uxtishka
Junior Member
- Jan 8, 2010
- 104
- 6
The first tier of 12 sites. The second tier 13 sites. I can not understand where refers remaining single (13th) Web 2.0 site. I drew this in my picture . Thank you for your patience
My New SEO Method for getting 1st page in search engine
- Status
The first tier of 12 sites. The second tier 13 sites. I can not understand where refers remaining single (13th) Web 2.0 site. I drew this in my picture . Thank you for your patience
.:mAestro:.
Senior Member
- Apr 17, 2010
- 983
- 390
One of the best threads in a while Thank you for all information and your answers!
Thank you for all information and your answers!For those who want a digramatic explanation:
Question: When you link from articles back to web 2.0's how do you create the link? i don't mean the html but more how doo you write a article/web 2.0 with a link to another article/web 2.0 so that it gets accepted? Do you write somehting like 'I recently read a really cool blog post on wigets' and then link the term 'widgets' or what ever the kw is back to the article/web 2.0? or do you just use the resource box ???
Can anyone show me a example of a web 2.0/article that links to another web 2.0/article?
Im interested to understand how you manage to work a link into the content?
jairathnem
Power Member
- Oct 27, 2010
- 549
- 317
I have a German language website and the keyword is also much competitive. What should i do. The Article should be written in English or in German language. and where these articles have to be submitted in German Resources or in English resources. The targeted search engine .de . Have any idea please?
JohnnySalami
Registered Member
- Jan 4, 2012
- 82
- 9
I'm perhaps stupid
12x web2.0
-----------
24 links-->M$
12x AD
------
12links-->MS
12links-->12x web2.0
13x web 2.0
-----------
13links-->12x web2.0
13links-->12x AD
13x AD
------
13links-->13x web2.0
13links-->M$
This should all be 100 links total. Does it make sense now?
uxtishka
Junior Member
- Jan 8, 2010
- 104
- 6
I don't understand it:
w2 #1 -->w1 #1
-->a1 #1
w2 #2 -->w1 #2
-->a1 #2
.......
w2 #12 -->w1 #12
-->a1 #12
w2 #13 --> ??? where exactly refers? M$?
--> ??? where exactly refers? M$?
JohnnySalami
Registered Member
- Jan 4, 2012
- 82
- 9
It's just an extra link bro. Link to one of the W2s and M$ links an extra time.
I don't think it is necessary. Mrbollywood is just working with round numbers. His previous method used 100 w2s, 100 ADs, etc.
This method uses 25 w2s, 25 ADs, etc. understand? If you don't like the 13th extra link, I'm sure it wouldn't hurt to drop the second round to 12 instead of 13.
I don't think it is necessary. Mrbollywood is just working with round numbers. His previous method used 100 w2s, 100 ADs, etc.
This method uses 25 w2s, 25 ADs, etc. understand? If you don't like the 13th extra link, I'm sure it wouldn't hurt to drop the second round to 12 instead of 13.
joaquin112
Regular Member
- Apr 4, 2010
- 287
- 224
Can]t you do this with senuke?
uxtishka
Junior Member
- Jan 8, 2010
- 104
- 6
You should but SEnuke does not give you the web 2.0 diversity. From my testing it usually registers and post to about 20-25 web 2.0's.
Also, SEnuke does not output article directory URL's because they're probably not auto approving - and they likely won't approve the links either. Which is why he recommends using AA article directories.
You can probably add them on to AMR.
D
Deleted member 17472
Guest
Post in German language
N1ckG2
Elite Member
- Dec 17, 2011
- 2,670
- 1,321
I think you bother too much with the structure of web 20 properties and links. There is not a recipe guys, the different you do it, the better results you see.
Its not good if all webmasters follow the same strategy, right?
The diversity is the key here, so make 10 different graphs and you are golden.
Its not good if all webmasters follow the same strategy, right?
The diversity is the key here, so make 10 different graphs and you are golden.
ranarockzz
Registered Member
- Feb 3, 2012
- 54
- 10
Great share thanks..
Stupid Questions Possibly but I am a bit confused ?
1st tier of 12 WEB 2.0's - 2 links to money site
------------------------------------------------
Do I have to link only to money site from each of the properties?
Don't I have to interlink these 2.0 12 properties with each other ? meaning 3 links in the article,
2 links to money site and 1 lik to other 2.0 property
2nd tier - Article Directories - 2 links, one to money site, another to a web 2.0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do I have to link only to money site and to a web 2.0 from each of the properties?
Don't I have to interlink these article diretory properties with each other ? meaning 3 links in the article,
1 links to money site, 1 link to other 2.0 property and the third link to other article in article directory.
Last question,
Can I replace the article directory tier with different set of web 2.0 properties?
1st tier - 12 web 2.0's
2nd tier - 12 new set web 2.0's (I will use dofferent web 2.0s)
3rd tier - 13 web 2.0's
4rd tier - 13 new set web 2.0's
Also what is the logic behind 12-12-13-13 combination? Can I just use 12-12-12-12 or 15-15-15-15?
Thx!
1st tier of 12 WEB 2.0's - 2 links to money site
------------------------------------------------
Do I have to link only to money site from each of the properties?
Don't I have to interlink these 2.0 12 properties with each other ? meaning 3 links in the article,
2 links to money site and 1 lik to other 2.0 property
2nd tier - Article Directories - 2 links, one to money site, another to a web 2.0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do I have to link only to money site and to a web 2.0 from each of the properties?
Don't I have to interlink these article diretory properties with each other ? meaning 3 links in the article,
1 links to money site, 1 link to other 2.0 property and the third link to other article in article directory.
Last question,
Can I replace the article directory tier with different set of web 2.0 properties?
1st tier - 12 web 2.0's
2nd tier - 12 new set web 2.0's (I will use dofferent web 2.0s)
3rd tier - 13 web 2.0's
4rd tier - 13 new set web 2.0's
Also what is the logic behind 12-12-13-13 combination? Can I just use 12-12-12-12 or 15-15-15-15?
Thx!
JohnnySalami
Registered Member
- Jan 4, 2012
- 82
- 9
MrBollywood,
Can you share what you do with your spun article content? What I mean is: do you maintain keyword density in the articles or don't mention the keywords at all except for the anchor links?
Can you share what you do with your spun article content? What I mean is: do you maintain keyword density in the articles or don't mention the keywords at all except for the anchor links?
- Status