Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi Licorne101/CloneX
I installed my copy a few days ago on my VPS, after i updated to latest version it's telling me to activate again, something about hardware change?
I don't want to end up paying $5 to reactivate every time, what's the problem?
Thanks
PS. I did send a email to support but no answer.



Please every time i see the name VenomSEO my blood boils...

Please hold on for at least a day for support to reply, to account for time zone differences. Rest assured, your concern will be handled!
 
My suggestion (features request):

1. If you tried XRumer before, you see it has a learning mode and it logged all unknown fields sorted desc by the number of times that field appear in the process, then we just open the log window and teach it what to fill in these fields.
2. Can we set the number of accounts we want to create per site on the list?
3. Can we use Licorne as a reply machine to forums? (register -> verify -> reply to a specific thread) Or we can create a thread using account 1 then use other accounts to reply to that thread. This is just an ex.

It would be nice to have these features on Licorne.
 
Last edited:
Without having any numbers on how successful you are with sales and stuff, I would expect this thread to have like 100 pages already. It's good software.

Here's things I would like to see:
- Separate web 2.0 submission task. If I add images and videos to my web 2.0s, it would like weird in the article submission.
- Same with wiki. A separate wiki submission task.
- The ability to right click a word and "insert a link" within the web 2.0 submission task.
- The ability to add a "subdomain" name to the web 2.0's (for those networks who have that option)
- The ability to edit tasks when the submitter is running.
- Instead of having to tick the box to the left when you want to edit and generate a report or something, it should be enough to have the task highlighted in order to edit task or do whatever.
- At the very left you have 4 clickable things under "main". It's logging, proxies, email and pinger. Add one called "output url's" or something so we can access all our link lists easily. Will make it more user-friendly and easy to navigate.
 
Without having any numbers on how successful you are with sales and stuff, I would expect this thread to have like 100 pages already. It's good software.

Here's things I would like to see:
- Separate web 2.0 submission task. If I add images and videos to my web 2.0s, it would like weird in the article submission.
- Same with wiki. A separate wiki submission task.
- The ability to right click a word and "insert a link" within the web 2.0 submission task.
- The ability to add a "subdomain" name to the web 2.0's (for those networks who have that option)
- The ability to edit tasks when the submitter is running.
- Instead of having to tick the box to the left when you want to edit and generate a report or something, it should be enough to have the task highlighted in order to edit task or do whatever.
- At the very left you have 4 clickable things under "main". It's logging, proxies, email and pinger. Add one called "output url's" or something so we can access all our link lists easily. Will make it more user-friendly and easy to navigate.

Thanks for the list of suggestions! We will try to include as many as we possibly could in the next update.

My suggestion (features request):

1. If you tried XRumer before, you see it has a learning mode and it logged all unknown fields sorted desc by the number of times that field appear in the process, then we just open the log window and teach it what to fill in these fields.
2. Can we set the number of accounts we want to create per site on the list?
3. Can we use Licorne as a reply machine to forums? (register -> verify -> reply to a specific thread) Or we can create a thread using account 1 then use other accounts to reply to that thread. This is just an ex.

It would be nice to have these features on Licorne.

1. Licorne Cosmic does that. After you have performed the test automation you will be asked the specify what value LAIO supposed to fill in for every fields found in the form. Eg: You would specify that reg_username is the field accepting username while agree_terms is a static field where the value will always be the same.
2. Not at the moment. We may work on it after we come up with diagramming module.
3. We don't plan to add this feature since we want to make LAIO focus on basic automation in the sense that everything should be fixed to the flow register -> verify -> submit content -> retrieve live links while yours is way more advanced than that.

When you need license transfer just shoot us an email at [email protected] and we will get everything sorted out for you (for free of course). :)
 
Thanks for the list of suggestions! We will try to include as many as we possibly could in the next update.



1. Licorne Cosmic does that. After you have performed the test automation you will be asked the specify what value LAIO supposed to fill in for every fields found in the form. Eg: You would specify that reg_username is the field accepting username while agree_terms is a static field where the value will always be the same.
2. Not at the moment. We may work on it after we come up with diagramming module.
3. We don't plan to add this feature since we want to make LAIO focus on basic automation in the sense that everything should be fixed to the flow register -> verify -> submit content -> retrieve live links while yours is way more advanced than that.

When you need license transfer just shoot us an email at [email protected] and we will get everything sorted out for you (for free of course). :)

1. No, I mean collecting unknown fields across all urls that processed. For ex. not all forums has a field like BIO, YIM, Skype, etc... Just collect the unknown fields (untrained) the let us select what to put to these fields just like XRumer. Have you ever try XRumer? It has some freaking awesome features that you can implement into Licorne!

2. Is ok, nothing urgent.

3. Replying to threads are easy and flowing well with the current version, for ex. I scrape forum's thread urls ready and add to a list then Licorne can do exactly as what it does right now but just submit to a different post_url (ex: reply.php?p=134423). It's just the same as posting a new thread.
 
Last edited:
1. No, I mean collecting unknown fields across all urls that processed. For ex. not all forums has a field like BIO, YIM, Skype, etc... Just collect the unknown fields (untrained) the let us select what to put to these fields just like XRumer. Have you ever try XRumer? It has some freaking awesome features that you can implement into Licorne!

2. Is ok, nothing urgent.

3. Replying to threads are easy and flowing well with the current version, for ex. I scrape forum's thread urls ready and add to a list then Licorne can do exactly as what it does right now but just submit to a different post_url (ex: reply.php?p=134423). It's just the same as posting a new thread.

That is a very good suggestion. We once thought of doing something similar. Collecting all processed fields then heuristically determine the field type based on known footprints (eg: fields with type attribute value 'password' would 100% be asking for a password, fields with name attribute value containing 'f' and 'name' are very likely to be asking for first name. Then for the fields which we are not able to determine using various heuristic approaches we would prompt user to manually specify the field type. In the future when we plan to improve Licorne Cosmic module, we will definitely work on getting that technology included.

Replying to a random thread is easy, since we can make LAIO randomly fetch a forum thread URL and simply post reply to it, but replying to a specific thread involves a little bit of scraping and may complicate the current flow, unless we allow users to paste the list of threads to reply to during task creation. It sounds like a good suggestion but if we ever add it into LAIO it will be under a separate module.
 
That is a very good suggestion. We once thought of doing something similar. Collecting all processed fields then heuristically determine the field type based on known footprints (eg: fields with type attribute value 'password' would 100% be asking for a password, fields with name attribute value containing 'f' and 'name' are very likely to be asking for first name. Then for the fields which we are not able to determine using various heuristic approaches we would prompt user to manually specify the field type. In the future when we plan to improve Licorne Cosmic module, we will definitely work on getting that technology included.

Replying to a random thread is easy, since we can make LAIO randomly fetch a forum thread URL and simply post reply to it, but replying to a specific thread involves a little bit of scraping and may complicate the current flow, unless we allow users to paste the list of threads to reply to during task creation. It sounds like a good suggestion but if we ever add it into LAIO it will be under a separate module.

Sweet Licorne! Hope it can be implemented into this monster, it will be very useful for non-SEO guys like me ... means more sales (hell lot more sales :p) if you can make it benefit the social marketing fans :D
 
Last edited:
I'm almost done with my 5 day trial and here are my thoughts on the software:

The good:
- I was psyched at first, after reading all the posts in here
- The software looks amazingly well thought and built
- The price tag looked ridiculously good
- The speed of the software is really nice

The bad:
- The software lacks certain features that could actually make it a competitor of UD (I'm not going to list them here, they've already been listed in previous posts)
- The submission rates are abysmal. I know that with automation tools these rates are under 50%, but this is absurd. Even with custom scraped lists, I wasn't able to get a 10% submission rate. The software was mostly unable to complete the submission process. Mind you, my specs are: core i3, 2.4Ghz with 16GB of Ram, 100GB/s Internet Connection and 100 private proxies ( <500ms) so I don't think it could be a problem on my end.
- The captcha capturing system (the part that handles the captcha on a page and sends it to a decaptcha service [CS, GSA CB, decaptcher, etc] is faulty - at least from what I can tell. I've ran the software with CS and out of 2550 sites (all with captcha, verified using another software) it managed to submit only 300 to CS. I don't know why this is happening, but just thought I'd put it out there.

All in all, for the price tag, I think it's a promising software.
 
I'm almost done with my 5 day trial and here are my thoughts on the software:

The good:
- I was psyched at first, after reading all the posts in here
- The software looks amazingly well thought and built
- The price tag looked ridiculously good
- The speed of the software is really nice

The bad:
- The software lacks certain features that could actually make it a competitor of UD (I'm not going to list them here, they've already been listed in previous posts)
- The submission rates are abysmal. I know that with automation tools these rates are under 50%, but this is absurd. Even with custom scraped lists, I wasn't able to get a 10% submission rate. The software was mostly unable to complete the submission process. Mind you, my specs are: core i3, 2.4Ghz with 16GB of Ram, 100GB/s Internet Connection and 100 private proxies ( <500ms) so I don't think it could be a problem on my end.
- The captcha capturing system (the part that handles the captcha on a page and sends it to a decaptcha service [CS, GSA CB, decaptcher, etc] is faulty - at least from what I can tell. I've ran the software with CS and out of 2550 sites (all with captcha, verified using another software) it managed to submit only 300 to CS. I don't know why this is happening, but just thought I'd put it out there.

All in all, for the price tag, I think it's a promising software.

Thanks for reviewing LAIO. Could you please send us your lists you used at [email protected] so we can replicate the issues and fix it?
 
