Surmlej
Newbie
- Sep 30, 2018
- 25
- 5
Hi all,
I am quite new in the forum and I hope I am posting in the right place. I have been researching for a while and I want to build a PBN/MBN but I am following different examples of PBN/MBN, so it happens that these have changed in the past 2 years.
From huge domain groups topping all keywords from the easiest to the hardest in a 200+ websites PBN, now I can see how they're cancelling all blogs linked to the moneysite and creating 301 redirections.
I understand that this strategy reduces costs in domain maintenance per year, but despite of that I consider they could make a bigger profit keeping all the domains because in the cases of the MBNs (Money-blog-network) they did monetise all the entire network with adsense, affiliate, and more...
Now my question. Which option is more profitable? Keeping 200 domains and updating them, or redirecting them to the moneysite?
For some of you the answer may be obvious, a 200 sites PBN requires a lot more time to maintain. But I am thinking that this may not be the answer as this was not made from an individual but from a company with hundred of people working and dividing responsabilities.
And also checking the statistics (I can't confirm) but they boasted they were the best with this PBN and how personalised it was. Are they now loosing rank on purpose? Or when you're ranked you can just forget about the webs and apply the SEOonpage to keep floating the moneysite forever?
I really appreciate help from you SEO-experts.
Kind regards,
Surmlej.
I am quite new in the forum and I hope I am posting in the right place. I have been researching for a while and I want to build a PBN/MBN but I am following different examples of PBN/MBN, so it happens that these have changed in the past 2 years.
From huge domain groups topping all keywords from the easiest to the hardest in a 200+ websites PBN, now I can see how they're cancelling all blogs linked to the moneysite and creating 301 redirections.
I understand that this strategy reduces costs in domain maintenance per year, but despite of that I consider they could make a bigger profit keeping all the domains because in the cases of the MBNs (Money-blog-network) they did monetise all the entire network with adsense, affiliate, and more...
Now my question. Which option is more profitable? Keeping 200 domains and updating them, or redirecting them to the moneysite?
For some of you the answer may be obvious, a 200 sites PBN requires a lot more time to maintain. But I am thinking that this may not be the answer as this was not made from an individual but from a company with hundred of people working and dividing responsabilities.
And also checking the statistics (I can't confirm) but they boasted they were the best with this PBN and how personalised it was. Are they now loosing rank on purpose? Or when you're ranked you can just forget about the webs and apply the SEOonpage to keep floating the moneysite forever?
I really appreciate help from you SEO-experts.
Kind regards,
Surmlej.