NameCheap Just Redesigned their Homepage and WOW!
- Thread starter WinningIO
- Start date
- Apr 13, 2013
- 8,294
- 2,799
Doesn't really mean much. Different theme or a new theme it's still the same hosting and delivers the same performance.
negligence
Regular Member
- Jan 3, 2010
- 257
- 333
It looks "OK". However, it'd be better if we could "view cart" without it throwing errors.
Already submitted a ticket requesting them to fix it.
Already submitted a ticket requesting them to fix it.
mrtwister_65
Regular Member
- Dec 30, 2009
- 461
- 542
What's going on with all that design changes? First, Clickbank, now Namecheap... Half-assed blog lookalike approach to a business data-driven website is a crime IMHO.
divok
Senior Member
- Jul 21, 2010
- 1,071
- 656
now i have to click on forgot password . My login details don't show up anymore .Fuck !!!
WTF
https://manage.www.namecheap.com/myaccount/rememberpwd.asp
WTF
https://manage.www.namecheap.com/myaccount/rememberpwd.asp
FutureProofSeo
Senior Member
- Jul 3, 2013
- 956
- 484
It is the completely wrong design for the Users intentions.
More of a portfolio / software site than a domains.
Moral of the story: The cheaper your product the less time / page copy you need to sell it.
You don't need a full width, beautiful site like that to sell $5 domains!!
Focus should've been on speed, and clarity, of which the new theme has none.
PS:
Rant is partially due to, despite constantly ticking the "Auto renew" payment box, my hosting still doesn't auto renew, and is suspended until I manually pay (again).
More of a portfolio / software site than a domains.
Moral of the story: The cheaper your product the less time / page copy you need to sell it.
You don't need a full width, beautiful site like that to sell $5 domains!!
Focus should've been on speed, and clarity, of which the new theme has none.
PS:
Rant is partially due to, despite constantly ticking the "Auto renew" payment box, my hosting still doesn't auto renew, and is suspended until I manually pay (again).
Last edited:
HelloInsomnia
Elite Member
- Mar 1, 2009
- 1,801
- 3,042
The old one was way better, this looks terrible I hate it when sites use up so much screen real estate to show me a terrible picture that is way too busy. Taking up half my screen to show me an input textbox?!
This looks like it was built by a web designer who never in his life heard of "converting visitors" or split testing or anything that should be important to them.
This looks like it was built by a web designer who never in his life heard of "converting visitors" or split testing or anything that should be important to them.
Dirtyminded
Newbie
- Mar 1, 2009
- 36
- 9
old one was the best and people could easily understand it but now it will be complicated 
for new users
for new users
- Dec 30, 2007
- 3,115
- 1,764
I liked old one way much better. This one is way to much bootstrap-alike like all other websites on the web.
Previous design was really much better IMHO.
Previous design was really much better IMHO.
SquirlyNutz
Power Member
- Feb 20, 2009
- 721
- 541
Some people here have bad taste :biggrin1: Looks like a 10 yr old did the design. Looks awefull.
