Let me clarify recent complaint
The domain mentioned in this thread is one of our many fallback URLs.
If you prefer not to get traffic from these fallback domains, the easiest way is to select desktop traffic in the campaign filters because almost no desktop visitors goes to these fallbacks.
Another way is to analyze your traffic data and manually choose what GEOs, browsers and other filters work for you.
Some advertisers however prefer these fallback sources because they want to get as much traffic as they can for the minimum bid and it works for them.
Another thing we want to clarify is our policy about iframe/webview/mobile apps traffic.
We allow iframe/webview/mobile apps traffic as long as it is from real visitors (valid IP, no Proxy/TOR/VPN, etc.) and it have reasonable viewable size, not something like 1x1px.
To avoid future misunderstandings, we sent this info to the moderator to update our first post.
Su sum up:
- If you want as much traffic as you can get for the minimum bid - launch campaigns without any filters
- If you want lower amount of traffic, but with higher quality for the minimum bid - select desktop sources
- If you want highest quality traffic, expect to bid higher than minimum bid (At least $0.20 CPM) and properly analyze, what works best for you (which GEOs, browsers, etc.).
Its been over a year since we launched our platform to the public and we have many happy advertisers.
Some of them buy as much as 10M daily visitors and use our traffic successfully for arbitrage, website flipping, winning various online competitions, etc.
For the price we are offering and the volume we have, we really don't have many competitors because all bigger adnetworks have much higher minimum bids ($0.20-$1.00 depending on the adnetwork) and all those "buy targeted website visitors" websites have lower traffic quality than us.