NEVER Pay For Gas or Electricity Again!

...Talking about free energy and cars running on anything else but oil/fuel, that certainly scares the mess out of a hell lot of CEOs and governments. Why? Just think of how many billions of $ they would be losing out of...
No, they won't lose anything. They'll just start taxing what is now considered 'free'. Just like heating / agricultural diesel is (almost) not taxed so will drinking water remain cheap and the rest will be slapped with 70% tax. It has happened with every new fuel in history. Just wait for the day when we have to pay based on wattage of our wind turbines or the number of sunny days the year had.

Some electricity corps are already building electrical stations to charge vehicles because they want to remain on top and keep their monopoly. And governments like monopolies because it keeps the prices high and a tax is usually a percentage. Also it is a lot easier to get the tax - instead of tracking 500 companies for possible evasion, they prefer to work with 5. It doesn't matter whether it's about oil, tidal forces, geysers and so on.

To illustrate this, the prices for electricity in the USA (fossils) and Iceland (geothermal) are almost the same. The meanest corps can be the governments themselves, check the prices in the so-called good countries to live like Sweden, Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_pricing#Price_comparison

This is the vicious circle that needs to be broken and not some absurd idea that claims to use the heat from a refrigerator to cook meals while the cooling of the stove through the steak can be used to freeze the meat in the fridge.
 
Wow, I had no idea there were so many nutjobs on BHW.
 
No, they won't lose anything. They'll just start taxing what is now considered 'free'. Just like heating / agricultural diesel is (almost) not taxed so will drinking water remain cheap and the rest will be slapped with 70% tax. It has happened with every new fuel in history. Just wait for the day when we have to pay based on wattage of our wind turbines or the number of sunny days the year had.

Some electricity corps are already building electrical stations to charge vehicles because they want to remain on top and keep their monopoly. And governments like monopolies because it keeps the prices high and a tax is usually a percentage. Also it is a lot easier to get the tax - instead of tracking 500 companies for possible evasion, they prefer to work with 5. It doesn't matter whether it's about oil, tidal forces, geysers and so on.

I have a farm property and a while back the government came up with the bright idea of taxing the number of dams owners had (supplying their own water). They were going to calculate rainfall x storage area to rate the tax. There was a commotion about such an inordinate tax and so far it hasn't gone through. Absolutely NOTHING the government will do surprises me.
 
No, they won't lose anything. They'll just start taxing what is now considered 'free'. Just like heating / agricultural diesel is (almost) not taxed so will drinking water remain cheap and the rest will be slapped with 70% tax. It has happened with every new fuel in history. Just wait for the day when we have to pay based on wattage of our wind turbines or the number of sunny days the year had.

Taxing green energy is a step in the right direction. A healthy environmental trend like Water4Gas, taxes and all, opens the doors for greater wind, solar and magnetic technologies on the whole.
 
I Read the Headline...And the First Comment Hit It Right On The Nose....!!
Good Job Facebookdude.....people still think the Gov has their best interest.:confused:



Wanna know why this technology isn't been further investigated? Because coal, petrol, oil etc is too profitable for the government to give up. Geothermal power is there and it can power our planet for another 3000 years.

The government is so corrupt that we don't even know the half of it. Open your eyes fellas.
 
Wanna know why this technology isn't been further investigated? Because coal, petrol, oil etc is too profitable for the government to give up. Geothermal power is there and it can power our planet for another 3000 years.

The government is so corrupt that we don't even know the half of it. Open your eyes fellas.

Erm. What happens in the 3001st year? Does the planet suddenly cool-down to room temperature?

But I agree. Geothermal is obviously the way to go. It's a matter of digging a deep hole and running water into it, and creating electricity from the steam that results. Almost a no-brainer.
 
No wonder the governments can control so many people. Amazing how naive we can be sometimes. Some believe that splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen and then joining them back into water will give a net energy gain. Such a claim invalidates a bunch of general physical principles and at least one thermodynamical. If an inventor manages to do that he'd be famous not because he found a new way of transportation but for redefining physics. That is yet to happen, I'm sorry.

All the energy we can extract comes either from the sun or from fusion and fission. Crude oil for example releases the sun energy that was captured by plants millions of years ago. It's that simple. When you light a candle made of paraffin you see ancient sun light in a sense.

Instead of falling for scam claims, check out the really useful research that is being done as we speak. One field is artificial photosynthesis. Plants use the sunlight to directly split the water into H2 and O2. If we can do that then the HHO engne becomes useful. As it is, we need to use more electricity to get the gas than can be retrieved when burning it.

