rafark
Elite Member
- Jan 15, 2013
- 3,249
- 1,979
They’re probably all spam/low quality. The same as the post that bumped this thread.
elvisvenezuela
Newbie
- Aug 25, 2020
- 22
- 0
I'd like to know that too!
TheAfrikan
Junior Member
- Nov 27, 2019
- 122
- 24
seoarg
Registered Member
- Jan 2, 2016
- 70
- 22
I think that tier2 or tier3 IMO.
jennyhannb
Newbie
- Jul 10, 2018
- 25
- 7
Thank you! I did, but much of this web 2.0 is easy to delete. Even if I don't insert the link.
Or is it because of my ip address! I changed the proxy address already!
Or is it because of my ip address! I changed the proxy address already!
sakib777
Registered Member
- Nov 27, 2012
- 67
- 34
Thanks a lot man. This list will be a great addition in my old list.
- Nov 23, 2020
- 5,930
- 1,706
The list it working and it's good enough.
But I can't not to mention: most of web 2.0 have really low indexing rate. As we all know - it's essential for every single link so far.
That's why I guess the true value of web 2.0 sites will be when they all are indexable.
P.S. The latest web 2.0 links research of mine showed that only 10 links of 100 got indexed within 2 months. It's very poor result.
What indexing rate is good for you? I guess if it's about 50% - good enough.
But I can't not to mention: most of web 2.0 have really low indexing rate. As we all know - it's essential for every single link so far.
That's why I guess the true value of web 2.0 sites will be when they all are indexable.
P.S. The latest web 2.0 links research of mine showed that only 10 links of 100 got indexed within 2 months. It's very poor result.
What indexing rate is good for you? I guess if it's about 50% - good enough.
LoverMarketing
Regular Member
- Nov 5, 2017
- 255
- 65
Can I use any of those sites if I index it for my article with extraordinary content and rank them in SEPS high? If anyone did that and ranking high, please let me know.
JamesMarchant
Registered Member
- May 6, 2022
- 50
- 10
Thanks for sharing. Are these websites genuine or not spammy?
