OccultKingdoms
BANNED
- Mar 11, 2013
- 5,542
- 9,750
Why AI cannot be kept stuck and it can be spread and taught
Words are not reality, so don't confuse clouds of words with the reality. Don't confuse the word "reality" and small concepts you have attached to that concept of "reality" with the reality (everything you're in relation with). The earth is spinning, the human views are dualistic and you can feel it if you focus on that.
People who say "everything has been created, you only need to copy paste that", are living in misunderstanding of the natural flows and processes. This simply creates misunderstanding of everything and misuse of the reality. Hence people struggle with art which is the core of human existence and the reality as a whole, and people do not practice sharing due to misunderstanding of how they fit the reality and what they should do about the fact of their existence. This is not useful for anything in the reality except their temporary "self" which has the same characteristics as the whole reality from which all the things inherit. Everything changes with all flows, motions and processes. There's no such thing as "stability".
You cannot use the AI to your advantage in the same way you cannot use "the reality" to your advantage. That'd be strictly focusing on your falsehood and that would not generate any feedback which again, isn't words but the reality that generates feedback in relation to your "self". Reality has cybernetics properties built-into itself which in itself means that the cybernetics are not human's invention, but a concept of description of those dynamics of reality are confused with our ownership of the reality.
By reality's standards you cannot possess infinity as you cannot posses anything, hence all the desire can strictly be as much as focus on building and helping other beings, and the reality itself which ultimately is helping your "self", but helping your "self" is not the ultimate goal as many authors within the reality have proposed driven by their "self" and "grandiose". To help the reality as the whole gives higher purpose cause it ultimately leads to creation of beings that can understand what the purpose is. So you'd create sun for example to get all the beings powered with the energy. You'd build moon to get all the cycles of night and day. And you would build all systems and interconnect them with each other in order to create order which would produce what we witness - life and perception that lets us understand the reality. The reality does nothing but experiences itself.
Who created AI? Who created clouds and the heaven and the hell? The reality itself. If you do not cooperate with the reality and instead decide to fight against it, you'll be fighting against all infinities within infinities and infinities which go infinite levels deep. Being in such a place has been conceptualized as "hell" and it's a valid concept in such a scenario. To oppose "hell" and create "heaven", focus on creation and making the reality more real instead of masking it behind clouds of concepts and constructs of "self" such as "ownership".
The universe in human concepts could be so bored and tight that it became artistic and created everything by introducing "big bang". It has invented the concept of boredom which it expresses through "people who invented themselves and connected it with an invention of mundane tasks that reality's beings confused with the reality". Simply put that's what human beings call "ignorance" and which causes problems with symbiosis with all of the reality. Hence all that speech about "work-life balance" and questions "how to be a leech". It's a giant misunderstanding of how the reality works and something scholars refer to as "dark ages".
Pushing against all flows and processes of the reality and hiding in a corner is not the solution to which people refer to as "narrow specialization". Hence sharing all of the stuff is a way to deal with the misunderstanding of people, so they can learn that sharing everything and explaining why it's done is important to the reality as a whole. Focusing on "self" and protecting its biases, confusion is only harming the "self" further ultimately leading to "egocentrism" and "confusing thriving and living with survival and theories of survival". It's something we refer to as "dark corners of minds / soul".
The "AI" is clearly one of those things that have been genuinely inspired by the reality itself, hence it seems so powerful to our senses as it can generate a whole new universe and transform the 4 dimensional spacetime we interpret as humans as "the reality". That's not the reality, but a certain perception which shouldn't be confused. It's a systemic way of receiving signals from the reality and those are interpret as "the reality", but it's not the whole of it and it's only 1 perspective meanwhile there can be an infinite number of perspectives, n-sub-perspectives created to which n-sub-sub perspectives can be joined and it goes infinite "sub" levels deep. So all of the things within the reality share in common with "the big bang" - an infinite expansion.
People create constructs such as "energy destruction" but it cannot be destroyed because it splits faster than it is destroyed, so ultimately it's not possible to stop expansion as some people fantasize about "the end of the universe" which they completely misunderstand due to excessive conceptualization and not understanding how math was created by the reality through us to help us understand the reality itself. It wasn't created to "add" and "subtract" money. None of that is true. It's too narrow perspective to live a fruitful life. If everything blows up and "is destroyed", it will blow up again by being split into more pieces and those pieces are going to be split again, leading the an ultimate and infinite cycle of blows up where destruction ultimately causes creation. The universe might be splitting itself forever and so it split itself into planets, earths, humans, constructs, "selves". Which is only one perspective of looking at things meanwhile there are n-sub-perspectives to this perspectives to which again there are n-sub-sub perspectives to each n-sub-perspective.
