Negative SEO with scrapebox?

Google is laughing to death with this hahahaha. Just let the SEOs fight amongst themselves.

DanDanger was spot on..

business is business.. if their website is aged its going to make it harder to effect them.. it can in turn help them actually.. so if you're going to do it go all out

There's no question whether or not negative seo works. It does. I've had it happen to more than one of my sites and what they did is over optimize the anchors with blog comments, forum profiles and all the shit links they could find. Obviously negative seo will not work on whitelisted websites, or will take a lot of effort on strong sites, but these are the times we now live in. What good is it to invest time into a site that ranks well only to have some dickwad nuke it with spam links so that their site can rank higher? Google does not give a shit either. All Google cares about is converting more website owners into Adwords users. And with every website penalized for link spam, Google will have the red carpet rolled out to justify showing only paid ads on the first page of the serps somewhere in the not so distant future.

Homey of course negative seo exists! Thats why there are now link removal services! If negative seo didnt exist they wouldnt exist either.

The problem is that its so easy to do as others have said. Heck I can buy a few fiverr gigs and fuck my competitors. I dont do that. I only fuck those scammers that scam me. Nothing better than having a client perform a chargeback or something after you perform the job. Thinking that they will get away with free SEO. Then you spam them into oblivion. Karmas a bitch.

Otherwise negative SEO isn't cool.

DanDanger said:

Tensegrity, sorry but it's time to wake up the smell the coffee.

Negative SEO is on the rise and already a widely used practice.

Even for a newbie without their own software it takes $50 on fiverr and 10 minutes to get a very successful negative seo completed.

Who's telling you negative SEO isn't worth it and not working? Matt Cutts? IMers stuck in the glory days?

Sadly it's a case of "get with the times".

Click to expand...

I got something you can smell :rapture:

Pffft I don't really care what Matt Cutts says, I just do what works per my testing, and I never said neg seo didn't work, I said it's bad karma. And it's nothing new, it's been around since search engines were created. The only thing that is on the rise is the number of people performing SEO. So, it's not "get with the times" it's "pick your battles". You wanna spend all your time taking someone down, go ahead.

Forget it if you want try on already aged and trusty domain. Negative seo works only on new competitor sites that google not knows if they are spammy or not. If you do negative seo on a domain that never spammed the results are 0

OP, I would neg rep you if I could.

Just remember negative SEO works....both ways! If you neg SEO a competitor...chances are you will start a spam war where you both lose!

I know who my main competitors are in my niche and they know who i am too. (social footprints) and so far no one has tried this crap but if they did then i would hit my competitors sites in retaliation!

Yes I have seen negative SEO backfire. Comes down to the level of authority a site has that is the target. Huge authority sites, will only go up.

Due to Google's crap algo, Negative SEO is a big hit & possible like a charm...

Don't do Neg Seo.. Concentrate on working good SEO of your own sites instead