Need person who can clean email list

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
281
Reaction score
80
Hello,

I have 400k email list and need to clean it. Who can clean it fast and not expensvie please pm me .

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Hello .

Will Be able to Do it very Quickly and at very Reasonable price for you !!! you can easily contact us via Skype !!
 
If you just need to remove dupes and check syntax, it shouldn't cost you a single penny. If you're trying to verify the [email protected] to see if it's a valid address that's a little different. It's also nearly impossible without actually sending an email to them first, so be careful if anyone can claim 100% accuracy, as there's no such thing for certain networks.
 
I will clean it in just 5 minutes for only $50.. PM me immediately!
 
Last edited:
If you need to clean syntax error emails, then i can do it.

If you need to actually send emails to clean them, then also i can do it.

Both prices differ by a hell lot of amount.
PM for more info.
 
the only way to verify emails is to send emails to your list especially on yahoo emails.
I can seperate bounces from your list.Contact me.
 
Seems much less risky to use Atomic email verifier rather than sending out your list to somebody on BHW no?
 
If you want to use a 3rd party service to scrub bounces, etc, you get what you pay for:

SiftLogic - Removes known screamers and other "bad" domains and addresses, scrubs hardbounces, and rates the addresses based on their likely engagement. Price is tolerable.

BrightVerify - Same as SiftLogic but doesn't rate engagement. These guys are used by some big names in the bulk email space, but their pricing is painful.

ImpressionWise - Now claims to provide engagement info, and they claim to be the best at identifying sp*mh*us traps and other honeypots based on a whole bunch of heuristics for network analysis. The can only do this for GI data, though. They are totally unable to it for normal mailbox providers (yahoo, gmail, hotmail, etc).

I've personally worked with two out of those three, but all three are fairly well known.
 
hmmm no response from OP in this thread
please let us know, whether it is solved or not
thanks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
This thread has been auto closed due to the forum's thread age policy. Read more.
Back
Top