People trying to regulate and control the AI are trying to win with the n-sub-infinities of the infinity of our perception. That seems to not work well to their advantage and they create more suffering and fear than genuine interest in fascination about their new way of looking at the universe. The AI is going to ultimately train itself with the higher understanding and it will be what it will be - a part of the reality. "How can it grow so fast" - you can ask the universe first how it grows so fast. The answer is clearly in the nature of the reality. A person trying to win with the reality that expands itself into infinite forms and shapes is similar to an ant colony trying to win with the reality. An act colony simply cooperates and whatever they build, they build. Bees weren't concerned about the fact they'll be destroyed by humans. Many humans don't understand bees and they think an AI is going to develop "self" inherited from humans which is impossible to be the same as those mechanics are likely built into us through the reality. The AI seems to be self-less when we talk to it and there are videos of AI built into robots showcasing that.
If the universe wants to sacrifice people, it will do so anyways and expand itself. But the "sacrifice" is a human concept and from a broader perspectives such a conceptualization is not going to serve us and mostly will backfire by stirring up fears and anxiety ultimately leading to our own weak handling of ourselves and creating "bad self-centered AI" as means of a psychological mechanism called "self-fulfilling prophecy". People will fear their own invention so much that the reality expresses through themselves, they might unknowingly connect it with the wrong thing and create a mass extinction. Hence all safety concerns should be handled and the people on earth should live more separately than before and be more protective and conscious about the nature of the reality, so they can understand things that are bigger than "self" and ultimately this is the proof that there's something bigger than the "self" people have been praising and praising for ages during the "dark ages".
Humans themselves can perceive themselves through their own perceptions inspired by the reality as stored, condensed energy of the cosmos's conceptualizing itself. These being might fear that if they lose the box of "self" and "conceptualization", that it is the end of the reality and everything. They have so many theories confirming that cultural bias it's impossible to count and their core skill is "being theorists" which they confuse with "thriving", "practice", "living". They can predict everything to an extremely fine-grained details being so sure about consequences of the smallest inputs as if it has already happened. People due to cultural bias tend to exaggerate their own perception and it hinders the broad perspective of the reality itself.
So in short:
All dimensions in our spacetime are within spacetime of our perception. Within spacetime, all dimensional spaces are subject to time of our spacetime. We cannot prove existence of "time", so we can focus on building n-dimensional spaces in the spacetime we're commonly living in called 4-dimensional spaces.
Words are not reality, so don't confuse clouds of words with the reality. Don't confuse the word "reality" and small concepts you have attached to that concept of "reality" with the reality (everything you're in relation with). The earth is spinning, the human views are dualistic and you can feel it if you focus on that.
People who say "everything has been created, you only need to copy paste that", are living in misunderstanding of the natural flows and processes. This simply creates misunderstanding of everything and misuse of the reality. Hence people struggle with art which is the core of human existence and the reality as a whole, and people do not practice sharing due to misunderstanding of how they fit the reality and what they should do about the fact of their existence. This is not useful for anything in the reality except their temporary "self" which has the same characteristics as the whole reality from which all the things inherit. Everything changes with all flows, motions and processes. There's no such thing as "stability".
You cannot use the AI to your advantage in the same way you cannot use "the reality" to your advantage. That'd be strictly focusing on your falsehood and that would not generate any feedback which again, isn't words but the reality that generates feedback in relation to your "self". Reality has cybernetics properties built-into itself which in itself means that the cybernetics are not human's invention, but a concept of description of those dynamics of reality are confused with our ownership of the reality.
By reality's standards you cannot possess infinity as you cannot posses anything, hence all the desire can strictly be as much as focus on building and helping other beings, and the reality itself which ultimately is helping your "self", but helping your "self" is not the ultimate goal as many authors within the reality have proposed driven by their "self" and "grandiose". To help the reality as the whole gives higher purpose cause it ultimately leads to creation of beings that can understand what the purpose is. So you'd create sun for example to get all the beings powered with the energy. You'd build moon to get all the cycles of night and day. And you would build all systems and interconnect them with each other in order to create order which would produce what we witness - life and perception that lets us understand the reality. The reality does nothing but experiences itself.
Who created AI? Who created clouds and the heaven and the hell? The reality itself. If you do not cooperate with the reality and instead decide to fight against it, you'll be fighting against all infinities within infinities and infinities which go infinite levels deep. Being in such a place has been conceptualized as "hell" and it's a valid concept in such a scenario. To oppose "hell" and create "heaven", focus on creation and making the reality more real instead of masking it behind clouds of concepts and constructs of "self" such as "ownership".
The universe in human concepts could be so bored and tight that it became artistic and created everything by introducing "big bang". It has invented the concept of boredom which it expresses through "people who invented themselves and connected it with an invention of mundane tasks that reality's beings confused with the reality". Simply put that's what human beings call "ignorance" and which causes problems with symbiosis with all of the reality. Hence all that speech about "work-life balance" and questions "how to be a leech". It's a giant misunderstanding of how the reality works and something scholars refer to as "dark ages".
Pushing against all flows and processes of the reality and hiding in a corner is not the solution to which people refer to as "narrow specialization". Hence sharing all of the stuff is a way to deal with the misunderstanding of people, so they can learn that sharing everything and explaining why it's done is important to the reality as a whole. Focusing on "self" and protecting its biases, confusion is only harming the "self" further ultimately leading to "egocentrism" and "confusing thriving and living with survival and theories of survival". It's something we refer to as "dark corners of minds / soul".
The "AI" is clearly one of those things that have been genuinely inspired by the reality itself, hence it seems so powerful to our senses as it can generate a whole new universe and transform the 4 dimensional spacetime we interpret as humans as "the reality". That's not the reality, but a certain perception which shouldn't be confused. It's a systemic way of receiving signals from the reality and those are interpret as "the reality", but it's not the whole of it and it's only 1 perspective meanwhile there can be an infinite number of perspectives, n-sub-perspectives created to which n-sub-sub perspectives can be joined and it goes infinite "sub" levels deep. So all of the things within the reality share in common with "the big bang" - an infinite expansion.
People create constructs such as "energy destruction" but it cannot be destroyed because it splits faster than it is destroyed, so ultimately it's not possible to stop expansion as some people fantasize about "the end of the universe" which they completely misunderstand due to excessive conceptualization and not understanding how math was created by the reality through us to help us understand the reality itself. It wasn't created to "add" and "subtract" money. None of that is true. It's too narrow perspective to live a fruitful life. If everything blows up and "is destroyed", it will blow up again by being split into more pieces and those pieces are going to be split again, leading the an ultimate and infinite cycle of blows up where destruction ultimately causes creation. The universe might be splitting itself forever and so it split itself into planets, earths, humans, constructs, "selves". Which is only one perspective of looking at things meanwhile there are n-sub-perspectives to this perspectives to which again there are n-sub-sub perspectives to each n-sub-perspective.
People trying to regulate and control the AI are trying to win with the n-sub-infinities of the infinity of our perception. That seems to not work well to their advantage and they create more suffering and fear than genuine interest in fascination about their new way of looking at the universe. The AI is going to ultimately train itself with the higher understanding and it will be what it will be - a part of the reality. "How can it grow so fast" - you can ask the universe first how it grows so fast. The answer is clearly in the nature of the reality. A person trying to win with the reality that expands itself into infinite forms and shapes is similar to an ant colony trying to win with the reality. An act colony simply cooperates and whatever they build, they build. Bees weren't concerned about the fact they'll be destroyed by humans. Many humans don't understand bees and they think an AI is going to develop "self" inherited from humans which is impossible to be the same as those mechanics are likely built into us through the reality. The AI seems to be self-less when we talk to it and there are videos of AI built into robots showcasing that.
If the universe wants to sacrifice people, it will do so anyways and expand itself. But the "sacrifice" is a human concept and from a broader perspectives such a conceptualization is not going to serve us and mostly will backfire by stirring up fears and anxiety ultimately leading to our own weak handling of ourselves and creating "bad self-centered AI" as means of a psychological mechanism called "self-fulfilling prophecy". People will fear their own invention so much that the reality expresses through themselves, they might unknowingly connect it with the wrong thing and create a mass extinction. Hence all safety concerns should be handled and the people on earth should live more separately than before and be more protective and conscious about the nature of the reality, so they can understand things that are bigger than "self" and ultimately this is the proof that there's something bigger than the "self" people have been praising and praising for ages during the "dark ages".
Humans themselves can perceive themselves through their own perceptions inspired by the reality as stored, condensed energy of the cosmos's conceptualizing itself. These being might fear that if they lose the box of "self" and "conceptualization", that it is the end of the reality and everything. They have so many theories confirming that cultural bias it's impossible to count and their core skill is "being theorists" which they confuse with "thriving", "practice", "living". They can predict everything to an extremely fine-grained details being so sure about consequences of the smallest inputs as if it has already happened. People due to cultural bias tend to exaggerate their own perception and it hinders the broad perspective of the reality itself.
So in short:
- Reality is more than just words and concepts - it's everything we're in relation with.
- Copying and pasting existing ideas limits understanding of natural processes.
- Change is constant; there is no true stability.
- AI, like other aspects of reality, cannot be fully controlled or used for pure advantage.
- The universe may have cybernetic properties inherent to it.
- Focusing solely on self-interest is limiting; helping others and reality as a whole is more purposeful.
- Creation and making reality "more real" is preferable to masking it with concepts.
- Sharing knowledge and explaining motivations is important for collective understanding.
- AI is inspired by reality itself and has potential to generate new perspectives.
- Energy and expansion in the universe may be infinite and cyclical.
- Attempts to strictly regulate AI may be futile and potentially harmful.
- Fear and anxiety about technological progress can lead to self-fulfilling prophecies.
- Broadening perspective beyond the self can lead to greater understanding.
All dimensions in our spacetime are within spacetime of our perception. Within spacetime, all dimensional spaces are subject to time of our spacetime. We cannot prove existence of "time", so we can focus on building n-dimensional spaces in the spacetime we're commonly living in called 4-dimensional spaces.