Plagiarism vs copy write

What is the difference between plagiarism and copy write of an article?
if you rewrite an article with making plagiarism zero. is that ok? does this affect on rank? in SEO point of view.

everyone does that make sure you do it well

Hawk Eye said:

What is the difference between plagiarism and copy write of an article?
if you rewrite an article with making plagiarism zero. is that ok? does this affect on rank? in SEO point of view.

Click to expand...

If plagiarism is zero, then I believe at the some extend you can be patient. But your article could be unique from the one end and at the same time in should be readable for real users. If you can measure that - that should bring you good results.

Just make sure do it well

Rewrite the article is not plagiarism

If it’s readable and engaging then that’s fine.

Of course, you can use the a lot of form of your creative content. In this reason, the not unique content can be rewriting or formed by the new writer.
Also, people can use the special service, as the texterro. this service can create the special unique content, as you wish

I think that any article is being written for 2 aspects: for search engine algorithms and for real readers.
If your target is SEO than checking for plagiarism is enough.

Just don't use those sentence spinners because Google can see nonsensical articles and never rank it.

What tool do you use for plagiarism check?

Plagiarism is claiming attribution for a work you did not author or using someone else's work without proper attribution.
Copyright infringement is using someone else's work without obtaining their permission.

Hawk Eye said:

What is the difference between plagiarism and copy write of an article?

Click to expand...

If you want to make sure you have Zero plagiarism I would recommend you to use at least 2 various tools.
In case both of them indicates that there is no plagiarism - go ahead and use that text. That won't affect your SEO.

Rewriting an article is not plagiarism.
You can always use plagiarism checkers online and free to be 100% sure.

Google never rank meaningless articles so don't use article spinners

NetShop ISP said:

If you want to make sure you have Zero plagiarism I would recommend you to use at least 2 various tools.
In case both of them indicates that there is no plagiarism - go ahead and use that text. That won't affect your SEO.

Click to expand...

Mate, what your opinion about the Grammarly premium plagiarism checker?

Many people rewrite existing articles, and there's nothing wrong with that so long as you have used your own words and phrases i.e. have not copied their words. If you simply copied their text, even portions of it, and claimed you were the original author, then that is plagiarism.

Even big-time authors research existing bodies of work so they understand the subject matter better and can provide the facts and figures without wholesale copying.

From an SEO point of view, rewriting articles is a good thing i.e. the SE's like fresh well-written content. Just make sure the source material is a trusted source i.e. don't rewrite articles that are full of inaccurate information. Remember, you are trying to provide your visitors with useful, reliable (and well-written) information.

Plagiarism is the copying of information without the author's permission to use it. In the case of plagiarism, copyright is violated, which is a direct violation of the law and the author of the information has the right to request that the copied data be removed from the site.
Copywriting is the use of someone else's idea, because the texts created during rewriting are highly unique. If we consider the information in the network as a whole, then it is impossible to find a unique idea that has not yet been expressed by users. Based on this, we can conclude that all new articles are rewrites.
But there are a lot of topics and niches that are universal, no matter what words they are described. These are areas that we encounter every day, these are topics that have clear factual outlines. How to describe the Solar System for the billionth time, while remaining 100% original?

Plagiarism is the deliberate appropriation of the authorship of someone else's work of science or art, someone else's ideas or inventions. Plagiarism may even be a violation of copyright law. That's the main difference from copywriting I think

Copywriting is a marketing tool: the creation of advertising articles that encourage the reader to perform a targeted action: purchase, subscription, application, and so on. But with the development of the Internet, copywriting began to be called any work on text content — both commercial articles and informational ones.
Rewriting is the reworking of a finished article.

Plagiarism is a blanket term for copying somebody's content directly or the idea for their content.

In the academic world, you get accused of plagiarism not just in cases where you copy and paste somebody else's work without giving them credit, but you also get penalized for lifting their ideas.

This is what got Martin Luther King, Jr. in trouble. He got into the habit of using other people's ideas in his dissertation without proper attribution.

On the other hand, the copyright is more specific to the form of the content.

For example, if I write an article using a particular sentence structure and stringing certain words together, I can copyright that.

If you copy and paste it, I can sue you, or I can get your server to pull your content from the internet.

But if you were to take my ideas or the information that I have presented in my article and [/b]put it in your own words[/b], that isn't covered by copyright.

Generally speaking, that is not covered by copyright unless you can argue that this is derivative content. In other words, I could not have made this piece of content without your stuff.

But that's really hard to prove because, on the internet, it seems that content you find in one place is actually just a mishmash of information found elsewhere but presented in a person's unique words.

For SEO purposes, duplicate content is the main issue.

So if you're just going to copy and paste somebody else's work, chances are, Google will show your content result below the original. Google's algorithm is structured to reward the "original instance" of the content with a higher ranking.

This doesn't always work.

In fact, the guys from <b>Income School</b> are complaining that some people are copying new posts to their website before it gets indexed.

So what happens is that these copies get indexed first.

But, of course, since the Income School guys own the copyright to that material, they can always sue or put pressure on the server hosting those pages to get them taken down.

Still, it's a massive headache.