I'm almost done with my 5 day trial and here are my thoughts on the software:

The good:
- I was psyched at first, after reading all the posts in here
- The software looks amazingly well thought and built
- The price tag looked ridiculously good
- The speed of the software is really nice

The bad:
- The software lacks certain features that could actually make it a competitor of UD (I'm not going to list them here, they've already been listed in previous posts)
- The submission rates are abysmal. I know that with automation tools these rates are under 50%, but this is absurd. Even with custom scraped lists, I wasn't able to get a 10% submission rate. The software was mostly unable to complete the submission process. Mind you, my specs are: core i3, 2.4Ghz with 16GB of Ram, 100GB/s Internet Connection and 100 private proxies ( <500ms) so I don't think it could be a problem on my end.
- The captcha capturing system (the part that handles the captcha on a page and sends it to a decaptcha service [CS, GSA CB, decaptcher, etc] is faulty - at least from what I can tell. I've ran the software with CS and out of 2550 sites (all with captcha, verified using another software) it managed to submit only 300 to CS. I don't know why this is happening, but just thought I'd put it out there.

All in all, for the price tag, I think it's a promising software.
You were submitting to social bookmarks? With CS 300 sounds about right because most of the sites use recaptcha.
 
Been playing around with this tool for a while now and I'm really starting to love it! It's made my job of getting tier 3 links so much easier. I spend 1 hour just cloning tasks and then leave it to run for a week creating hundreds of thousands of links just like that. So much more "autopilot" than UD. I have not found a way to integrate this into my tier 1 MNS linking strategy yet, but that's something I'm going to do once I learn how to control the software better.

Right now I haven't really found out how to set categories for my article submissions (maybe I'm just blind lol) and which platforms allow html (can't risk html showing up in my MNS tier 1s).

Also, would it be possible to add a feature in the future that allows us to provide a list of websites to remove from our site list? With UD, I tend to export all my sites once a month, check them all on scrapebox to see if any of them are de-indexed/flagged for malware, and then enter this negative list back in and allow the software to remove it from the database. Would be really neat if Licorne was able to do this too :D
 
Been playing around with this tool for a while now and I'm really starting to love it! It's made my job of getting tier 3 links so much easier. I spend 1 hour just cloning tasks and then leave it to run for a week creating hundreds of thousands of links just like that. So much more "autopilot" than UD. I have not found a way to integrate this into my tier 1 MNS linking strategy yet, but that's something I'm going to do once I learn how to control the software better.

Right now I haven't really found out how to set categories for my article submissions (maybe I'm just blind lol) and which platforms allow html (can't risk html showing up in my MNS tier 1s).

Also, would it be possible to add a feature in the future that allows us to provide a list of websites to remove from our site list? With UD, I tend to export all my sites once a month, check them all on scrapebox to see if any of them are de-indexed/flagged for malware, and then enter this negative list back in and allow the software to remove it from the database. Would be really neat if Licorne was able to do this too :D

Awesome suggestion. You will see it in the next version. ;)
 
Nope, jCow mostly

In that case, would you mind to provide us a sample list of your custom scraped sites? We do not need the whole list, just provide us with 100 - 200 of them and that should be enough to give us a basic idea of what's causing your submissions to fail that much.
 
Also, would it be possible to add a feature in the future that allows us to provide a list of websites to remove from our site list? With UD, I tend to export all my sites once a month, check them all on scrapebox to see if any of them are de-indexed/flagged for malware, and then enter this negative list back in and allow the software to remove it from the database. Would be really neat if Licorne was able to do this too :D
I was looking for something like this just yesterday.
 
That is strange. I get close to 50% on freshly scraped lists using CB for captcha.

I also get pretty high success rate compared to other submitters. However, my lists are not freshly scraped. They have been filtered over and over for quite a while so only the really good ones remain. I've set the Licorne on my vps to use only CS.
 
Yes, you probably have to constantly scrape new lists and filter them out. I've noticed Licorne AIO has a setting for including in your account creation / submission tasks only lists that have a health above a % so I guess that's useful.

I also get pretty high success rate compared to other submitters. However, my lists are not freshly scraped. They have been filtered over and over for quite a while so only the really good ones remain. I've set the Licorne on my vps to use only CS.
 
Yes and this is what we do to trim our list of scraped sites:

1. Manage Sites -> Add Sites, paste the list of scraped sites, give the list a unique name. Eg: Pligg1 then click add and let it process the sites.
2. Create an account creation task and select only sites under the list Pligg1 (Search by List Name -> Select all) then add task.
3. Start submitter and let LAIO create accounts on the sites.
4. Create a bookmark submission task and let LAIO submit to all registered accounts/sites under Pligg1.
5. Manage sites -> specify to show only sites under the list Pligg1 then remove sites with registration and submission health lower than or equals to 80.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top