MiLiTARYiV claims water4gas works but you can't use 1 Watt in a reaction and get 1.1 Watt from the opposite reaction. The energy conversion efficiency can never be above 1. Only some highly experimental transformers reach a 0.998 ratio, all other machines are lucky to get above .70

And oil is not expensive, it is cheaper than anything else at the moment. It's just heavily taxed so that some people can keep receiving their wellfare cheques. Yes you can drive your (diesel) car with cooking oil but a gallon of it costs more than gas. Same for geotermal energy and rest of the alternative methods. Not sure how many are paying attention but 30% of my energy bill goes to research of these alternative methods and quite frankly I am getting kind of tired of it. My neighbour is laughing at me because he got his subsidized solar panels from my electricity bill. I can do the same of course but unfortunately I am not the next parasitic asshole.

wrong. dont lie and say oil isnt subsidized. yur not counting the 300-500 billion dollars the US spends every year mostly on navy in the persia gulf to protect big oil. if you paid for that yur gas would be 6.50 a gallon. so by using foreign oil supported by US military dollars you are a parasitic asshole yur words not mine. but keep lying to yourself if it makes you feel better.

btw if you take time to solder your own solar panels you get electricity for about $1 per watt. it is also pretty easy to build your own wind turbine if you live where there is enough wind.
 
Amazing how naive we can be sometimes. Some believe that splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen and then joining them back into water will give a net energy gain.

If the molecules are split using virtually free electricity from geothermal, the energy gain of burning the hydrogen should also be virtually free, less the "administrative costs" of packaging, transport, etc....

geothermal + hydrogen is one technological advance away from becoming the new standard, and with it pollution will also dramatically reduce.
 
If the molecules are split using virtually free electricity from geothermal, the energy gain of burning the hydrogen should also be virtually free, less the "administrative costs" of packaging, transport, etc....

geothermal + hydrogen is one technological advance away from becoming the new standard, and with it pollution will also dramatically reduce.
Yes, that is why I mentioned artificial photosynthesis. Plants split the water getting the energy for that from the sun and then create sugars with some losses. If (when) we can do the same, the yield will be higher because we just need the first step and no carbs. It'll be possible to recharge the tank using the water produced as waste during burning and a little bit of sunlight.

As to the 'virtually free', oil is also virtually free, just drill a hole and then package it but we are forced to pay a lot more for it. At any rate it is a limited resource and we are going to have to move to cleaner fuel someday.

Personally I believe it will be either water splitting (some form of it) or hydrogen fusion that is going to power the homes and cars of our grandchildren.
 
"The military and the super rich already have
'free energy' and put great effort into
keeping if from civilians which is easy when
most civilians are unknowingly helping us by
attacking and ridiculing all who even mention it."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8u9VNzcL4HA&feature=related


"Free energy is everywhere and its cheap. Oil
is expensive especially environmentally and
its running out. Let the government and
corps tax free energy. How long will it take
millions to figure out how to get Off The Grid??"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOgfDVBeDgE
 
ENJOY GUYS.....

this documentary was recommended to me from another forum!

It looks great!


Machine to Die For is about the search for perpetual motion and free energy.
Conventional science claims this is impossible, yet generations of inventors have been mesmerized by the promise of an engine that powers itself.
The world's reliance on diminishing fossil fuel resources and the associated problems of pollution serve to spur them on.

A Machine to Die For showcases a number of dedicated, sometimes eccentric, and always obsessive individuals who have devoted their lives to this quest.
The documentary could be used as a resource when studying motion and simple machines in secondary science and physics.
It could also serve as a springboard for discussions about inventors and inventions and the history of scientific endeavors. It would be suitable for teachers of middle to senior secondary students in Science.

Code:
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/machine-die-quest-free-energy/
 
Last edited:
ENJOY GUYS.....

this documentary was recommended to me from another forum!

It looks great!




Code:
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/machine-die-quest-free-energy/

Amazing video. Very entertaining. :p That was one way out bunch of
characters of & course the producer, who seemed to be in league with the
skeptic, purposely made these guys seem freakier than they are which is
not necessary.
Make sense they'd be different to come up with such way out
inventions. Tesla was extremely eccentric too.
While the skeptic is just a wannabe James Randi it was
somewhat of a victory to see an IBM scientist validate John Searles'
perpetual motion flying machine and another scientist validate the
nordic guy's perpetual machine.

There's an amazing John Searles video at the beginning of this thread.
However, if they really wanted to show perpetual motion in a favorable
light they'd have John Searles demonstrate his engines and flying devices
instead of just showing his computer. Good find IamNRE.
 
Back
Top