Question about 2.0's

If you are building 2.0's as your tier 1 what is the chances of them being deindexed by google because of the 'unnatural' back links to those?

Great question! As with anything else, you want to treat these web 2.0's as if they were one of your money sites.

The higher quality the backlinks, the more likelihood that these buffer sites will survive and go on to pass some serious link juice down the line!

If you stick to the 'powerful' properties, you should be fine. Your biggest risk is indeed of the blog site itself closing down your subdomain, not so much G de-indexing it.

tony_d said:

If you stick to the 'powerful' properties, you should be fine. Your biggest risk is indeed of the blog site itself closing down your subdomain, not so much G de-indexing it.

Click to expand...

Check this out:

http://www.google.com/insidesearch/howsearchworks/fighting-spam.html

aside from all the injected links and possible a few hacked sites, there's several user created Web 2.0's in that showcase. Meaning google does seek out and de-index Web 2.0 properties. Is it though aggressively backlinking the property or some onpage or combination thereof, who knows. But that's proof enough for me that google does indeed de-index Web 2.0'.

Not to steal the thread, but holy shit. I never read that article. No wonder SEO Hosting isn't effective. Everyone using them was putting shitty content on their PBN sites.
[h=4]Spammy free hosts and dynamic DNS providers[/h]Site is hosted by a free hosting service or dynamic DNS provider that has a significant fraction of spammy content.