[METHOD] How To Write Human Like SEO Blog Post That Ranks – chatGPT PROMPT!

Guys!

I wanted to share something super cool with you all. I’ve been using this awesome chatGPT prompt to write tons of blog posts, and it’s been a game-changer! ?

Why do you need this prompt?

• Human-Like Writing: The posts come out sounding like a real person wrote them, not a robot! This makes your content more engaging and relatable.
• SEO-Friendly: It helps you create blog posts that are optimized for search engines, so you can rank higher and get more traffic to your site.
• Perfect Length: It guides you to write between 1500-2000 words, which is the sweet spot for detailed, informative posts that readers (and Google) love.
• Super Easy to Use: Just follow the prompt, and you’ll have a high-quality post in no time. No need to stress about what to write next.
• Totally Free! Yep, I’m sharing it for free because I’ve seen how useful it is and I want to help others out.

Trust me, if you’re looking to improve your blog or website, this prompt is a must-try. I’ve written tons of articles with it, and it’s made a huge difference for me. Give it a shot and let me know what you think!

Get The Prompt Here!

Happy writing!

You need multiple prompts to retry things. On zero shot it's all pointless.
You can do mini-training within a chat session. Nothing to do with fine-tuning, but it improves things progressively.

I wouldn't recommend to write more than 200 - 300 words long posts due to decreasing UX after a certain number of words.
Instead of posting a large body of text, think about visual content like images and video.

It works like a human with attention (transformers have a mechanism built into it called that way).
It pays attention to the whole prompt and context window, but also previous message is considered.

So if you put 100 words long prompt, it's going to get confused about what's more important and what's not.
So it's gonna do only a part of a request.

The same as human. Tell a human to do 50 things at once. They will only do the most general thing + get stressed.
Then if you work with people in this fashion, you're not gonna have a good relationship with them.

Instead, a prompt can be 3 - 5 words and each prompt can be a new correction.

You're not paying for number of inputs (messages), but input and output tokens (chars).

https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/the-longwriter-ai-breaks-10-000-word-barrier-challenging-human-authors.1628441/#post-18062755

With regards to cost, AI chat can be free, but that's only possible if you manage to quit a typical SEO-caveman mindset and join AWS -> go to Amazon Bedrock -> Playground / API connection.

OccultKingdoms said:

You need multiple prompts to retry things. On zero shot it's all pointless.
You can do mini-training within a chat session. Nothing to do with fine-tuning, but it improves things progressively.

I wouldn't recommend to write more than 200 - 300 words long posts due to decreasing UX after a certain number of words.
Instead of posting a large body of text, think about visual content like images and video.

It works like a human with attention (transformers have a mechanism built into it called that way).
It pays attention to the whole prompt and context window, but also previous message is considered.

So if you put 100 words long prompt, it's going to get confused about what's more important and what's not.
So it's gonna do only a part of a request.

The same as human. Tell a human to do 50 things at once. They will only do the most general thing + get stressed.
Then if you work with people in this fashion, you're not gonna have a good relationship with them.

Instead, a prompt can be 3 - 5 words and each prompt can be a new correction.

You're not paying for number of inputs (messages), but input and output tokens (chars).

https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/t...llenging-human-authors.1628441/#post-18062755

With regards to cost, AI chat can be free, but that's only possible if you manage to quit a typical SEO-caveman mindset and join AWS -> go to Amazon Bedrock -> Playground / API connection.

View attachment 371240
View attachment 371241View attachment 371243

Click to expand...

Hey OccultKingdoms,

Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

You’ve got some great points about using multiple prompts and guiding the process step by step. That’s exactly why I’ve shared a set of prompts—not just one. These help refine the content bit by bit, so you’re not stuck trying to get everything perfect in one go.

I totally get what you’re saying about keeping posts shorter for better user experience and the power of visual content. But for those who want to dive deep into a topic, especially for SEO, longer articles can really pay off. My prompts are designed to help you break down the writing into easy, manageable pieces, making sure the content stays clear and engaging, even if it’s longer.

As for cost, I agree there are ways to get more out of these tools without spending a lot. But for anyone looking for a simple, effective way to improve their writing without extra hassle, my prompts offer a straightforward solution.

Thanks again for your input! It’s great to see different perspectives, and I hope this helps explain how my prompts can make writing easier and more effective.

Happy writing!

JamesLovell said:

I totally get what you’re saying about keeping posts shorter for better user experience and the power of visual content. But for those who want to dive deep into a topic, especially for SEO, longer articles can really pay off. My prompts are designed to help you break down the writing into easy, manageable pieces, making sure the content stays clear and engaging, even if it’s longer.

Click to expand...

No. It doesn't work like that.

If you write a lot of content, it will kill UX.

Think of YouTube as an example of one of the best experiences of all time.

You can't beat that.

Google has been obliterated by SEOs who fell into their own trap, but so you can outrank all of them with proper UX.
Look how much SEOs complain about Google which they have created with their own deeds and greed.

UX is not what people will tell you. It's not about providing a lot of information. It's about providing as much value in as little time as possible + decreasing unnecessary emotions and helping people become more calm instead of nervous.

It's about decreasing friction on all levels. Only then you'll get satisfied, happy people who'll be glad to cooperate with you and partake in doing business with you.

Some interesting UX is on AWS, Adobe, YouTube, Instagram and some other large companies.

Those tricks provided by SEOs aren't working on many ends and all they're doing is buying links to make it seem that it works.
It's only a self-fulfilling prophecy and any student of psychology will tell you that.

Text + backlinks work because it fakes reputation, but you can get reputation by providing killer UX and giving to your users what they'd like to be given.

It only serves as a money printer, but they themselves later have to use those bloated sites with 1000s of words of text. So want to read that... good luck. I can see on blackhatworld how people take that stuff too seriously and write lengthy arguments in 500 words that easily can be put in 1 - 2 sentences.



This is a statistic from YouTube. What is that blue stuff? 80.4% is "spam" which means? Putting too many keywords and writing lengthy descriptions. YouTube is about video and if you put content into description, you're immediately seen as an SEO (spammer).

YouTube is fighting with descriptions and text as much as possible and they still rank the highest in Google on tutorial, how-to related, questions keywords.

There are accusations that Google's search algorithm updates have made it increasingly difficult for non-Google properties to rank well.
But here's how it can be seen.

Since Google is aware of the issue with text and poor UX, they may prioritize their own properties cause they know they're made in a UX way. Hence they have a very strong reason to rank their own properties higher.

But the truth is, a YouTube clone with HQ video, has very high chances of ranking and being spoken of on the internet. One would basically clone UX and that's the gem of such platforms. The UX. Nothing more. Driving people to create HQ stuff is their secret.

Still this prompt Working well? Or do you update it? If updated then share with us

Create humanistic, E-E-A-T friendly, free AI Content detector articles in seconds using custom trained and fine-tuned Gemini AI
https://dunia.it.com/article-generator/

I think it is programmed with a few types of articles to be a little different. But if each request is written by one person, I think there is no free.