abhijit369
Regular Member
- Jan 17, 2010
- 406
- 107
Hello,
Can anybody give a good insight of new web2.0's vs old ones for seo?
thank you
Can anybody give a good insight of new web2.0's vs old ones for seo?
thank you
so you guys prefer old ones since they may have link profiles, what if they do not have any link profiles?
If they are just created with an article(no links) and left, will they be helpful and better than new ones?
I have some good number of web2.0 accounts with 1-2 articles in each and have 1 or 0 links. I am not sure what to do with them since I am out of niche web business as of now. They are 2-3 yrs old and I want to make use of them....they are sitting idle
There are various tools for finding expired web2.0's or you can buy them in the marketplace here. The main advantage isn't the links, its that the aged ones seem to ACTUALLY INDEX these days. Since Google is being an asshole about indexing web2.0s.
There are various tools for finding expired web2.0's or you can buy them in the marketplace here. The main advantage isn't the links, its that the aged ones seem to ACTUALLY INDEX these days. Since Google is being an asshole about indexing web2.0s.
The purpose is to get powerful links. Old sites with links are better than new sites with links. New sites with links are better than old sites with no links.
i couldn't agree more with this.As a popular expired Web 2.0 seller, I would recommend it. But to be very frank, it saves you time in building links as there are some links already pointing to those expired Web 2.0. And they are sold for peanuts. More importantly as explained by wblteam: