Money site not receiving link juice from buffer sites?
- Thread starter lmaestro
- Start date
Anubis1980
Regular Member
- Mar 20, 2010
- 281
- 81
Your web2.0 and articles will be shown as backlinks for your Money site.
All other will not be shown..Keep going and create some link diversity.
lmaestro
Power Member
- Jan 28, 2011
- 667
- 230
so lets say my web 2.0 site is already index in yahoo site explorer for my money site,then i should not use the same web 2.0 site to blast my comments to?
Autumn
Elite Member
- Nov 18, 2010
- 2,197
- 3,073
It's just maths. You funnel the link juice from your shitty backlinks through your web 2.0s to your money site. You need a mix of a lot of different web 2.0s pointing to your money site, and a lot of shitty backlinks pointing to your web 2.0s.
Just getting web 2.0s indexed isn't enough - you want to build large numbers of backlinks to them to funnel PR through your web 2.0s to your money site. And you want lots and lots of web 2.0s spread over many different hosts, to get diverse backlinks to your money site plus as many good anchor text links pointing to your money site as you can.
Just getting web 2.0s indexed isn't enough - you want to build large numbers of backlinks to them to funnel PR through your web 2.0s to your money site. And you want lots and lots of web 2.0s spread over many different hosts, to get diverse backlinks to your money site plus as many good anchor text links pointing to your money site as you can.
dpatel1357
Registered Member
- Feb 21, 2010
- 82
- 20
Yeah, if your backlinks are already indexed, and they are good backlinks, then make some more
Autumn
Elite Member
- Nov 18, 2010
- 2,197
- 3,073
No they won't. They will appear as backlinks to your squidoo site, and your squidoo site will appear as a backlink to your money site. But your comment blast links are transferring PR through the squidoo lens to your money site - you just can't see it directly in Y! site explorer.
Kickflip
BANNED
- Jan 29, 2010
- 2,038
- 2,489
I will make it easy to understand:
Would you rather a link from Wikipedia or from Funny-Jokes-Lol-Online.info.
Funny-Jokes-Lol-Online.info is your web 2.0 without any backlinks to it.
Wikipedia is after you blast your web 2.0 with backlinks.
You want wikipedia. But just having a link from wikipedia wont display 10million links in your site explorer.
aarontorng
Registered Member
- Sep 11, 2010
- 97
- 19
When you say different hosts, you just mean different web 2.0 sites right? For example, spread it out between hubpages, squidoo, etc. Or do you mean something else?
Autumn
Elite Member
- Nov 18, 2010
- 2,197
- 3,073
Yep that's what I meant.
lmaestro
Power Member
- Jan 28, 2011
- 667
- 230
I see.So lets say my Squidoo page is already indexed,can i keep blasting that Squidoo page or is it advisable to create more web 2.0 properties as well?
SEORasta
Senior Member
- Sep 22, 2010
- 1,000
- 235
What I do is I have about 15-20 web 2.0 sites I do manually for 2 sites. Then I also do SEoLink Robot for 2 sites and will still pick up the web 2.0 link wheel from here and there AND do Link Push. Now with all those properties out there I SB Blast to those and the juice flows down. basically any link I create I will SB blast to it as each link already contains my money site link so were good there
Autumn
Elite Member
- Nov 18, 2010
- 2,197
- 3,073
Well it all depends on your web 2.0s - some sites you only get to make one link, some sites (eg. splogs on trusted blog hosts) you can make as many links as you want.
I would use "blue widget reviews" as my anchor on the web 2.0s about 50% (or a bit more) of the time and then various variations of "blue widget," "blue reviews," "widget reviews," "discount blue widget" etc the rest of the time. Some people might get good results using 100% "blue widget reviews" but I prefer to try to fly under the radar.
For your shitty links pointing to your web 2.0s you often have less of a choice in your anchor text eg. sometimes it will be http://web20domain.com/, sometimes it will be "Myfake Name", sometimes it will be an image link etc. But use variations of "blue widget reviews" wherever you can.
Fxbob
Junior Member
- Feb 21, 2011
- 154
- 343
Hey, just came across this, thought I would ask, do you have to put quality content in these web2.0s or simply a few words and a link to the main site?
Autumn
Elite Member
- Nov 18, 2010
- 2,197
- 3,073
Higher quality content definitely helps stop your web 2.0s getting deleted, ie it looks like a real page that has value and that a real person has put some time into. If your web 2.0s get deleted then obviously it's a big waste of time, not only the time spent making the web 2.0s but the time spent backlinking them as well.
Also, if you have a link to your money site with the anchor text "blue widgets" and it's in the middle of a paragraph of text talking about blue widgets, that will theoretically have more of a positive effect compared to the same link surrounded by unrelated text. Also contextual links (links that are embedded in the content rather than in isolated positions on the page) are generally considered to be of higher value. So yes, you will get more value out of your web 2.0s for a variety of reasons if you use semi decent content.