Mobile Antidetect Browser or Bluestacks/android emulator?

ReviewSoar

Failed to resolve a dispute resolution thread.
Joined
Mar 15, 2019
Messages
166
Reaction score
63
For creating google accounts and warming those accounts up, what should I choose between mobile antidetect browser (multilogin, gologin, identory etc.) and android emulators (bluestacks, Nox, LDPlayer, Memu)?

Does google know if I’m using an android emulator to register for gmail, adwords and such? And would this raise a red flag to google?
 
For creating google accounts and warming those accounts up, what should I choose between mobile antidetect browser (multilogin, gologin, identory etc.) and android emulators (bluestacks, Nox, LDPlayer, Memu)?

Does google know if I’m using an android emulator to register for gmail, adwords and such? And would this raise a red flag to google?
big no to emulator

use dolphin anty
 
I use an antidetect, it is much safer and calmer to work, I would not like to be banned at one point, switched to Gologin for more than a year, there are no problems with bans
Even with google services and products such as ads and merchant center?
 
Emulators are garbage for this application. Use a good antidetect browser and proxies.
 
For such tasks, it is better to use the antidetect browser, because. applications can easily calculate android emulators. Antidetect browsers were developed just for such purposes, and android emulators are designed for slightly different tasks.
 
For creating google accounts and warming those accounts up, what should I choose between mobile antidetect browser (multilogin, gologin, identory etc.) and android emulators (bluestacks, Nox, LDPlayer, Memu)?

Does google know if I’m using an android emulator to register for gmail, adwords and such? And would this raise a red flag to google?

An emulator might sound like a great idea but there are some caveats. I am assuming now that you're going to register on the web. If any of the websites that you intend to use do advanced fingerprinting then they'll be able to recognize that your device doesn't perform similarly to other devices of the same type and this might be enough to get your account in trouble.

If you're going to register through native apps then you might run into trouble even faster. A native application will have a much easier time telling whether it's running in an emulated environment or not.

Now, the important things to note here are "if" and "might". If you have time and capability you might as well try and find out what works best.
 
I use an antidetect, it is much safer and calmer to work, I would not like to be banned at one point, switched to Gologin for more than a year, there are no problems with bans
How many profiles did you manage?
 
For such tasks, it is better to use the antidetect browser, because. applications can easily calculate android emulators. Antidetect browsers were developed just for such purposes, and android emulators are designed for slightly different tasks.
I think apps have priority over browsers, why would a mobile user with a 4G IP, use a mobile browser instead of a mobile dedicated app?
 
asuming without testing will get you nowhere.

This is not logical problem with clear rules, but figuring out what some company did or didn't, you'll find many things works different that you would expect. Test
 
It's very easy for any app to know if you are on a emulator, in fact I use a function to know if a user is using an emulator on my app. Also in the moment you power on an emulator, this send a lot of info to Google, so if you then use any browser, they already know about the emulator.
 
lol can't use an emulator without spoofing the SoC. Create emulator, install Device Info HW in. you will see, the emulator is using your computer CPU (eg Core I7). lol, a Samsung phone with a Core i7 CPU
 
Back
Top