PBN vs Web 2.0 Network
- Thread starter arre23
- Start date
antihero11
Regular Member
- Mar 25, 2014
- 421
- 133
Web 2.0 its free and everybody can get it and the other one is expensive and hard to get good one.
What do you think?
What do you think?
PBNs. However, who goes for Web 2.0. Is someone who can't afford PBNs or someone is already using PBNs but want to diverse his anchor texts.
If you will go with Web 2.0s, I recommend start with Expired ones. the original new ones are so weak.
You can also use new Web 2.0s but point some PBNs to them so they will start passing some juice through Tier 1.
If you will go with Web 2.0s, I recommend start with Expired ones. the original new ones are so weak.
You can also use new Web 2.0s but point some PBNs to them so they will start passing some juice through Tier 1.
Correct, but if you have decent PBN it's worth the cost as you control these sites, unlike the free platforms.
antihero11
Regular Member
- Mar 25, 2014
- 421
- 133
Totally agree. Also they can delete your blog and lost all content and backlinks
- May 11, 2014
- 2,146
- 2,062
It depends if by PBN you say "PUBLIC Blog Network" or "PRIVATE Blog Network"
Owanceaser
Elite Member
- Nov 15, 2014
- 2,393
- 462
PBN is more powerful compared to web 2.0.
damusic2010
Regular Member
- Jul 10, 2016
- 398
- 69
Yup. Had this happen with me using wordpress.
I think some of the web 2's are getting wise to using their platform for promotional use.
CarloPRuff
Newbie
- Aug 19, 2016
- 16
- 2
I personally use web blogs more.
- May 10, 2012
- 9,539
- 7,559
This can't even be compared in any way. Powerful PBN built on strong auction domains is X times more powerful than a few web 2.0 links, regardless on how good your web 2.0 properties are. PBN and web 2.0 shouldn't even be considered to be in same category in any way.
Javicuse
Junior Member
- Jan 26, 2018
- 139
- 123
For low- or medium-comp keywords, web2.0s can do the job. Expired work better, of course, but if you have a bit of patience, you can make some great new web 2.0s which can work great, as you build them with one goal in mind. But they take time to build, pump, and then transfer the juice. Personally, I mix them.
They cost me nothing but some half-automated time.
That being said, good PBNs are way more powerful than web 2.0s. But for a newbie, it's OK to start with web2.0s and learn along the way. That should get you some experience, which will later come in handy when building PBNs or buying PBN links.
I've had some pages ranking nicely with 30+ links/posts on expired web2.0s. However, just 5 PBN links to a similar page (kw difficulty, Number of searches, etc) did better and was more resilient to drop in SERP later on - easier to maintain ranking.
They cost me nothing but some half-automated time.
That being said, good PBNs are way more powerful than web 2.0s. But for a newbie, it's OK to start with web2.0s and learn along the way. That should get you some experience, which will later come in handy when building PBNs or buying PBN links.
I've had some pages ranking nicely with 30+ links/posts on expired web2.0s. However, just 5 PBN links to a similar page (kw difficulty, Number of searches, etc) did better and was more resilient to drop in SERP later on - easier to maintain ranking.
Scritty
Elite Member
- May 1, 2010
- 3,019
- 4,707
Best answer is - use both - and get links from other places as well. When the media waffle on about diversity these days, take that on board. Link diversity counts for a lot. A PBN, and WEB2.0 and forum and blog and.. all in moderation, all to the right recipe. Good luck OP 
Sudarshan Kar
Power Member
- Apr 27, 2017
- 674
- 350
PBNs obviously. Web 2.0s are free and best at diversifying anchors or moving extremely low competition keywords. Use a mix of both for best results.
