Hello fellows, recently i've searched for some high volume niches and end it up on some really good one. However i never focus only on metrics of my competitors. Usually when i inspect niches I go for some "deep" research like what kind of backlinks do they have, age of domains, social presence, how poor or good is their onpage etc etc...
Here is the problem:
5 of the competitors on first page have huge DA and with lots of SPAM. Most of them have blog comments spam while first one is ranked only with 2-3 redirects and few natural links.
I want to know is it going to be pain in the ass to outrank these guys even thought their sites are spammed like crazy (but i must say with really good blog comments,like crazy good TF and CF and insane low OBL)
Second doubt i have (see picture): KW finder probably does not provide accurate volume for month August. It's just showing 90k searches while this niche is really old and never fell below 6 million searches per month for years. Is this error on the kwfinder side or im missing something?
So, what do you think? Any thoughts on this? Can I do it or to skip to some less problematic one...
Here is the problem:
5 of the competitors on first page have huge DA and with lots of SPAM. Most of them have blog comments spam while first one is ranked only with 2-3 redirects and few natural links.
I want to know is it going to be pain in the ass to outrank these guys even thought their sites are spammed like crazy (but i must say with really good blog comments,like crazy good TF and CF and insane low OBL)
Second doubt i have (see picture): KW finder probably does not provide accurate volume for month August. It's just showing 90k searches while this niche is really old and never fell below 6 million searches per month for years. Is this error on the kwfinder side or im missing something?
So, what do you think? Any thoughts on this? Can I do it or to skip to some less problematic one...
Last edited: