I received two links as a review copy.
Content:
Different articles used on each site. They were surprisingly good. Different images used in each article. The images were not found on my target website, which is a good thing. Not all PBNs do that.
Each article were different takes on the same subject. A lot of times I get PBN links and the content is all alike. If keyword is car, I would get an entire set of articles about buying a car.
I appreciated the difference.
The only negative here is both sites had simular topics for the other articles, even articles without links.
Site Structure
Different themes used on the two sites. They had different default pages added. That was a nice touch.
The two sites did not have logos.
The posts were definately stickied.
Navigation was fine on mobile and desktop version of the site.
Network Strength
@Ryabinchik did a good job here. Metrics all alligned. The domains had the great links as advertised.
I was also concerned about the strength of the network long term. The seller has at least three open services. This is the only sticky post service I noticed of the seller.
I checked for network overlap. As in, if any non sticky posts had links.
No, they did not. This network appears to be completely independant from the sellers other networks.
That is huge for network security and means I would feel safe using all the networks
@Ryabinchik sells.
My SERPs? The dance started right away. Initial sudden spike for most targeted terms on the page. Those that spiked have danced since. That is a great sign for a powerful network.
What Could Improve
For a general niche PBN, I expect random content. I would have liked the two sites I received links on having completely content types and nothing in common. But they did.
That doesnt matter much.
I also like logos on my PBN sites. But that is me nitpicking the network.
Aside for my nitpicking and common site content (which is very common with public blog networks) I am very happy with this service.