Discussion in 'Cloaking and Content Generators' started by ukescuba, Apr 2, 2008.
anyone a member or previously been a member of plrpro*com?
is it any good?
I was a member for many months, cancelled recently.
The articles were ok but NOT top quality. And the forum was not much value. Initially when the 2 owners started that membership, they were involved on a regular basis but once they achieved success, their involvement in the forum was very very occasional.
Lots of noobs in the forum
thanks - debating whether to sign up or not - noob myself to this plr stuff...
that's discouraging. was contemplating joining myself. now that they are going to be adding hypervre templates to their mix too.
The Hypervre templates were there in 2007, but the new one were not coming on a regular basis.
I am not saying it's not a good membership, only saying that the articles are just ok.
Also, you have to realize that 200 other members will get the same articles. So changing the articles is a must if you want to avoid any duplicate content penalty and changing 440 articles/month can be a real pain unless you have some tools or people to help you.
I found PLRpro to be a good value. Some articles are good, some are ok, a few are not good. You have to rewrite them, anyway. Most important that PLRpro finds niches for you and do keyword research! Also they have really good training videos/ebooks for members. And they have 14 days $1 trial and are honest people - easy cancel and even get a refund if you passed 14 days trial accidentally. Give them a try and see for yourself.
I have a member of plr*pro for some months. I like their content. But, Article*Underground is way good than plr*pro.
I miss Article*Underground Special offer of 2-year content (Previous year & Current Year) for cent on the dollar.
Whenever that offer is repeated again, I buy and share them.
what makes plrpro is better/worse than article underground? Anyone??
I've been a member of both. I like plrpro better as they give you 11 niches with 40 articles in each. AA gives you 400 articles on lots of different subjects so it's really hard to make use if them.
I would would say the article quality is about the same for both, not great just ok.
Separate names with a comma.