Post penguin 2.0 anchor text profiles

I've been doing some research this week after the penguin 2.0 shake up had settled and the common thread I've seen after watching some of my sites fall, some go up and some recover from a small fall with some high PR links is the anchor text profile.

I know diversification and naked links are nothing new, but all the non-corporate sites I'm seeing at the top of the SERPS, including some very competitive terms, have a large percentage of naked link variants. Anyone else seeing this as a (more) important factor right now than it was pre 2.0?

Real estate is a fairly competitive niche, and this is one of the first "non-corporate" sites that comes up for the term Toronto Real Estate (google.ca results). No, neither of these are mine, though I am in real estate elsewhere.

https://www.majesticseo.com/reports...town-toronto-realestate.com?IndexDataSource=F

Shit site with fuck all backlinks (need to register to see the full picture on these)



This site, one of the only personal sites for "vancouver real estate" on the first page of google.ca has more links, but same idea.

https://www.majesticseo.com/reports...w.thevancouverrealestate.ca?IndexDataSource=F

Tons of diversity and lots of naked links.

As I said before, I know this is nothing new, but in my experience there's a new weight to naked/diversity.

In a word,no.Alot of niches are different,that's why what works for one doesn't for others.The diversity will be a bigger factor than the naked urls.
Oh and get rid of the site identity in your question it was not needed at all(site link at majestic),why do people put urls in public,you're Jnr vip surely you know better.

Is the URL really that big of a deal? I doubt real estate in a major city is a hidden niche and personal branded real estate agent websites with 50 links are pretty unlikely to be managed by anyone here.