Parasite SEO Experiment finished by Google (right?)

Already f*cked up all my reputation with this, so i dont really mind no more

i did these two parasite seo experiments in public and some of my folks said they gained some insights through this, so i thought imma share it with you guys too.

My goal was simply to show, that Google is lying when it says "focus on good content" and names the update "helpful content update".

I wanted to show publicy, that you can rank with low-quality AI content and even NO content at all, IF your autority is high enough,

And it was a success - until Google stopped me.


First i set up a Wikipedia aticle "Parasitäre SEO" (parasistic seo).

It ranked #1 after 3 minutes. Content of page was deleted afer 4 minutes.

It still ranks #1:



Even had a featured snippet.

But a the keyword doesnt have many exact matches, nor any search volume, this wasnt saying too much.

Even tho the Wikipedia page keeps ranking #1 with no content at all for about 6 weeks now.


So i started experiment #2: Keyword "KI SEO" (AI SEO)

Created the wikipedia article with amazingly high quality content:



Content was deleted after 2 minutes, page ranked #44 for "KI SEO" (AI SEO) and #13 for "was ist ki seo" (what is ai seo) after 4 minutes.

Kept ranking there without any movement until i did some basic parasite backlinks. nothing special. yt, quora, stuf like that. just about 15 links max.


2 days ago (18-05) it ranked #13 for "KI SEO" (AI SEO) and #1 for "was ist ki seo" (what is ai seo) with featured snippet:



Just 1 day later (yesteday), the page disappeared from the serps:



I was VERY loud doing these experiments. And i was not hiding at all - even discussed with the wikipedia moderators about what im doing.

So my first thought was, wikipedia changed something to get empty pages out of the serps, but no:



The parasite SEO site i created 3-4 weeks before, still shows up.

AND

the "KI SEO" (AI SEO) site still dominates Bing, Yahoo and DuckDuckGo:




So what happened?

Google just telling me "stop playing around, kid"?

Just like they always do when any1 of us does anything they dont like just a little bit too loud, huh?

Oh, btw. my visibility on almost every platform i shared anything about my experiments dropped hard just yesterday.

Partially even looks like some shadow banning...

Im sure, this manual action was intended by google.

i cant imagine any of the competing sites reported this, since the term only has about 100 mthl searches.

What do you guys think?



If I'd be Google, I'd be ASHAMED as hell, that after all this time, i still have to delete sites from the serps manually.

But I understand why you had to delete this site.

Because honestly, Google: You and I know...

If you didnt delete it, in a few more days, i would be ranking it #1

And you just couldnt stand that shame, right?



Im on fire now.

My goal: Slap Googles face in public for ending my experiment without my permission.

experiment 3 is on the run.

more smooth. less loud. less public.

and when i got it, i jump outta nowhere, to give you the b*tchslap, you have earned yourself.

I will make you so ashamed, you have no idea yet.

i hope my sense of humer is working here somehow and this part is not interpreted in any weird kind of way



this is my (serious) resume:



Disclaimer:
You can judge what i do, but my intentions are good.
My intention is to show Googles weakness and somehow participate in creating better search results (for real) for US. The users.

thanks for your attention.
i hope, you can benefit from this in any way.

Any opinions of you guys are highly appreciated.

Kind regards,
Chris

Love to see Google weaknesses

The thing is, even if they say they're going after parasites, it's not the case,
If you take a couple of minutes checking the top parasites webites traffic in semrush you'll find traffic actually increasing,

here's some examples:
Medium:


LinkedIn:


And many others...
It's the same stuff with PBNs & Guest posts, just random states/attempts coming from Google