phone verifications on ipv6
- Thread starter proxified
- Start date
proxified
Elite Member
- Aug 16, 2009
- 2,651
- 1,979
So to be clear;
You created accounts on IPv6 proxies and they are still on the same proxies, they get phone blocks for you purpose.
You created other accounts on IPv4 residential and those are still on the same proxies, they don't get phone blocks for you purpose.
Is this correct?
You made it pretty unclear
You created accounts on IPv6 proxies and they are still on the same proxies, they get phone blocks for you purpose. - YES
You created other accounts on IPv4 residential and those are still on the same proxies, they don't get phone blocks for you purpose. - NO, I created these on ipv4 residential but using on ipv6 proxies and they're working fine with no phone verifications at all.
None of the accounts have any link in bio as of yet.
tux
Elite Member
- Jul 11, 2016
- 1,706
- 1,246
I assume you are referring that all accounts have their own /64 ? If yes then I assume you created 100+ accounts on a single /56 ? If yes then that's a big footprint , especially because you must've created all of them in a week.
Need more specifics like how are you using the accounts say - one account per /64 and you divided a /48 subnet
Need more specifics like how are you using the accounts say - one account per /64 and you divided a /48 subnet
proxified
Elite Member
- Aug 16, 2009
- 2,651
- 1,979
Well I am not sure but I believe that's not the issue really since I have heard this from quite alot of people that creating accounts on ipv6 and using them on ipv6 is a pain because of phone verifications. But until now I haven't been able to find a solution to this problem. Surely this has nothing to do with the subnet since I used IP's randomly and i have 1000's of these proxies.
tux
Elite Member
- Jul 11, 2016
- 1,706
- 1,246
again its not about ips, its about subnets . I run tons of accounts on ipv6 with just 1-2 pv's in a month. You need to be more specific before any of us can help you
example -
2001:db8:0:27::/64
2001:db8:0:1::/64
2001:db8:0:2::/64
2001:db8:0:3::/64
2001:db8:0:4::/64
2001:db8:0:5::/64
2001:db8:0:6::/64
2001:db8:0:7::/64
2001:db8:0:8::/64
2001:db8:0:9::/64
2001:db8:0:a::/64
2001:db8:0:b::/64
2001:db8:0:c::/64
2001:db8:0:d::/64
2001:db8:0:e::/64
2001:db8:0:f::/64
comes from same 56 , no matter how many randomisations you do in the last 4 octet
Insta noob
BANNED
- Nov 24, 2018
- 73
- 34
hey, @proxified did you found any solution for this?
