Discussion in 'Pay Per Install' started by veboo, Nov 1, 2014.
it's almost 0.06$ per successful install. mostly form US and Europe + Asia.
Just because you are getting low conversions does not mean an entire market is 'dying'.
I thought PPI was a joke when I tried It, I also only was getting very low conversions.Just a waste of time unless you have massive amounts of traffic.Even Adsense is better,IMO PPI is terrible.
that is not enough for my electric bill..
just because the campaign is not converting for you, does not mean PPI is dying! Diversify your campaigns.
Use PPI as a second source of income, the real money is in PPD (well both are good if you know what your doing) anyway so you set up a PPD file and when they download the file its a PPI so you make extra on top of the PPD.
If I were you I would switch to Amonetize, I get around .40 per install, I think it would work good for you too.
PPI is dead, SEO is dead, CPA is dead.. if it doesn't work it doesn't mean it's dead.. Just switch to another company or work on a new marketing plan to make money..
you should use the right program bro. some ppi companies pay a very low rate for your valuable traffic. i can suggest you a good ppi program that pays very attractive rates if you contact me from skype. i found this ppi company after trying 10 to 15 ppi companies in the market. this works the best for me. dont get disappointed by low paying ppi companies. just select the one that converts the best for you.
contact me from skype for more details: yasudatech
try installerex bro. its better
Rates are getting low day by day
I would suggest going to CPA or PPD in low volume traffic. A knowledgeable marketer know how to incorporate the right monetization. Do not force one way of monetizing things, test it, understand it.
Know your traffic, your audience, your layout and their behavior.
Let me give you an example. I have tons of websites and some of them run on adsense, some on CPM, some on PPI, Some on amazon, and some on CPA.
When my site who is running in PPI is switch to PPD/CPA it has a lower earning monthly than when it is in PPI. I would not go to details but it seems that every install gives me around .05-.06, when in PPD/CPA it gives me around .50-.70 oer download on average. It may seem that the PPI should have lower monthly income than in PPD/CPA but the problem lies in conversion. in every 50,000 UV in PPD/CPA it only gives me around 1%-2% conversion rate. While in PPI it gives me around 50-60% conversion rate on the same UV. (Notice I said UV, not clicks since clicks will not really give you the correct value of things).
Now you can say that I have shitty traffic and I need to get more quality traffic. Well in my point of view, I have just the right traffic for PPI it converts well for me, So why should I change it. If I want to use PPD then I will create a brand new campaign that will suit that monetization.
In the end I get tons of money from testing things out and choosing the optimal value of things.
TL;DR = Stop complaining and test things out. PPI, PPD/CPA, CPC, Affiliate, CPM and any form of monetization needs testing. You are the marketer it is your job to test things out!
Separate names with a comma.