel A Lot
    Home Page:
    Not to steal the thread, but holy shit. I never read that article. No wonder SEO Hosting isn't effective. Everyone using them was putting shitty content on their PBN sites.
    [h=4]Spammy free hosts and dynamic DNS providers[/h]Site is hosted by a free hosting service or dynamic DNS provider that has a significant fraction of spammy content.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1