nofollow, cant benefit our SEO effort?

Using both adds variety and that makes you look more natural. 1000 PR 7-9 ********s or 1000 varied PR Nofollows. Which looks like an SEO program? =)
 
nofollow is telling google to not pass on page rank, so no, a no follow link is basically pointless. in my opinion anyways, i try not to get no follow, although, if you had 100% ******** links its going to look weird, because sites like digg have nofollow, but if you have a popular site it should have some links from digg, and other popular sites. So the answer is no, nofollow links do not help your ranking, but nofollow links make your site look a bit more natural to google.
 
Some no follow are really powerful like Digg and Reddit so that's provide you link volume, all are good for SERP's.
 
thanks guys for this topic, it helped a newbie like me :)
 
I think nofollow doesnot give link juice.. but it wirks as backlink to your site. One more benefit is if there is nofollow link to your site.. that is natural.
 
Well of course nofollow links are worth the effort. I mean, especially if the link is from a blog or site very specrfic to your niche or service...
I have a little UFO site (cuz I be a nerd... a hot nerd, but a really geeky one too. Don't hate.), and I spent a day (or at least a whole exhausting hour) going through a bunch of nofollow Star Trek and Star Wars blogs, making really innovative and interesting comments (cuz I be talented like that, y'know?) with links to my little UFO site.
Okay, so I only made six nofollow links, but it was exhausting trying to get through all the geekalicious language.

My point (and I promise I have one) is that I still get an average of about 50-100 unique visitors a week from those silly little nofollow links. Link building is always important. Also, it's exhausting and should be handed off to assistants from Bangladesh-i-stein or the Philopeeenz. Good luck!
 
Just get a good nofollow toolbar or plugin that will allow you to see which sites are do follow or otherwise, personally I use quirk. If you can get awesome dot.edu opportunities which are no follow....you're all set with high quality posts...
 
After Google Update. do follow also nothing proving best.

Do invest your time and money on unique articles and maintain a blog. ranking will come up
 
In my opinion, nofollow is more powerful and more natural.

Webmasters believe they need to get only do follow links to rank. That is wrong. I have several websites that are ranking in the top 3 just from Youtube videos description backlinks alone, and they are nofollow.

Matt is telling webmasters that nofollow has no value and passes no link juice. That is a load of crap. Nofollow backlinks does pass value and count. Whether it passes link juice or not, is to be determined. If it does, it is extremely minimal.

Matt has never been truthful about seo, he's always double talking. Tells webmasters one thing, to turn around and target those same type of strategies that are considered to be "acceptable".

I personally think Google wants you to chase after do follow links, so it is easier to spot who is trying to influence the rankings. That is why I have always gone after a 75% nofollow/do follow 25% rate. It appears more natural.

To answer your question, yes, nofollow is worth the effort.

Someday, Google will make an update and that will target those do follow backlinks.

Agreed 100%, damn you reveal the secret !
 
DoFollows are your bicycle. NoFollows are your helmet.

Without NoFollows, your chances of injury are greater.
Without DoFollows, you're never going to go anywhere.

Note that it has never actually been confirmed that google bans people based on their link ratio, it's just one of the things we suspect they might use as an indicator of cheating. For this reason most people suggest to have what we believe to be a "natural" ratio, 50-50.

One important thing to point out is that the majority of webmasters and site owners consider nofollow links to be safe for user submitted content, and assume that they do not help people's sites. It would be incredibly unfair by Google to deceive all these webmasters by not making a statement clearing up this issue if nofollows actually did help improve rankings.

Since google has made no such statement, it seems that the current understanding of nofollows is correct. They don't help your rankings.
 
In my opinion, nofollow is more powerful and more natural.

Webmasters believe they need to get only do follow links to rank. That is wrong. I have several websites that are ranking in the top 3 just from Youtube videos description backlinks alone, and they are nofollow.

Matt is telling webmasters that nofollow has no value and passes no link juice. That is a load of crap. Nofollow backlinks does pass value and count. Whether it passes link juice or not, is to be determined. If it does, it is extremely minimal.

Matt has never been truthful about seo, he's always double talking. Tells webmasters one thing, to turn around and target those same type of strategies that are considered to be "acceptable".

I personally think Google wants you to chase after do follow links, so it is easier to spot who is trying to influence the rankings. That is why I have always gone after a 75% nofollow/do follow 25% rate. It appears more natural.

To answer your question, yes, nofollow is worth the effort.

Someday, Google will make an update and that will target those do follow backlinks.

DoFollows are your bicycle. NoFollows are your helmet.

Without NoFollows, your chances of injury are greater.
Without DoFollows, you're never going to go anywhere.

Note that it has never actually been confirmed that google bans people based on their link ratio, it's just one of the things we suspect they might use as an indicator of cheating. For this reason most people suggest to have what we believe to be a "natural" ratio, 50-50.

One important thing to point out is that the majority of webmasters and site owners consider nofollow links to be safe for user submitted content, and assume that they do not help people's sites. It would be incredibly unfair by Google to deceive all these webmasters by not making a statement clearing up this issue if nofollows actually did help improve rankings.

Since google has made no such statement, it seems that the current understanding of nofollows is correct. They don't help your rankings.

ryannull and mikeads66 both explained the fact clearly about Nofollow.
 
Junpoy,

Yes no-follow links can help in your SEO effort. They will not count toward your Page Rank however they will help in a number of other ways. They can improve your backlink profile by offering diversification. If you have all do-follow links to your website, this doesn't look natural. They also help drive traffic to your website. Unless the only reason you are link building is to increase your Page Rank. People still click on the links, you are still able to offer valuable information to readers who may convert on your site later on, and you can still get exposure for your website.

This post offers a lot of good reasons why no-follow links are still beneficial,

http://www.highervisibility.com/blog/why-nofollow-links-can-still-add-benefit/

This post also talks about the pros and cons of no-follow links,

http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/2169-Ask-an-Expert-Do-No-Follow-Links-Help-with-SEO-

Hope this helps,

Shawn
 
I totally agree:

1) you still get the natural traffic through nofollow links
2) google still counts them as links
3) at some point google will update its ranking and count nofollows more and more
 
Back
Top