manual linkwheels vs automated linkwheels

milooot

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2012
Messages
164
Reaction score
34
i was thinking to create a manual linkwheel made of 6 high PR web 2.0 do-follow .

3 web 2.0 to point to another 3 web 2.0 which then point to my money site , and then on all web 2.0 to blast 1k high PR backlinks to each web 2.0.

im planing to do this manually except of the scrapebox comments.

or do you prefer to use any tool to do it faster.
what are the pro and cons of doint it manually also i would love to know if i can use public proxies to create accounts on web 2.0 and which web 2.0 would you suggest me.

thank you :)
 
after making a diagram of this idea it looks more like a link pyramid lol
 
Hi,

I would always go with manual Web 2.0 sites. They will be better-lasting and have more impact.

Just to make clear, a linkwheel will connect these Web 2.0's together (they will link to each other as well as to your money sites). If they don't link to each other, then you're right it's a pyramid.

You should be fine with public proxies. If you're only creating one Web 2.0 on each platform though you shouldn't even need them. Different 2.0 sites don't compare notes about what IP addresses create accounts.
 
i was planing to play safe, so thought to use public proxies but thought if google blocks those proxies and later finds out that the sites were made from ips that they banned are they going to ban my web 2.0 too. just a though.
 
Link wheel is a set of web 2.0 properties interlinked with each other in a "wheel" structure. All pointing to your main site and also to each other in a wheel. That's why this method is called "link wheel"
 
the web 2.0s i prefer to do manually, the next tiers i like comments/profiles/wikis/socials.. i do automated
 
the web 2.0s i prefer to do manually, the next tiers i like comments/profiles/wikis/socials.. i do automated

what tools do you suggest for the automation tool , im using scrapebox for the ******** blog comments , thought to use wiki;s too but i see mixed opinions about wikis some say they are very good for rankings other say they are useless :S
 
what tools do you suggest for the automation tool , im using scrapebox for the ******** blog comments , thought to use wiki;s too but i see mixed opinions about wikis some say they are very good for rankings other say they are useless :S

wikis/blog comments/profiles for me are from same low quality, but still contribute to the final picture..

for comments i use scrapebox, for wikis my own wiki submitter that i developed with the purpose of selling, but i decided not to sell.. for profiles i buy some xrumer blasts here and there..
 
Personally, I like to see something like this:

LINK-PUSH Large.jpg

I have no affiliation...
We
 
They are mostly useless (IMHO). Spend that time/money/energy for finding quality content.
 
Cant go wrong treating Tier 1's like money sites. I would use more diversity in my link building.
 
pyramid is the best and also use private IP. I recommend for manually work. There is a strategy I want to suggest here. you can create an account on 1 web 2.0. post 2 articles without link in firstly with image and videos related to your niche. This aims to index web 2.0 site. After 2 no_backlink articles, continue with 2 other artciles with backlink in that point to your money site. It means that on 1 web 2.0, will post 4 articles: 2 of them have non backlinks and others have backlink. Certainly, high quality content and diversity anchor text.
Hope that this strategy will help your site safe and promote ranking soon.
 
I always prefer automation above manual for obvious reasons. You should simply put a lot of effort into it. Several unique articles for web 2.0s, spin them manually add images videos etc all spun ;)
 
Back
Top