maineyak
Power Member
- Mar 27, 2008
- 602
- 560
The WWW is a HUGE place, and realistically, methods you find on BHW could be used over and over by multiple people, WITHOUT over-saturation. What kills the methods in most cases, is stupidity of people. How successful do you think a method can be, if 1000 people here on BHW implement it, without changing one wording or a method you find. I mean, find a method, and use it word for word, without putting in ONE twist to the method. Just this week I stumbled upon a method involving a WSO, and a few training videos. I could see by the views on the youtube video outlining the method, it had not been over-saturated, it had about 500 views. I went step through step, and found multiple people using the method AD VERBATIM on a site, without any success. How the hell do you think you will be successful if you are on a site, posting WORD FOR WORD, what a half dozen other people are flogging?
I put a FEW twists on the method, used the method on OTHER sites rather than the site suggested in the videos, and am already in the process of closing a few deals that will net me over $16k. (Don't ask for proof or screenshots, the older I get, the less I feel the need to prove myself).
One thing I am into is autoblogging. It's pathetic to see one of my blogs get 20 posts in a day from someone using Scrapebox who doesn't even have brains enough to check if their link is correct, or try spinning their comments so they're readable. They sometimes look like they were written by a retarded one armed chimp. Do you REALLY think those comments will be approved? Do you REALLY think you WON'T eventually be labeled as a spammer, and blacklisted? C'mon people!
I have been IMing probably longer then some of you have been alive. I have had MANY failures, and some successes. The failures came from STUPIDITY, and the successes came from imagination. The IM business truly CAN be a get rich scheme, but it won't be using methods right out of the box. I don't suggest thinking OUTSIDE the box, I suggest building a NEW box, climbing inside, and keeping it a secret to yourself. In the next week or 2 I hope to be joining the Jr. VIP section where I can share ideas, and ROUGHLY share methods with people who are SERIOUS about IM, and not just some fly by IMers looking to make a quick fortune from someone else's method, without putting their OWN thoughts into it.
I guess I just needed to rant, here's to all of you and your successes AND your failures (hopefully those are far and few between).
I put a FEW twists on the method, used the method on OTHER sites rather than the site suggested in the videos, and am already in the process of closing a few deals that will net me over $16k. (Don't ask for proof or screenshots, the older I get, the less I feel the need to prove myself).
One thing I am into is autoblogging. It's pathetic to see one of my blogs get 20 posts in a day from someone using Scrapebox who doesn't even have brains enough to check if their link is correct, or try spinning their comments so they're readable. They sometimes look like they were written by a retarded one armed chimp. Do you REALLY think those comments will be approved? Do you REALLY think you WON'T eventually be labeled as a spammer, and blacklisted? C'mon people!
I have been IMing probably longer then some of you have been alive. I have had MANY failures, and some successes. The failures came from STUPIDITY, and the successes came from imagination. The IM business truly CAN be a get rich scheme, but it won't be using methods right out of the box. I don't suggest thinking OUTSIDE the box, I suggest building a NEW box, climbing inside, and keeping it a secret to yourself. In the next week or 2 I hope to be joining the Jr. VIP section where I can share ideas, and ROUGHLY share methods with people who are SERIOUS about IM, and not just some fly by IMers looking to make a quick fortune from someone else's method, without putting their OWN thoughts into it.
I guess I just needed to rant, here's to all of you and your successes AND your failures (hopefully those are far and few between).
Last edited: