Nicheblogger
Regular Member
- Apr 29, 2014
- 290
- 194
u posted ur last dick pic 3 months ago, no dick picks this week, that doesnt mean ur dick doesnt exist eanymore, it means u just didnt update ur dick picI think the only person misinterpreting anything here is you. How can you give your clients data that does not exist?
u posted ur last dick pic 3 months ago, no dick picks this week, that doesnt mean ur dick doesnt exist eanymore, it means u just didnt update ur dick pic
You should have already notified your clients of the changes to PR and informed them that it is obsolete.
For the last 3 years you have been giving them figures that may not be correct.
You are aware that they stopped publicly updating in 2013 and the news of the no toolbar update was also made sometime ago.
Just drop it from the report or give them all PR 10, if they ask how, just tell them PR stands for Possible Rank
Every metric had its flaws... this is why checking backlinks and analyzing traffic are how many here valuate domains. Metrics are often just a way for people to look for a silver lining on a dog turd. Like "oh, this T1 has crap links, gets no traffic, and has few Google impressions... but its PA is looking great!
For a clients website (and your T1's frankly) the ultimate metric is A) traffic B) impressions and C) rank. If Google respects a site it will get all 3.
how the hell do people on here claim to do SEO when they are clueless to the basics?
PR hasn't been updated since Dec 2013. jfc this is old news. It hasn't been updated, so whatever shows in the toolbar PR is almost 3 years old.
Maybe a bit of topic, and crazy statement, but i have a feeling google will start using PR again without showing it publicly,
Let everybody think its dead so they forget about it
i might be just talking shit but who knows with that G lying b*tch
The article starki posted actually says that too....that Google is still using 'a more complex version' of pr internally but not showing it to us!
checkpagerank.net
The article starki posted actually says that too....that Google is still using 'a more complex version' of pr internally but not showing it to us!