Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread
- Thread starter jimbobo2779
- Start date
- Status
Was already doing the checking every 30 minutes. Buy Proxies gave me another set of 50, of which 7 were bad when I checked and they replaced them. I changed the time between searches from 30000 ms to 35000 ms. After some time, maybe 2 hours I can't rem exactly, I was back down to 30 working. I dropped Buy Proxies and am trying another provider to see if that makes a difference.
- Sep 17, 2008
- 6,037
- 3,974
How many search threads are you using with your 50 proxies?
I have it set to 6 because I know the 50 will soon just be 30.
- Sep 17, 2008
- 6,037
- 3,974
To be honest I am really surprised that you are having so many proxies get burnt out so quickly, I will look into the checker today in case there is something going on with the way they are being checked.
I try to stay away from Skype as I just get bombarded with questions, if you have any questions you can ask them here and I will answer them pretty quickly or if there are personal questions you can ask them via PM or email.
- Sep 17, 2008
- 6,037
- 3,974
Its been a while since I posted update notes so here we go:
v2.17.3.0
v2.17.4.0
v2.17.5.0
v2.17.6.0
As often is the case most of these updates are the result of users requests so if you have a feature request then post here or even if you are having an issue with something and you feel it is not working how it should then let me know and I will do my best to get it fixed up as soon as possible.
Updates are put out every few days most of the time.
v2.17.3.0
v2.17.4.0
v2.17.5.0
v2.17.6.0
As often is the case most of these updates are the result of users requests so if you have a feature request then post here or even if you are having an issue with something and you feel it is not working how it should then let me know and I will do my best to get it fixed up as soon as possible.
Updates are put out every few days most of the time.
cody41
Power Member
- Jun 18, 2009
- 691
- 276
Sorry for the late response, I've been out and about with the family on my offtime.
1) I don't think Jim is having NHSEO scrape pr the way I think he is so that it burns out on google bans to determine if a site has a certain pr..or are you Jim? Are you pulling PR from the cache site/page listing or are you doing it on the live site Jim? But I guess in essence it doesn't bother me to much since I have strict OBL limits. When it does find a site that meets my criteria and pulls PR to check, there is so few of them per hour that it won't burn out..which is good. Again, i'm strict with my link placement so as to avoid the shock and awe link dumpage. Not saying it "won't work" but i'm saying for me, I'm just being strict with the software usage. I don't have my teamviewer in front of my right now to see my laptop, but the last time i looked I had 80 something good links from the other day? That's fine by me!
2) Correct for anchor usage, I'm using lsi variations for keyword phrases. Google is smart enough NOW to know what your site is about and will actually rank you for the terms that you WOULD put down as anchor text, if that makes sense. I have one site that ranks for "widget keyword category". But you know what? The only term of those three terms that appears ANYWHERE in both the copytext,metadata and anywhere there is text is the term WIDGET. How the hell did it know to pick up on keyword and category? It's my belief (and verified by my gut and some testing) that once google crawls your site and plugs what the site/page is about into its index, it's already built a topological graph about what your site is all about and where it fits into the hierarchy of information within its index to some extent. Hence why I tell people to build for overall information and not just for keywords anymore.
You'll get a lot of people still saying generic% this, and anchor text that, but they and myself, are all grasping at straws. We'll never know unless we find out what works for us through proper testing and metric tracking.
Oh, to follow back on your point about comments and lsi, that would be great to do if you can get away with it. I sometimes leave the good ole generic text that may contain a spun keyword here and there about what site I just came from to leave a link, and then mention an LSI keyword in that.
Hope that helps
1) I don't think Jim is having NHSEO scrape pr the way I think he is so that it burns out on google bans to determine if a site has a certain pr..or are you Jim? Are you pulling PR from the cache site/page listing or are you doing it on the live site Jim? But I guess in essence it doesn't bother me to much since I have strict OBL limits. When it does find a site that meets my criteria and pulls PR to check, there is so few of them per hour that it won't burn out..which is good. Again, i'm strict with my link placement so as to avoid the shock and awe link dumpage. Not saying it "won't work" but i'm saying for me, I'm just being strict with the software usage. I don't have my teamviewer in front of my right now to see my laptop, but the last time i looked I had 80 something good links from the other day? That's fine by me!
2) Correct for anchor usage, I'm using lsi variations for keyword phrases. Google is smart enough NOW to know what your site is about and will actually rank you for the terms that you WOULD put down as anchor text, if that makes sense. I have one site that ranks for "widget keyword category". But you know what? The only term of those three terms that appears ANYWHERE in both the copytext,metadata and anywhere there is text is the term WIDGET. How the hell did it know to pick up on keyword and category? It's my belief (and verified by my gut and some testing) that once google crawls your site and plugs what the site/page is about into its index, it's already built a topological graph about what your site is all about and where it fits into the hierarchy of information within its index to some extent. Hence why I tell people to build for overall information and not just for keywords anymore.
You'll get a lot of people still saying generic% this, and anchor text that, but they and myself, are all grasping at straws. We'll never know unless we find out what works for us through proper testing and metric tracking.
Oh, to follow back on your point about comments and lsi, that would be great to do if you can get away with it. I sometimes leave the good ole generic text that may contain a spun keyword here and there about what site I just came from to leave a link, and then mention an LSI keyword in that.
Hope that helps
I have the minimum PR set to 0, so this shouldn't causing any issues I would assume. I was thinking about limiting the searches by PR, but if I am having issues now that might make it worse. Only thing I can think of is that just having a delay (35 secs. in my case) setting between searches does not randomize the searches and Google bans the IP with repeated searches. But if this was the case, why isn't anyone else having issues? Or proxies from Buy Proxies are not that good, but from everything I have read on BHW makes me think they are one of the better providers.
Anyway, I let my proxy subscription lapse so NHSEO has been idle for the past couple of days. I thought private proxies was the way to go. Maybe I might have to try the software proxy scraping solution. I just can't spend any more time on worrying about it right now. I will revisit when I get a chance.
Thanks for the suggestion Cody.
Thanks a lot for your reply, Cody, much appreciated. From looking through the logs, you appear to be correct that NHS seems to pick up the PR from the live site since the OBL count appears to have a higher priority, which would make sense why it's pretty hard to burn through IPs when using a strict OBL limit. I could be talking out of my a$$ with that previous sentence so would be great if Jim could confirm.
Without proxies, how many threads (posting/searching) are you using?
Interesting observations regarding LSI...when you look into webmaster tools (google index > content keywords), are these the LSI terms G thinks your site is about? The following sounds stupid but is there a way to make google think your site is about keywords xyz or is the only thing you can do write broadly on a topic and hope G picks up what you hope to rank for?
Anyway, thanks for your insight. Considering penguin 2.1, I think you're on a good way with the strict requirements on link building software usage. The general consensus seems to be low # of quality links > high # of average links (well, hasn't it always been like that?).
Without proxies, how many threads (posting/searching) are you using?
Interesting observations regarding LSI...when you look into webmaster tools (google index > content keywords), are these the LSI terms G thinks your site is about? The following sounds stupid but is there a way to make google think your site is about keywords xyz or is the only thing you can do write broadly on a topic and hope G picks up what you hope to rank for?
Anyway, thanks for your insight. Considering penguin 2.1, I think you're on a good way with the strict requirements on link building software usage. The general consensus seems to be low # of quality links > high # of average links (well, hasn't it always been like that?).
iggypop
Junior Member
- Feb 25, 2009
- 195
- 71
Hey I'm having a new problem. Don't know if it's related to an update or a new domain, but I've never encountered this before. "0 targets added" on every search. It basically hits all my keywords within 2 hours and can't find any links to post to. Know what this might be?
- Sep 17, 2008
- 6,037
- 3,974
PR is taken from the live site rather than the cache. You guys are correct that PR is checked in a way so as not to over use it where possible. The checks are done in order of least computationally expensive and then "proxy expensive" so first check is URL bad word (bad domain), then page is loaded and bad words list is checked, then OBL and then checked for usable platform and then if that is found and a usable form is found the PR is checked before posting starts. This is to prevent CPU over usage and burning out the proxies.
The last update had some updates to the way searching was done, I haven't had chance to see if it has any bearing on proxies getting/not getting burnt out but it could do.
The last update had some updates to the way searching was done, I haven't had chance to see if it has any bearing on proxies getting/not getting burnt out but it could do.
thebossispro
Regular Member
- Jan 12, 2013
- 300
- 63
Any plans on adding DA checker?
How do I know if my IP is blocked for google searching?
I was running NHS with 15 threads and 2 searching threads (not using any proxies, just my residential IP). After a while I only got back 0 new targets for any keyword/any site. I went to google and just searched for something random but didn't get a "too many automatic queries from your IP" message, so what could be causing the 0 new targets across the board? different sites, different keywords and really broad ones.
I was running NHS with 15 threads and 2 searching threads (not using any proxies, just my residential IP). After a while I only got back 0 new targets for any keyword/any site. I went to google and just searched for something random but didn't get a "too many automatic queries from your IP" message, so what could be causing the 0 new targets across the board? different sites, different keywords and really broad ones.
- Sep 17, 2008
- 6,037
- 3,974
I'm not sure, I will have to look into it.
It could just be that the keywords you are searching don't have any results or that there are no new results. NHSEO will always filter out any pages that are already in the DB, waiting to be posted or already posted, and also if you have it set to only post to unique domains once then it will also automatically filter out any targets on a domain that is already in the DB whether awaiting posting or already posted.
However if you are not using proxies you should consider switching to a single search thread to prevent your IP getting burnt out.
I don't see why not if it is practical to do so, i.e. that it doesn't require too many captchas or something similarly restrictive.
thebossispro
Regular Member
- Jan 12, 2013
- 300
- 63
Do you know how long it will be before DA or PA will be added?
- Sep 17, 2008
- 6,037
- 3,974
I haven't looked into it and may not get chance for a little while to be honest. Things are really uncharacteristically hectic round here at the minute and I am not sure how easy/possible it would be to check DA/PA on a large scale. Hopefully I will get chance in the next couple days but I cannot guarantee it.
- Status