Poizon Proxy Processor v1-1.1 (Ultimate Fast Proxy Downloader + Checker)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I need scan rar file in Mcafee enterprise edition but I did not find any problem. Guys check in your anti virus tool.
 
u didnt read what i posted this was a post from
another forum were the tool was removed by admins
for the version posted there being heavily troganed
 
Can OP be more spesific on what is 'ultimately fast' proxy checker? If you ask from me, every windows proxy checker is slow and unreliable.

I don't start self-advertising since I have no sales thread yet but I can tell you that linux proxy checker I coded over a year ago is cabable of testing approx. 600,000 proxy a day per one instance.

As I speak, I've one quadcore machine scanning for new proxies using four instances which results in 2,4M proxy a day speed. The only thread limit in linux is the server hardware and it's internet connection speed ;) It will beat any windows system 5-1 in terms of speed and reliability.

As always, video proof is available at any time if someone doubt im BS'ing.

PS.

Checking Proxy: 209.59.222.57:1080 - 1019812 / 1047184 - 97.39 % |XXX| uptime [d:h:m:s] 1 17 52 26 - Estimated time remaining: 0 days 1 hours 7 minutes 20 seconds
As you can read, in one day and 17 hours it beated one million proxies. Needless to say, i can scan whole ISP ranges in no time.

Many of my servers has been suspended due to this monster speed because it's killing cheap routers. Luckily I've currently host that allows these scans :)
 
Last edited:
Did a quick VT scan and got this:

File name:
PoizonProxyProcessor_v1-v1.1.rar
Submission date:
2011-08-16 18:35:39 (UTC)
Current status:
finished
Result:
2/ 43 (4.7%)

How come this is different to the VT in the first post?
 
Did a quick VT scan and got this:

File name:
PoizonProxyProcessor_v1-v1.1.rar
Submission date:
2011-08-16 18:35:39 (UTC)
Current status:
finished
Result:
2/ 43 (4.7%)

How come this is different to the VT in the first post?

You should also bear in mind that even if it would pass today all major virus scanners tests, if the coder of trojan was good, he can beat all scanners and it could be possibly found later when the damage has already occurred and the guy just got 1k more to this botnet, just like that.

This is why we can read topics here about guys providing a 40k/day mailing proxies (read virused botnet proxies). Same guys are offering DDos services at good prices while they eat honestly working private proxy providers incomes. It sucks.

I simply suggest everyone testing these tools on a virtual server. That way it's pretty much risk free ;)
 
Last edited:
I forgot to add that im using KIS (Kaspersky Internet Security) and proxifier tool for windows. Sometimes it will trigger the event 'suspicious behaviour detected similar to trojans' for proxifier even this tool is not on.

Then i click the option 'allow access but block only dangerous operations' and it goes off. It could be false positive or not. Im trying to say it's hard to determine in the ages of malware what is legit and what is not.

You can get free versions of nice VPS softwares to test suspicius tools. Still though, a wise malware does not trigger instantly. Maybe im too paranoid but it was my 10 cents.

Finally we're getting to word 'trust', a trust is something that must be earned and it does not happend during the same day when a new tool was released.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top